[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: rock throw atlas titan.png (894 KB, 1000x1000)
894 KB PNG
nu 'ow
>>
sus
>>
copernicus already open new theory
>>
>>221535983
I dun don get it boss
>>
>>221535983
I don't get it
>>
>>221536148
Rockthrow the nazi says that men literally carry the World. He'a a bit retarded like that.
>>
>>221535983
not even trying to hide it anymore
>>
>>221535983
Abstract amogus today. It's the big shaft of light in the first panel
>>
>>221536335
Oh shit you're right the third oanel on his back
>>
>>221536308
Is he wrong? All the labor intensive work that the world actually depends on is 99.99% men.
Farming?Men.
Construction? Men.
Factories? Men.
Mining? Men.
Fishermen? Men...
Husbandry in general? Men.
Even within the city men do the "dirty work" such as garbagemen, kitchen jobs.
Women occupy mostly office jobs or shit like cashiers
>>
>>221536308
we do though. how do you think earth stays floating?
>>
>>221536409
He is wrong. Most of the physical wprk in the fields you described are done by machines today(which also opens the field to women, ironically). Also you're ignoring all filed where women carry the brunt. And the fact "the World" is so much more than some busywork, you little bourgeoise cretin.
>>
>>221536308
Yo that's fucked up
>>
>>221536505
>which also opens the field to women, ironically
That they still don't do,regardless.
>you're ignoring all filed where women carry the brunt
Yes like wiping old men ass or denying your job application because you didn't look right, yep.
>>
>>221536505
feminists? on my incel chud board?
>>
>>221536505
>opens the field to women, ironically
And still women won't there work further proving his point. I've never seen a single woman on a job site. Ever.
t. Construction welder
>>
>>221536565
You said that you left the construction work why are you lying?
>>
Can we stop this MEN vs WOMEN shit it got old in like toddler school
>>
>people seeking validation just for being part of 50% of human population
>>
>>221536593
I've left it, doesn't mean i was never there. I worked in construction and in my time i didn't see a single woman
>>
>>221536624
Have you worked in all the constructions?
>>
>>221536660
In all constructions ever?
No
>>
>>221536597
HR and other made up administrative positions so women have work aren't contributing anything to society.
Jarvis, show me a breakdown of women's degrees by subject
>>
>>221536409
Truth bomba
>>
>>221536668
I see a lot of women on construction sites but they work in areas like construction supervision, laboratories, design and engineering departments, and the like. It's clear that women won't be throwing dirt and laying bricks they dont have the frame for that. Although my grandmother was a construction crane operator.
>>
>>221536660
>>221536593
Are you trying to say that because he hadn't been to all construction sites since history began he can't be sure?
Dude I walk past a dozen construction sites a week in my city and there's not 1 woman there, nada, zilch.
I've also worked in two farms, and no women worked anything physical, do you know what they did? Cashier and phonecalls.
It's a repeating pattern
>>
>>221536736
>laboratories, design and engineering departments, and the like.
Please show me the gender breakdown of STEM degrees, isn't it like 80-85% men?
>>
>>221536682
Yet a man will never be able to give birth. I do agree a lot of the jobs nowadays especially for women are just daycare for grownups

