What went so horribly wrong?
>>221572061The white people left.
>>221572134Stupid
>>221572134/thread
>2 of the lowest 5based
rwanda sisters weren't we supposed to be 1st world?
>>221572061The white racists colonized the BBC or something
notice how the most dangerous places are all nomadic and desert shitholes?
>>221572134FPBP
>>221572580Sandy bbc tastes the saltiest I’ve heard but the Muslims there circumsized themselves so it ruins the true fermented desert BBC dessert
>>221572134This KEK.And now they are crying for Russian and Chinese help.
>>221572061no suitable political tradition or real nation to uplift over one's family/friends (ultra corruption)
>>221572630You can be smug but you can't deny all the French did was produce quasi-resource extractors that set up the colonies for failure upon independence.Even Rhodesia's plan would have resembled a latinx shithole in 2026, but don't pretend France was setting any of their slaves for success too.An actual African success story *despite* centuries of torture would be Botswana and Ghana, the real failures of their own making is Somalia and Doctor Congo (Zaire)
>>221572061It doesnt help that African countries are mostly multicultural with tons of ethnic groups.I read about Nigeria and they cant reform because tribal politics between the ethno-religious group is so strong.Rwanda is the Sub-Saharan country with a bright future but their geography is shit (landlocked, no natural resources or bountiful land)
>>221572134
>>221572134Nigga white people are the people who CAUSED the problem, they left Africa with a broken political system, AND divided territories into countries that never should have been countries to begin with>>221572712
Given that birth rates in Asia are rapidly collapsing so there will be no young chinkettes soon, will Africa become the new sex tourism hub?
Imagine if Africans came to Europe and spent three centuries enslaving and then stripmining your people and land and forming them into unnatural political constructs about as valid as Belgium and then one day they all just up leave and leave the Frenchmen and Germans in the new nation of Alsace-Lorraine to fight over who gets to rule the country. In>ummmm but we gave them hospitals and railroads between the port and the iron mine and rubber plantationA lot of good that did them.
>>221573087Are you a female nigger? Do you love white boys?
>>221572061White people forced diversity onto them
>>221572061lots of thingslack of educationneo colonialismlack of understanding how to run a state with unstable institutes instability
>>221573115you forgot niggers
>>221573322>tfw you saged the thread cause you're too pussy someone would @(you) for saying niggerspathetic
>>221573322what do you mean, i always think of moroccans when it comes to the shame of Africa
>>221573322Blacks are better than Moroccans. I don't want them as immigrants neither, but if I have to chose Moroccans or Kenyans, I'd chose Kenyans.
>>221572933Africans have had 60+ years to change their political systems and redraw their borders if they wished. But let me guess, the invisible hand of the colonizers still holds sway over the Congo, even through Europe can barely project power within its own borders
>>221573701>Africans have had 60+ years to change their political systems and redraw their borders if they wished. But let me guess, the invisible hand of the colonizers still holds sway over the Congo, even through Europe can barely project power within its own bordersHmm... sounds like slavs and Russia...
>>221573717Yes. We redrew our borders, changed our systems and in most Slav countries the GDP has grown like 1000% since 1990
>>221573701>But let me guess, the invisible hand of the colonizers still holds sway over the Congo, even through Europe can barely project power within its own bordersThe US is arming Congo against Rwanda after the former agreed to sign over mineral rights. Retards think because the map isn't red, blue, and green means westerners aren't still interfering in those countries.
>>221573786Are they forcing Congo to buy weapons? Are they forcing ANY African country to whore its minerals out? How come Norway doesn't have Trump or Putin or Xi stealing their oil or arming them against their enemies?
>>221573811No one is forcing Ukraine to sell their country off to buy foreign weapons but the alternative is to get raped. That's what happens when you're in an geopolitically unstable region and not a hugbox. Whoring their minerals out is one of the only reliable ways to get money or aid and you're fooling yourself if you think any western country wants to see African countries develop to the point where they don't have to accept exploitative deals with foreigners anymore. Just look at Trump throwing temper tantrums over Nigeria.>How come Norway doesn't have Trump or Putin or Xi stealing their oil or arming them against their enemies?Because Norway isn't in danger of being at war with Sweden or Denmark or Finland.
>>221573701Europeans are keeping the multicultural blobs alive because the blobs maintained their minerals rights and groups who want to secede always face difficult odds.It's like if all the great powers of Europe supported Turkey in Bulgaria's war of independence.You can blame Africans for a lot of things but they truly got fucked over with the borders.
