[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: women and money.jpg (407 KB, 1080x1070)
407 KB JPG
>>
>>220853945
Sort of me. But that’s probably because she was still in school during our early relationship. She income mogs me today
>>
>>220853945
Yeah because money is a non factor in female hypergamy unless you use it to fix your face, hair and height. Everyone with half a brain knows this already.
>>
>>220853945
Wow fucking newsflash.
People don't seek things they already have.
>>
>>220853945
No, they usually start to demand men that earn/have much more than them.
>>
>>220853945
Well yeah. Have you ever watched the Titanic? Rose is rich and she doesn't want Cal who's grumpy and boring and hostile she wants to jump on Jack's dick despite him being poor because he's fun and friendly
>>
I have never seen a wealthy woman date a non wealthy man
>>
>>220853945
Where's my sugar mommy then?
>>
Utter bullshit.

Maybe they say that but they certainly don't act like that.
>>
>>220854688
I date an uber wealthy woman as an entry level wealthy man.

One of the UK prime ministers (Rishi Sunak who was already posh as fuck, but ultra rich) married an uber wealthy woman too.
>>
>>220854688
I've seen that happenb in terms of """perceived""" status. my biology teacher with a mechanic. well now that I said it like that the mechanic probably makes way more.
>>
>>220853945
No I believe they still want someone who earns more than them which narrows options down even more
>>
>>220853945
no
>>
>>220853945
Yeah, I know a plenty of couples where the woman earns more.
>>
File: looks.png (1.39 MB, 1636x1188)
1.39 MB PNG
>>220853945
Jeremy Meeks was a good-for-nothing scumbag Crips murderer (teardrop tattoo) and yet a billionaire's heiress married him after he got out of jail just because he's hot. Money is for betabuxx deluxe, not true attraction.
>>
File: IMG_6402.png (1.13 MB, 594x1309)
1.13 MB PNG
>>220853945
>women desire for dorky betabuxx
They never desired them desu
>>
>>220858197
>hot people have an easier time finding a mate
more at 11
>>
>>220854688
I went to a private school
Lot's of girls had flings with public school thugs
>>
>>220858291
Van de Velde fucked a child. Meeks killed a child. Both have infinitely more success and will ALWAYS be worth far more than any 5'2 bald Pajeet deathnic who makes $600K a year working as a nuclear scientist.
>>
>>220854453
This seems to be what I see a lot of, too. Granted it's social media that keeps pushing it, and they have a vested interest in keeping you angry and demoralized. But it's definitely a thing.
>>
there's two instincts
>promiscuous/lust-based instinct
>romantic/monagamous-drive

both are appearance based in different ways
>promiscuous drive = interpret someone as attractive because they look attractive - personality is a minor factor
>romantic drive = slowly gradually develop feelings for them and thus find them physically attractive

most posters here haven't been in a loving relationship so they don't understand but
my first girlfriend I was intensely in love with and thought she was 10/10 most beautiful girl on the planet. Recently I saw a picture of her. She looked fine but was quite normal looking, maybe 6.5/10. not ugly but definitely not a model. I was genuinely driven by her personality (very creative, low ego, sang like an angel, high iq) and the looks attraction came as a result. However, there was still a 1:1 association between facial attractiveness and personality attractiveness - its just that the causation was the other way around - I found her good looking because I had feelings for her.

Moral of the story is that if you're not in the top 10-15% attractive men, but you want a woman who loves you and is attracted to you, the ONLY way to get that is a slow-burn relationship where you meet her in a non-flirtatious context (not on tinder, not at a bar, just via some community/activity/friend-circle/whatever) and she just grows to like you over time. She will become physically attracted to you over time, not at first glance. Trying to flirt with women you just met or meet women on an app will always fail, unless youre in the top tier it doesnt work like that for anyone. it doesn't even work like that for a large portion of women
>>
>>220858384
>no, you don't understand, HOT PEOPLE FIND IT EASIER TO GET A MATE
bro the same shit is true in reverse you don't think some of the most evil bitches can find a guy who will simp for them? what point are you even trying to make?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.