>100 years ago England alone had a larger population than all of Africa >Today Nigeria alone has more births than all of Europe and Russia combined How are you not black pulled iyc?
I'm sure they'll enjoy their lives and won't feel the need to illegally immigrate to Europe
>>221373704Subsaharans are unironically a way smaller problem than nafris or jeets. But generally I'm not blackpilled because I know climate change will make the tropics almost uninhabitable soon. MENA, India, Porkistan, SEA all gone. We just need to close our borders once shit starts going down.
>>221373753>I know climate change will make the tropics almost uninhabitable soonThat is why they all need to travel to Europe as climate refugees because you western nations caused global warming
>>221373740Nigerians almost exclusively go to the US and the UK.
>>221373777>you western nationsI'm sure taiwan runs on solar and is totally co2 neutral
>>221373704i doubt england ever had more people than africa at one point
>>221374261All you racis white people be colonizing our air.
>>221374261his logic is probably that most damage was done in the victorisn era eg all western
>>221374340Except it wasn't. Most of it was done since the 1970s because most CO2 was released by making plastic toys for boomers unironically. Check the charts, I'm not making this up. Thing is though climate change is not about co2 or cow farts but mainly water (over)use and soil depletion, which has to do with overpopulation. By that logic also most of the damage was done by turd worlders breeding like mad in the last 100 years.Reminder that the Epstein files talked about the urgent need to denuclearise Pakistan because their glaciers will melt and not come back one year, the Indus river will begin to dry out and the muzzies will chimp out and use their nukes as blackmail for water. The elite Yids plan to let India run over Pakistan and Iran LMAO.
>>221373753>We just need to close our borders once shit starts going down>WeWho is "we" and why do you speak on behalf of Europeans? They may well need to, however we got to close down bugger all, because these people of various brown shades are just going to replace our already existing lower classes, which are arguably worse than whatever has been washing up from Southern Asia in the past few years.
>>221374261Well, he means this. West was the main source of pollution before Asia accelerated.
>>221374340>his logic is probably that most damage was done in the victorisn erathat stopped being true a good decade ago, China, Indonesia, the US and Nigeria are the ones necrotising our planet
>>221374519Here the biggest immigrant groups are ruskies, ukies and Cuban gusanos. I am not worried at all about jeets "replacing" me any time soon. But I have heard your cunt tree is basically doing southeast Asian kafala, so RIP.
>>221374510how pakistan or india was allowed nukes is beyond me>>221374585im aware but just guessing his logic
>>221373704This stat doesn't track how many of them actually make it to adulthood. I bet it's not that many considering their level of development.
>>221374629Pakistan and India were allowed nukes but not Taiwan. Just remember that when ww3 starts.
How do Nigerians pay for their living expenses? And what do they do for retirement planning
>>221374519>Who is "we" and why do you speak on behalf of Europeans? They may well need to, however we got to close down bugger all, because these people of various brown shades are just going to replace our already existing lower classes, which are arguably worse than whatever has been washing up from Southern Asia in the past few years.why are you blaming people of other colors when it is your rulers who enabled and pursued job outsourcing?
>>221374648Their retirement planning is making more kids. Those children take care of their parents in their old age, if any of them even live that long with the healthcare they have. Europe and Asia had the same model in medieval times.
I doubt the estimation is accurate for this. Recently, Laos pop estimation was off by 1m after census
>>221373885That's not true, you can go read the travel board on Nairaland. They plot there, apply for university in shit countries like Finland, then they plan to move to Germany the first chance they get because of free movement within the EU. They plot this openly, before even leaving Nigeria. I used to like lurking Nairaland until their true dishonest nigger nature was revealed to me on that board.
>>221374601>I have heard your cunt tree is basically doing southeast Asian kafala, so RIPIsn't it the same in Serbia? I heard that Croatia also gets lots of jeets & co as well as SEA midgets. The biggest immigrant groups are Moldovans and Ukies, but they aren't particularly relevant for the job market. Some of them look old money enough that they stick out like a sore thumb lmao. The jeets and SEAns have taken over the delivery jobs and it's not an exaggeration, but they also do busywork in roadwork teams that are laying pipes or asphalt. They are very hard working and have the mindset of a slave, no complaints here.Local gopniks and balkan mystery meat types are worse, that's why I don't care if we get flooded, how much worse could it get?