>>221573087Europeans only colonized Africa for around 80 years, if you compare to India or Indonesia, they been there much longer but those countries still more successful than Africa
>>221572134Honestly what did colonialism even do for Africa that they couldn't have just acquired by trade? It was a proven waste of money for the French for example, and Africans didn't benefit by having their existing power structures destroyed in favor of European ones. It was just a loss-loss really. Contractors could have just built infrastructure instead. China is already doing way more today than most colonial powers ever did for Africa relative to the time period they lived in.
>>221574308Like look at Ethiopia. Maybe they're poor but they're not significantly poorer than the rest of Africa. And the Amharas were themselves colonists (few understand)
>>221574253India (and to a lesser extent Indonesia) had preexisting traditions of centralized government, heavily shared cultural tradition, and arguably being colonized for so long not only gave them time to integrate into and eventually learn from western systems of government but gave them time to form a unified national identity in contrast to their colonizers that was able to cut across religious and cultural divisions.Africa had none of that, so when colonization ended you have a bunch of people being told to take over a state apparatus they've barely been a part of and where everyone still identifies with their tribe more than being "Nigerian" or "Gambian" and your state borders not only have zero logic for which ethnic groups they include but also cut straight through existing ethnic identities.
>>221572061Fr*nch colonialist oppression keeping the region poor while stealing their ressource to hoard them in their shithole through CFA and franceafrique>>221574308China and Russia are helping africa develop and break free from fr*nch colonialist yoke. Meanwhile zogged western countries want to keep those countries weak and poor
>>221573701No they havent because fr*nce and western imperialist in generals kept sabotaging and killing off good leaders like sankara
>>221574067You blamed everything on multicultural borders, even though Indonesia and India, which are similar to many African countries in that they are former colonial administrative constructs — have proven to be much more stable states. This shows that multiculturalism can work. The failures of African countries probably come from piling up problems or something else entirely.
>>221572933But those countries worked when white people were in charge. As soon as white people left they went to shit.
>>221574530Yes because india and indonesia kicked out their western colonizers. Africa sidnt manage to kick french locusts yet. Except in Algeria were we crushed french shits completely which is why we are doing so much better than the rest
>>221574530Black history is just suffering forever. It's kinda shameful
The black man is the holiest cow in leftism. He outranks even jews, the crrators of this sort of politics, on the oppression totem pole. The negro man is the lefts most cheerished thing. And its onmy the man. Leftist sont give a shit about black women or children who suffers the most under the black mans chimp like natureGenuinely what do leftoids see in them thats so important?
are nafris the Aryans of africa? they mogg the shit out of bantus both historically and now. to the point that blacks right now larp es morrocans or egyptians LMAO
>>221573087>american education first, the africans were the ones doing the enslaving. europeans stopped them. africans wanted to keep going as it made them a lot of moneysecond, the proper colonization phase lasted like a century at best.third, why does nobody ever blame the insanely retarded post-independence policies that were tried by those countries? like muh african comunism
>>221574530India is an even worse shithole than Africa and are stuck in limbo as well.Indonesia is 80% muslim with a dominant Java ethnic group. Burma is more multicultural and look what's happening to them.Meanwhile this is the ethnic composition of the average West African cunt, plus in terms of faith it's 50/50 Muslim and Christians instead of different denominations of one faith.
>>221574716Africa communism would have worked if not for fr*nch meddling again look up cfa. The retarded post independance policies were set up by france and their zionist allies to destroy africa from within
What is there to be proud of when it comes to being black? What's the pride in being one of the most discriminated against, downtrodden, poorest, unlucky, groups in the world with hundreds of years of constant suffering and seemingly no improvement in sight?
>>221574641That didn't happen. The Dutch crushed the Indonesian revolt before America forced them to give up their empire. In India, the British simply granted independence without a major fight because they were bankrupted. Also, French meddling in West Africa is exaggerated.>>221574656The thing is, African countries have very young median ages, and their populations have continued to grow rapidly since independence. It’s hard for new states to manage such fast-growing populations. I think once this subsides, they will have a better chance.
>>221574826They kicked out their european oppressor still. This has not happened in africa yet where fr*nce continues to loot ressources and destroy country though francafrique.Look up caspian reports video where he lists all the oppressive maneuvers used by frog shits to keep africa poor
>>221572558>>221572620White American boys cannot think of anything but black cocks, they envy them and make mention of them whenever they can.
All you have to do is look at the success of Botswana to realize: "Yeah white people are the problem" They kept corruption and European capitalist influence out and prevented their attempts to sabotage their nation, and they're the richest country in Africa, makes ya think.
>>221572061100% fr*nce/whites fault. All the richest parts are the one that kicked french out. Mashallah with Russia help we will deal with the french colonists once and for all
