So do the Chinese people not fucking care about the environment at all?There's no internal discussion over there about decimating the global fishery population and driving so many species to extinction?Seriously, not even joking what the fuck is wrong with those guys
They don't have any actual allies so they have no incentive to play nice. Sound familiar?
>>220708548this has nothing to do with allies or geopolitics if you destroy this planet it's over, you don't get another one
>>220708520It's hilarious how transparently biased Amerigoyim are against China because they got psyoped by glowies and jewish media. China is the single biggest investor and innovator in renewable energy on the planet, period, and you're still bashing them because of muh fisheries. They're the least malevolent superpower and yet get the most criticism because your CIA can't stop running psyops for 1 second
>>220708686>because of muh fisheriesuh yes retard they are literally driving global oceanic fisheries to extinction and you are pretending like this doesnt matter because they invest in solar? who gives a fuck
>>220708520I'm pretty sure they do to an extent. I see a lot of Chinese animal breeders.
>>220708686Now show what % of global carbon emission they're responsible for.
>>220708706You don't actually care about global fisheries unless you're a marine researcher, and when they fix that you'll still go after them for some other problem it's fucking nonstop with you golems. Not a day goes by without you painting China as demons while they're just minding their own business and (You)r Jewish puppet state rapes the world for Israel to make a few more shekels.
>>220708804I care about fishes in south american coasts, did chinkas deplete all surrounding waters already they had to go that far and steal into other's eez
>>220708804>You don't actually care about global fisheries unless you're a marine researcheruh no actually I'm a normal person and I care that china is trying to kill every single fish in the oceanwhat the fuck is wrong with you lmao?
>>220708925>Oh no!*bombs girls school with a tomahawk missile*>The fishies!*Crashes the global economy*>How could they do this?!*Sponsors Israel's expansionism and genocides*>The humanity!!!!*Coups 4 Latin American countries, bombs the Middle East, and starts 5 civil wars*All in a day's work for the US of A, world's most moral arm- superpower. GAWD BLESS
>there's a fucking genocide happening in giza,palpatine https://x.com/i/status/1930960992470442409
>>220709123None of that shit matters more than the fish
>>220708520I hate shortsighted empires as much as everyone else but the Chinese are doing it for their own people, you angloids burnt the world so you could stay as pets to blacks, jeets and it's really's
>>220708520>So do the Chinese people not fucking care about the environment at all?They are shifting to cleaner energy, and younger city dwellers do care to an extent.Older people don't care, and small town dwellers don't give a shit. >There's no internal discussion over there about decimating the global fishery population and driving so many species to extinction?Full of plastic anyway so who cares? Either they eat them and get cancer in a few decades, or the fish die from fish cancer
>>220709123>Destroying nature vs. the fictional economyAlso no one likes Muslims or south American dictators running off Marxist policies from the 80s because they never got the memo that the USSR collapsed.
>>220712734The plastic thing is a total non issue btw. Recent research reveals that:1) microplastics in remote, non-human locations have FAR less microplastics than previously measured due to measurement error 2) microplastics don’t actually cause that much damage to the human body, like we already knew to some extent
>>220709123You aren’t going to find a single American here defending our shit tier corrupt governments sponsorship of Israel’s war. That changes NOTHING. The environment and the protection of global fisheries is maybe 10000x more important than anything happening in Gaza today. I say this as someone that hates what Israel is doing there.
Bump
The factory of the world creates more pollution? No way
>>220716902They shouldn't be the factory of the world but evil won.
>>220708520the chinese do more for the environment than you americans
>>220708686>>220708804>>220709123Trvkes not seen since hiroshima
>>220708766everyone produces in china. blame the companies and hold them accountable if you don't like it.
>>220719308>>220719282>>220719268Top Polluters by Total Emissions (CO2) China: Produces approximately 30% of global emissions, driven by heavy coal reliance.United States: Responsible for roughly 15% of emissions, with high per capita consumption.India: Third-largest emitter, heavily impacted by industrial and agricultural pollution.Russia: Major contributor due to energy production and industrial activity.Japan: Significant emitter due to high industrial energy usage. Selectra Climate ConsultingSelectra Climate Consulting +4I'm excited to see the cope
>>220719564world factory. if they don't produce it someone else will.
>>220719603Yep that's what I expected. Most other countries have laws regulating environment and don't mass burn coal
>>220719646it's a free market. if you don't like it buy from someone else and produce somewhere else.
>china does so much for the environment it loves the environment >It produces the most pollution on earth>WELL THATS BECAUSE "excuse"I want to get paid to shill like this too
>>220719668Notice how the Chinese shill changes his entire argument and stance once proven wrong. The communist shill will deflect to capitalism to defend china's complete lack of environmental regulation
>>220719740environmental regulation is communism
>>220719765Notice how the world and ideology wraps around any direction to defend china.First it was china is the best for the environment unlike evil America and now it's capitalism fault.
>>220719564So the US produces more than twice as much per capita, after offshoring it's manufacturing? Taiwan also produces more per capita.
>>220719805america isn't the world factory and they don't do as much as china does for renewable energy
>>220719818By that logic India is the best because it does less than china. Making a cope why china is the number 1 polluter doesn't change pretending it was great for the environment now changing the argument to defend the country paying you to make these posts
>>220719855if they stop producing and polluting the environment it is just going to shift to another country with a lot of people and cheap energy. how do you think china got into this position in the first place?
>>220719823Yep the cope posts after getting disproven
>>220719855Tick tock agent Smith
No. There is no moral obligation to steward nature in Chinese religion or culture and there never has been. It’s simply a source of resources to be raped and tolerated.