>>221536736
Well yeah i meant actually working in the manual labour. Of course there are women involved in construction, from architects and engineers to safety supervisors etc. But my point was that despite having advanced technology for manual work, women still won't do it. And it's fine they're women after all.
>>
>>221536807
Advanced technology for manual work? Like what?
>>
>>221536746
>>221536772
Shut up jew
>>
>>221536660
asking an impossible validation proof to a general truth
>>
>>221536409
This is just not true.
>>
>>221536950
Ground compactors, cranes... the list is endless
>>
>>221537050
There's a lot of female crane operators. You know what? I worked in a bit of constructions over last five years and I noticed that there's never young men in actual construction jobs. Its always 35+ guys, and much older. Can we say that young men don't work in construction either?
>>
>>221536950
You have exoskeletons today that make the physical load of carrying heavy things much easier.
Women's frame is no longer a real excuse
>>
>>221537134
Yeah absolutely
>>
>>221537134
This proves that young man are a minority
>>
girls go to jupiter to get more stupider
>>
>>221536308
>>221536505
Ywnbaw
>>
>>221536746
גם אם יש אישה אז היא ישר נכנסת לתפקיד פיקוח/ניהול, היא לא מתחילה מלמטה.
הוא שהיא מפעילה מיכון כלשהו ללא מאמץ פיזי
>>
>>221535983
Is Stoney going through his neo-pagan nazi phase like Sinfest? Did one too many women reject our favorite aryan spic?
>>
>>221536308
dey do doe?
>>
>>221536308
Women empathetically self insert. That means that they deeply relate to a character based on certain superficial characteristics, and then inhabit that character emotionally. That’s why women care more about characters being the same race as them, or being customizable in vidya, or whatever. It’s how they prefer to enjoy stories in many cases. Therefore, good things that happen to female characters are more directly felt by women audiences. They are inhabiting the character directly on an emotional level, so if the character is rich, or pretty, or powerful, that is direct appeal.
Men logically relate to characters. They relate to characters based on the degree, to which they agree with them, the degree to which they are similarly motivated to them, and the degree to which they find them interesting or entertaining. However, they don’t inhabit the character most of the time. Since the connection is logical and not empathetic, they tend to view the story from the protagonists perspective, but things that happen to the protagonist are still generally perceived as happening to a different individual. In action series, the main character is usually powerful and skilled and handsome. James Bond, for instance. In a romance series directed towards otaku, however, the appeal would be substantially harmed if audiences saw the main character as superior to them. By having meek, middlingly attractive, main characters that the audience feels superior to, even though they receive female attention, it gives the impression that the otaku could as well, seeing as he is superior. A male otaku that views a more handsome, more rich man get a girl in an anime feels jealousy, not victory.
>>
kek you retards will argue about anything
>>
>>221536409
Men also start wars and have caused all the major disasters in human history.
>>
>>221536308
because we all have a deep-seated sexual resentment of women due to lifetimes of bad experiences with them, and so we find great satisfaction in the idea of a situation where a women spreads her legs and exposes her pudenda to a man she likes, thinking she can so easily entice him with this seashore-smelling abalone, as if saying “here are my floppy gorilla lips, here is my swollen monkey ass, gaze upon my swollen lust-hole that looks like somebody Mike Tyson just punched in the face, I bestow its piscine radiance upon thee” and he’s just like “damn nigga das nasty” thereby causing her heart, mind, and unwarranted sense of self-importance to turn into something like a fresh piece of blackboard chalk that is gently slipped out of the box and then flung with incredible force against a glazed tile floor
>>
>>221536308
>Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.
>Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.
>Words like “self-confidence,” “self-reliance,” “initiative,” “enterprise,” “optimism,” etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone’s problems for them, satisfy everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.
>>
File: 1774729807038378.jpg (112 KB, 781x1024)
112 KB JPG
>>221536308
I'm not the oldest anon but I have interacted with a lot of women in my life. I love my wife, my mom, my sister, my cousins, grandmothers, aunts, etc. I have worked with women, for women, and women have worked for me. I am friends with women. I have dated dozens of women. I went to college with women. Worked on projects with women. Overall, I have had (guessing) thousands upon thousands of both passive and intimate interactions with women.
That being said, I can conclude without any doubt whatsoever that women are inferior both physically and intellectually to men in every measurable way. If you want to be successful in interacting with women it is best to treat them like children. This is not just for romantic relationships but any interaction you have with them.
In my experience, women don’t desire responsibility in any genuine way, especially long-term. That is actually okay because they really aren’t supposed to. Provision and responsiblity are attributes for men. Women that pretend to be resposible (i.e. “girl boss” or women CEOs) pursue these endeavors because they hate men (they want to “prove” something)
Look at what happens when women accumulate resources.
What happens when you give a ten year old $20? They spend it right away! They spend it on something frivolous with no thought or regard about their future or how to enrich the lives of the people around them.
"Her money is her money and my money is her money"
Men on the other hand work and provision resources to share with the family. Women do not do this. They would rather buy a new pair of shoes or handbag than fix up the family car or home maintenance - "that's what his money is for"
Want to be more successful with women? Treat and speak to them like children! Once I realized this, all my anxiety to approach and interact with women went out the window. They WANT to be treated like a child because they are as emotionally mature as one
>>
brazilian chudout
>>
sorry not reading wall of text
>>
>>221536308

Shut the fuck up you massive faggot
>>
>>221536409
They employ women as garbage collectors in the Jewnited States, though. It was very weird to see



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.