>Latino has become synonymous with South American IndiosRoman Bros... we've had our day
>>220841552Never understood why they were called latinos? Because they're catholic and speak a romance language? So do brazilians yet they're not called latinx.
>>220841593Latin America is supposed to be just that, the part of america that speaks latin languages, including Brazil. Imagine fighting over a name chosen for you by colonizers kek.
>>220841552You know that in Latinx prisons inmates fight and kill each other daily like roman gladiators
Latin = ancient RomeLatino = Spanish ex-coloniesOnly idiots would confuse the two.
>>220841552quien no quiere ser cristiano deberia almenos renunciar a enriquecer el lexico de su incredulidad con patrimonio linguistico cristiano
>>220841741keeping the traditions alive
>>220841662The use of the latino label is an American thing entirely.We do not call ourselves that in our own countries.
Bloodthirsty Latinx cartels are closer in spirit to true Romans than cat munching shitalians.
>>220842641maybe on planet retard, the Romans were the cradle of civilization
>>220843031No they weren't, the Romans mostly copied the Greeks and Etruscans, and the Greeks didn't come up with their civilization in a vacuum either, it was influenced by near-est civilizations too
>>220841552>we
"Latin America" is a french invention from a time they still saw themslves as the leaders of the romance speaking world"Latino" is a amerilard racial term for mexicansWe don't give a crap about any of that shit
>>220841593my understanding is that france began using the term latinx maerican after losing their american territories, as a way to claim some influence in the continentunder that definition brazil and haiti are also latinxs
