Would you pass?
human rights didn't exist yet
>>220962248Only for white Americans
>>220962248Objectively correct, shows how dumb pseuds are
>>220962248Correct.
what's so civil about war anyway
>>220962216Meanwhile in Europe
>>220962216>I want to become American and get full voting rights>also I think half its working class are subhumans who deserve torture because of their wealthy ancestral overlords
>>220962248And they still don’t. Kill or be killed. And I don’t mean that in an edgelord way. I would never want to be put in a situation where I’d have to kill. But that’s the way it is.
>>220962216it's the correct answer though, and triggered the war of northern aggression when the south stood up for their rights
>>220962216>Implying states' rights aren't human rights
>>220962402Fact
>>220962402>and triggered the war of northern aggression when the south stood up for their rightsCorrect
>>220962216>and, well, fucking yikes
>>220962500>>220962496>>220962402You lost
>>220962216>NOOOOOOO THE CIVIL WAR WASN'T ABOUT SLAVERY!! STOP BELIEVING THE MAINSTREAM NARRATIVE!!! IT WAS ABOUT STATES' RIGHTS TO... TO OWN... FUCK YOU, YOU FUCKING JEW!!!
>>220962337>mir newshe fell for it lmao
>>220962924It's part of the official study guide for the UK citizenship test.
Taking history tests as a requisite for citizenship is so reddit coded bro. What difference does it even make if they know the answer or not
show me a human right
>>220962402TRVKE
>>220962337>Hanukkahthat might become true someday if greatest ally gets even more uppity than they already are
is there anyone who actually fails this? seems like a meme https://americanhistory.si.edu/citizenship/test
>>220963454having dumb questions on that test is kind of based if everyone is required to take it in English
>>220963486I failed a question about the number of congressmen in the house of representatives immediately after posting that. the difficulty is that IRL it's not multiple-choice so you must know the exact answer.still, there are some very easy questions like "what city is the capital of the U.S.", "what does the constitution do", "what was the cold war about"
>>220962248desu. human rights still don't exist outside of westeros.
>>220962216>>220962248>>220962402Trvke. Reminder that Lincoln never freed a single slave
>>220962248They still don't. Well they do, in the sense of natural rights, but not the globalist UN style "human rights" bullshit.
>>220962402The south shouldn't have shot up a Union fort if they didn't want to lose the war
>>220962248but from the mdern standpoint human rights issues led to the war
>>220962216states rights to what
>>220962216I don't get it, D was the reason, what's wrong there
>>220964055Secession
>>220962216Mutts arent humans
>>220962248human rights began on july 4 1776
>>220964128Point me to the phrase “human rights” in the US constitution.
>>220964055>>220964066>>220964078Before the civil war>States could do almost whatever the fuck they wantedAfter the civil war>States can only do what the federal government allows them toErgo, in pratice, it was a power grab by the federal government, from a purely power relations/realpolitik point of view. If you dispute this you have no sense of politiccing, i.e., you are a pure idealist.
>>220962402Absolutely based
>it's a crime against humanity that the heckin black people had to work in the fields!>but it's totally okay that a little chinese boy is working 6 12 hour days per week to make everything you consume and not only is he a slave but it's also bringing down the quality of life for regular people in your country and making the rich mega rich like human gods>that's le totally fine and capitalism at its best!
>>220964412was there a vote held where people chose to outsource to china?
>>220964429in a private boardroom, yesdemocratic votes don't happen anymore
>>220964412>little chinese boy is working 6 12 hour days per weekChinks have already been outsourcing their low-paid factory work for the past fifteen years you fucking boomer.
>>220964476alright my point is - it doesn't change that somebody is always the slave, explicitly or implicitly
>>220962610Not southern but I find it funny how people try to flex northern military prowess during the Civil War, when the north only began to win battles once they realized they just had to disregard casualties and use all the new Irish as cannon fodder. I believe Lincoln said that they will only win once he gets a general "who understands the arithmetic."
>>220962248https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_the_Rights_of_Man_and_of_the_Citizen
>>220964491>implicitlyComparing chattle slavery to being a free citizen working a minimum wage job is very American.
>>220964953he's not wrong in that it's modern day version of slaveryit's just not the same as chattle slavery yeah
>>220964953wage slavery is actually worse because there is no guarantee that you will make enough money for basic food and shelter
>>220964978are you retarded? i'd rather be homeless than live in the barns as a slave
>>220965012being homeless in america isn't easy like it is in europethey burn plastic trash to stay alive
>>220964978>
>>220962402Lol
>>220962216The soul of the USA died with the Confederacy, it's all been downhill every since
if it was about states rights then why didn't the southern states vote for the constitutional amendment that would make it illegal for the federal government to ban slavery? more of the north supported it than the south even!
>>220963800Yep. Should have fought a purely defensive war. The North was more prone to war weariness, despite its industrial superiority. The South should have dug trenches and let the North run the gauntlet. Instead, the South was afflicted with a Napoleonic general born in the wrong era.
>>220962337as opposed to the bastion of freedom the US is?
>>2209641281789, little bro
>>220962402>Eurocuck Dixieboolmao
>>220965511
