Was Rhodesia really that glorious?
>>221293715Why did economic growth collapse when Rhodesia became Zimbabwe?
>>221293750No particular reason
i only recently heard of rhodesia. was it like south africa before apartheid ended?
>>221293876Yes. There was a referendum to integrate it into South Africa but the Rhodesians voted against it
>>221293876kind of but slightly less restrictive
>>221293715She stayed for BBC
>>221293934VPN off John Smith
>>221294147She stayed for BBC
>>221294147>John Don't you mean Ian Smith, BBC connoisseur general and the Prime Minister of our glorious BBC Breeding Grounds Republic of Rhodesia?
>>221293934>>221294173big bankrupted currency
>>221294371
>>221294371Lol
>>221293715Africa is the most beautiful continent on the planet. Too bad it's infested
>>221293715It was pretty retarded, whipepo denied 95% of the population their rights.FAFO.
>>221293750because race natutonalists are retarded and expelling your educated workforce instead of coexisting is economically retarded
>>221295400>race nationalists are retardedDo you actually believe this anon? Is it racial nationalism that's the problem or something else?
>>221295400>>221295473Imagine if Africa wasn't full of race nationalists!! Africa would be as advanced as Europe, America, and Asia if that was the case...
>>221293876>Be Rhodesia>British colonialists found the the most successful African country in history >No slavery, but fairly ancap. They paid blacks a really low amount and ruling class was exclusively white >One day for no reason at all that becomes not okay anymore and the entire world abandons them and supports various rebels groups>Rhodesians fight tooth and nail but eventually Globohomo and the blacks that outnumber them 10:1 win the war>Immediately falls into hyper inflation, poverty, corruption, and other African normsIt was a sad state of affairs. Now anybody that knows anything about Africa knows Rhodesia was the better option. But back then it couldn't be allowed to exist because of racism or something
>>221293715if it was why would they change the name
>>221295473yeah i believe itlike the race nationalists that decided to oppress 90% of the population and thought thered be no consequences>>221295567dishonest argument and strawman
>>221296320>like the race nationalists that decided to oppress 90% of the population and thought thered be no consequencesI mean it worked for a century. And the race nationalism here worked for two centuries.
>>221296506but it didnt in the end as your slave population eventually rose up
>>221296535No they didn't. We just gave up.
>>221295683bros.............