>>221374664I didn't blame anyone. You are reading into my post as if it was written by a /pol/ack with an agenda. My choice of words doesn't align with the reddit sanctioned semantics. By "various brown shades" I meant "Global South"
>>221374769In Croatia it began decades ago. In Sewerbia very very recently, but our government has trouble keeping jeets here due to how low salaries are. They work here for a year and escape into the EU or wherever they can really, even your cunt tree. Vucic devised a scheme with some Chinese companies to debt trap them and keep them in camps but even those end up escaping due to EU human rights subversion etc.Median salary here is lower than in urban India btw.
>>221374764Can confirm, most nigerians I've met have since then moved to Germany.
>>221374869>Median salary here is lower than in urban India btw.I had no idea lol. Maybe that's why we get only the peasants who don't even know a trade.
>>221373753>I know climate change will make the tropicsEverywhere will be fucked. There's fucking current collapse going on inmthe Atlantic that will make European winters much worse and summer spikes much higher.
>>221374764>I used to like lurking Nairaland until their true dishonest nigger nature was revealed to me on that board.People mkve for bettwr opportunities. That's like getting made at people on Canada getting long distance jobs with American firms over working locally.
>>221375714>still quoting the fucking Day After Tomorrow Hollyslop as climate scienceGoogle "Cold summer, warm winter effect". European winters will not get noticeably colder because the pace of rapid heating in the overall climate system will outpace the potential freezing caused by the decline of the AMOC. Once ice melts it takes the same amount of energy to take it from 1 degree C to 84C as it did to get it from minus one to one degree. Just think about that, -1 to 1 takes the same energy as 1 to 84. No massive freeze will happen. That means my area will be like Morocco basically, but what can you do.
>>221375920>Day After Tomorrow Hollyslop as climate scienceAre you dumb? The ocean currents that moderate and control the climate for entire regions is going to collapse due to climate change. Which means a lot more weather extremes and entrie regions across continents losing out on key seasonal precipitation. No one is spared from it.
>>2213760411/2Yes, I copied this from plebbit, read at your own peril>To be honest, I tend to lean towards not being convinced that any form of significant net cooling is plausible under future warming, regardless of how ocean circulation changes. It's a hypothetical that makes sense in theory but not in practice, and it feels somewhat disingenuous at this point that some insist on doubling down on the "it can still get colder in some places" hypothesis. The trouble is that the bulk of ocean models apply a dubious relation between meridional heat transport and volumetric overturning, so they're effectively inherently biased towards representing the conventional "conveyor belt" analogy which has always postulated that overturning circulation is the primary form of ocean heat transport, of which the atmosphere is a passive recipient. So there's a fundamental bias towards over amplifying cooling signals in AMOC reduction/collapse simulations (which itself is further exacerbated by lacklustre atmospheric coupling). This is further compounded by the fact that most prominent figures in this field remain proponents of Stommel's bifurcation model and Broecker's conveyor belt analogy in theoretical AMOC frameworks, but it's a demonstrably oversimplified approach and beginning to really show its limitations as we gather more direct observations.
>>2213762342/2>As an example, Lozier's recent OSNAP data has suggested that Labrador Sea deep water formation is a minor contributor to AMOC variability, which is a significant finding given that the conventional assumption has always been that this was the primary driver of the AMOC. There are multiple similar examples. For the most part, the community has always emphasised that AMOC reduction experiments shouldn't be treated as forecasts or predictions due to structural limitations in the simulation, they're essentially a demonstration of the experiment boundaries. Some will point at cross-model consistency, but this ironically doesn't strengthen the reliability of the output as this generally equates to more standardised experiment framework, which usually results in simplification of variables. I've always found that the net/regional cooling hypothesis is the least productive theory in modern climate change discourse, but it's one of those areas of academia where you'll find that the answer differs depending on who you ask>Edit: forgot the question. Assuming that an AMOC collapse does occur (the manner of collapse itself is up for debate) and the "bipolar seesaw" effect happens with a colder northern hemisphere and warmer southern hemisphere, even the most idealised simulations suggest this would be a temporary situation before a warming trajectory resumes globally. Drijfhout's simulations from 2015 suggested that any net cooling would only persist for a few decades in the Euro-Atlantic region before it's overwhelmed by warming, but their simulations omitted a lot of variables that would have limited that cooling even further.
