This thread is a no sigger zone. Post and discuss any and all guns EXCEPT sigs
>>64177175Why is it still the perfect handgun even 100 years after it's last major upgrade?
>>64177175The 320 stands for the number of times it'll go off by itself in its service.
>>64177246Because John Moses Browning pbuh was given the design vi adivine inspiration from God himself.
>>64177175This is discrimination which is absolutely insane to witness in the year 2025! All guns are beautiful and we shouldn't discriminate! OP is a firearms hitler! >kisses his P220
Don't have one and don't really want one, but if I ever find a used one for under $200 then I'll probably slick it up.
>>64178790Why the fuck did I write slick? Maybe I'll not pick it up. Making me retarded over here.
>>64177175I recently found out that the Australian’s made a AR derivative and I thought that’s pretty cool, I wonder if it will ever get adopted by the ADF?https://www.lithgowarms.com/acar/
Was the ACR all it was hyped up to be?
>7 posts by this OP
>>64178845>used by the ADF?likely, but only likely by spec ops cunts and you might find some of the police tac units getting them.
thots on this stock? I want something such that I don't have to use my cheek but with standard height optics/irons
>>64182368Based on the other amazon-tier accessories I’m going to assume it’s dogshit.
>>64178780>not fg42ngmi
>>64177175
>>64188155checked,Look 2 posts up
>>64178848from what I heard, no.
>>64177916old Germany-built SIG handguns are fine, as is any Swiss-built SIG.whatever the company/people in charge of the post-2009 slopbrand is, isn't 'SIG'
/k/ is too chickenshit for this topic
How about that DAC 394?
since the rest of /k/ isn't posting guns
>>64177246Because fools ask questions that wise men have already answered
>>64190633Yeah I refuse to use (((Ron Cohen's))) pronouns. Always say nu-SIG to differentiate.
>>64193292>nu-SIGgot it thanks anon
trying hard to keep the meme alive, huh?
>>64194748>triggered
>>64179064Proof?
>>64177246>picrel : Remington Randlove 'em
aww poor /k/they don't like this thread
>>64178848No, but the XCR was.
>>64177175post guns that are objectively safer the p320.I'll go first.0 lawsuits, 0 recorded injuries, 0 recorded holstered discharges
>>64202780nice
>>64190612I already have an SP5, but I kind of want to buy an AP5 so I can rice one out while keeping the other one in an old school configuration.
