[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: mac-11.mybeloved.jpg (67 KB, 474x601)
67 KB
67 KB JPG
I LOVE MAC-11 SO MUCHH MWAMWAMWAA
ITS SO SMALL AND CUTE AND FASTT
>>
>>64181880
These things used to be like $300 bucks, why did Boomers get to have all the fun?
>>
>>64181880
The only reason we idolize these is because we can't own them. If full-auto was legal, we'd treat MACs and Tec-9s the same way we treat SCCY, Lorcin, Jimenez, and Raven Arms.
>>
>>64182079
>why did Boomers get to have all the fun?
there really isn't a hobby, profession or life experience that this wouldn't apply to, outside of video games I guess.
>>
>>64182249
if money were no option I'd probably get an MP9 over a MAC, but I do think MACs look cool in their own way and an MP9 is about 7x more expensive assuming MACs went for $300. it's kinda hard to deny the benefit of being able to afford a MAC + $1800-2000 of 9mm for the price of an MP9.
>>
>FASTT
That's the problem (with a .380 ACP submachine gun)
>>
>>64181880
If we could get them full-auto, then the MAC would go up in price for the simple fact that full-auto-capable guns need a tougher bolt and barrel than semi-auto-only guns. I doubt it'd be less than $900. Almost all fully automatic-capable weapons would be in the $1k-3k range. Which is still better than paying $10k-50k for a transferable MG that was made before 1986.
>>
>>64182554
>outside of video games I guess
Millennials got this one
>>
>>64182703
it's true. if you were born after 1998 you're getting sloppy seconds
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (248 KB, 1280x720)
248 KB
248 KB JPG
Anyone else think the 9mm is ugly with the elongated back end? Why is it like that anyway. The 45 and 380 ones look good with that shoe box shape.
>>
File: 1734676285609127.jpg (656 KB, 1200x1015)
656 KB
656 KB JPG
>>64182079
>why did Boomers get to have all the fun?
that's a long conversation anon
but lets just say jews
>>
>>64184419
The M10 is enormous compared to the M11 or M11/9, so while it looks short, it is actually just really tall. The M11/9 is longer to keep the RPM from going totally insane. Mac 10s feel horrible in hand but both of the SWD Macs (11 and 11/9) feel way better because they are so much shorter.
>>
>>64184419
>>64185050
never saw the point of M11/9
Original Ingram M10 in either .45 or 9, and M11 in .380
>>
>>64185853
Weighs half as much as an M10 and has a higher volume of fire. The Ingram M10s are the "nicest" of the guns but that means nothing. Nowadays the thing that makes the M11/9 by far the best is the aftermarket.
Tungsten bolt that drops the gun to 600 RPM? Check
Upper that takes Suomi drums? Check
Drop in 22 bolt and barrel? Check
AR15 adaptor that lets you run any AR bolt and barrel in it with adjustable gas? Check.
The M11 is probably the most practical from a stock perspective because it's the only one that weighs in the same range as a normal pistol, the M10 just feels wrong in hand, it's too tall and the bolt weighs so much that it's much harder to control than the SWD guns.
Pic related, friend trying full auto the first time with my 22 setup.
>>
OMGG MY FIRST POST TYSM FOR THE SUPPORT
>>
>>64182079
Boomers as a culture exist for transferring or enjoying everything that was ever good to themselves, and pulling up the ladder for anyone behind them.
Inexpensive housing, healthcare, and food? Fuck you, we get those things, give me $800k if you want to buy my clapped out shitbox home.
Inexpensive guns? Full auto guns? Fuck you, pay me $50,000 for my transferable full auto.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.