[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_9172.jpg (116 KB, 795x1200)
116 KB JPG
Is this fake news? I can’t tell anymore with X
>>
>>221255896
No, it's to protect the owner restaurants from fake reviews
>>
>>221255923
this, and banning paternity tests protects children
>>
>>221255896
that's so Japanese of them
>>
So you're forced to giving 4-5 star reviews? sounds bullshit
>>
File: IMG_9173.jpg (59 KB, 1206x701)
59 KB JPG
>>221256133
Well i read the comments a bit and im still confused if its EU or Germany only but its true. The owners have a legal right to claim a review is defamatory and Google or other review sites doesnt wanna bother with it so they just take them down at the request of the owner. However Google displays how many reviews have been hidden this way so you can tell that the overall review is bullshit
>>
>>221256243
>>221255896
Defamation and libel are a thing.
>>
>>221256243
Reminds me of chuds spamming 1 star reviews on non-muslim businesses on Gmaps except in reverse. Not based



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.