>>220719905>reddit>after epstein and everything that happenedlmao
>>220719896Not true. China gets most of its energy from coal which is worse than the chell energy America uses. But even if it wasn't that's besides the point. It's hilarious watching the shill tactics change in real time
>>220719940coal is cheap. it makes products cheaper.
>>220719964Now the argument changes yet again Yes things bad for the environment are cheap. That's why china has very few environmental regulations
>>220720030if you don't like it sanction them or smth. don't buy from them etc. if they don't sell they will stop producing and polluting. cry to the un or smth.
>>220720030also don't buy our cars or cars from anyone else who makes their parts in china. don't buy anything with made in china on it.
Here is of countries by how much pollution by unit of energy generated China ~500 g/kWh (falling)India ~700–900 g/kWhPoland ~700+ g/kWhUSA ~400 g/kWh Taiwan ~500–600 g/kWhJapan ~400–500 g/kWhFrance ~50–100 g/kWh (nuclear-heavy)Sweden ~20–50 g/kWhNorway ~10–30 g/kWh (hydro)UK ~120 g/kWhCountries that rely on coal are generally more than oil/gas which are more than nuclear. China is actually more than America per unit of energy created. Taiwan is pretty high too.
>>220720070>>220720133You are literally changing your ideology and argument in order to find any way to defend your pay pig china. I hope the 50 cents is worth it.
>>220720147>>220720183i am just being realistic instead of a propagandized subhuman like you
>>220720183You started the argument with a strawman and statistics that disprove your own position
>>220720030>>220720147>>220720183and what are you going to do about it? cry on 4chan about it?
>>220720215You started your shill posts by saying china does more to help the environment Once that was disproven you are now coping and saying it's ok that china doesn't do more to help the environment because.....This is why arguing with shills is pointless. There are no morals or actual consistent ideology.
>>220720301>he expects morals and actual consistency when it comes to economics, policy and politicskekw
>>220720234I started the argument by posting facts. I did so because I was curious to see what strategy shills would use in response.That's what I find more interesting than which country actually produces the most pollution even though it does happen to be china
>>220720348Well of course shills have no morals. I hope this was worth the 50 cents you earned
>>220720357imagine how much they would polute if they don't use any green energy. imagine how much everyone else would polute if they couldn't buy solar panels from china.
hope china invades taiwan and builds consternation camps there
>>220720401Nuclear is far less CO2 producing than even most "green" energy. Solar barely changed the calculus. France is the best way forward. Sorry shill about the smog
>>220720215>erm so what if china is raping the entire world and creating an uninhabitable wasteland for future generations? they have more shekels per goyim!
>>220720453Chinese will all die of smog poisoning before that happens
Your ass should be teared again kesaar
Countries CO2 produced by unit of energy United States: ~360–370 gCO2/kWh (gas-heavy but shifting with renewables).China: ~530–580 gCO2/kWh (coal dominant, despite massive renewable additions).India: ~630+ gCO2/kWh (coal-heavy).EU overall: ~270–280 gCO2/kWh (improving rapidly with renewables and coal phase-outs).Germany: Higher than EU average (~300–400 in transition years due to coal/gas).France: Very low (~50–80, nuclear-led).UK: ~200–300 (improving with offshore wind).What's funny is Germany which spends the most on green energy actually uses more CO2 per unit of energy because they use so much inefficient shit for looks (solar in a country that has no light) that all their effort is offset by having to burn coal to make up for it.France which uses nuclear (which Germany seethes at them for) produces some of the least.If every country used the France method we could reduce emissions by 75%
The evil western first world countries that the media hates and criticizes is actually the best at managing safe and environmentally friendly energy. If china and India could produce energy as Europe that alone would reduce co2 levels by 30%.
>>220720811Forgot my image
>>220720183I think he's doing it for free
>>220719925while this is a viable theory, the west never had a "moral obligation" to care for the environment either. environmental stewardship is almost entirely a recent development.
>>220712825Cope and cope, enjoy your cancer lil bro
>>220708520The environment stuff is just colonial propaganda to make sure thrid worls dont develop and compete fair with then
>>220708520Asians in general (including the Indian subcontinent) don't really care about anything except providing for their families and saving face. Everything else is a minor inconvenience at best.
>>220722642this
>>220722642If anything environmentalists want the first world to reduce its exploitative reliance on the third world to curb consumption and waste.
>>220722729They were shocked into modernity and skipped almost every phase of development leading up to division of labor. It's hard to go from village/tribal structures straight into supply chains and specialized labor. When you think about it the average person has very little control over the things they use daily, the parts in your fridge come from resources all over the world and are manufactured separately before assembly. The amount of effort it takes to make a car from scratch is literally impossible even if you had a whole village dedicate themselves to it, you need to mine the iron, find a source of petroleum, then there's copper, lead, rubber, etc. then after all of that then you need to create the tools needed for assembly. Most of these people were completely sedentary for who knows how long and barely interacted outside of their village because they were stuck doing agriculture or foraging because they live in tropical environments where food is endless.
So the Taiwanese propagandist is done for the day? Got his paycheck?
>>220719915kek bodied that vpn freak
this german poster has to be joking there's no way he actually believes this
>>220708706something else worth mentioning is that wind and solar became economically competitive years ago i.e. of course they would build it
>So do the Chinese people not fucking care about the environment at all?China has installed more solar power this year alone than the entire American energy productions. Gringoys are so pozzed by propaganda, it's incredible.
>>220727365Something worth mentioning is that it's them that made it that way, dumbass. Didn't see any American companies heavily investing in solar power scale-up in the last 20 years.
>>220708565Sound familiar?
>>220727430and...?
>>220709239it gets to a point yknow? this is just stupid and childish of you
