Why was Australia, a relatively unknown continent that was barren, colonized exclusively only by the British?
They had to dump the scum off somewhere. Why not some barren cunt of a place at the arse end of the world? It sorted itself out.
Why not?
the French were sniffing around too but the Brits made the effort to claim things first
>>220887804The French were scared of us
because Poortuguese were lazy they were in Timor even as far back as the 1500s but didn't bother looking aroundAustralia could have been Brazil 2.0
>>220887804The job required Nightriders, rockers, rollers, outtacontrollers
>>220889946kek
>>220887804it was impossible to navigate for outsiders for the most partthe british pretended to control it till they figured out how to actually control it
>>220887804wasn't it just a dumping ground for their malcontents like >>220887815 said?
>>220889925>Australia could have been Brazil 2.0
>>220890694Portuguese/Aboriginal mongrels eating kangaroo head soup would be peak sovl
>>220890717You are insane
We discoevered Australia before cook.
>>220889925https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_the_Portuguese_discovery_of_Australiahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahogany_Ship
>>220887804Because Anglos are the only people who could see such a desolate place and turn it into a paradise. The Spanish weren't interested because there was no one to pillage, and the French didn't bother because they were too scared to fight the English for it, and even if they did get it they would have filled it with niggers
