Germans made a movie on "what if hitler came back" but they actually turned him in to a beloved, sensible character so they made him kill a dog in the movie and then delivered a whole speech of "you can't like this man because you just can't, okay?"
>>221575184We do that in ze Germany.
>>221575184It's based on a book. The entire point is that he is sensible and has a way with words so that you want to follow him.
>>221575282>you're not supposed to listen to the straight-shootin, sense-making throwback personalities because if you do you might get tricked into falling for Hitler again
>>221575480The warning is that if liberal society cannot provide actual solutions to real problems, people will put someone with any solution in charge. Nobody actually cares about muh gay rights or whatever if they can't put food on the table.
>>221575282Remember, always think for yourself unless it's a retarded out of touch woman spouting obvious preferential solipsist bullshit with a very visible anti human narcissist agenda, and then worship and agree with her. Otherwise you're fascist.
>>221575565>The warning is that if liberal society cannot provide actual solutions to real problemsThe problem in modern age is that human rights mean that abdul with his 60 iq and 6 wives torturing animals with halal slaughter is on the same level as you. Liberal mindset is that we literally believe Abdul would magically get some sense and magic powers by just putting a foot on our soil and that he will forget about all his dumb shit.
>>221575637May Allah decide your fate
>>221575863
>>22157518490 minutes limits what you can do. Doing a deep dive on the allure of nazism and then building a case against it is a thing that real historians fail at sometimes. Killing of a dog as a shorthand for regime brutality is of course using nazi-like propaganda to debunk nazism which is ironic.They wanted to do Borat with barely any understanding of Borat's (and their own) premise.
>>221575565What are you talking about? Trans rights are at the top of everyone's agenda.
>they made him kill a dog in the movie Lmao.
>>221575184Nazis lost, evil lost, allies won, good won, simple as
>>221575184It was a good film.
>>221576595>film>>221575184>movieturns out the entire atlantic is less of a gap than the english channel
>>221575480you are the actual cattle that caused the world to be this shit btw and got shit like trickle down economics to be mainstream
>>221575184>Hitler was LE BADincredible how jews are still butthurt about this man after 80 years. He was right about everything
>>221575184>those scenes were people are waving or saluting or heil hitlering I wonder how much of that was acted.
>>221575637>abdul with his 60 iq and 6 wives torturing animalsyou are ok to have a business with abdul who has a lot of us$ paper in exchange for oil, do not assert sanctions against him in UN, and you are still whining?is hypocrisy one of the european phenotypes?
>>221575184>killing a dogof all the things they could have made hitler do to vilify him, they chose the most unbelievable one. couldn't they just let him on a schizophreniac racist or antisemitic tirade or make him addicted to drugs so that it actually makes sense?
>>221576828It was kino actually
>>221578375Writer here, killing/saving an animal is a screenwriting trope. When you write there's actually a limited number of ideas for any screenplay situation. Writing an animal killing scene to vilify the bad guy shows that you're an inexperienced, rushed or dumb writer. A writer should be able to look at this, examine it and find a workaround.
Why are posts ITT also copy pasted into this thread on /tv/ >>>/tv/220554724
>>221579192because i browse both boards and get paid making double the posts
>>221579769>a l*af was behind it
