Glock sisters, I don't feel so good.....
>>64184378Glock isn't so based I guess.Even if they're the best handguns.
Didn't they change the Gen 5 design specifically to make DIAS more difficult/impossible?I remember hearing that and it was swept under the rug pretty fast. If true I can't see how any here can support Glock.
>>64184378Literally what changes? What were they supposed to say?
>>64184378I don't know why anyone would be shocked the brand that has the most government issued pistol doesn't give a shit about civilians. They sell to damn near every military and PD with a pulse. Do you think the 2nd amendment accounts for even a percent of their yearly sales? Do you think they'd give a shit if guns were banned here tomorrow?
>>64184378>company makes money selling product>someone does illegal thing with product (yes I know, SHALL and all that)>company denounces the illegal thing to continue making moneyI have no clue what you people thought they'd say.
>>64184454What the actual fuck are you talking about?
>>64184460there also a euro company. they don't give a shit about the 2A.
>>64184454Yes? >>64184471Well they clearly do if they keep seeling it.
>>64184475all they see in the American market is profit. they have no ideological reasons for selling to civilians. handguns could be banned and all they would care about is there lost profits.
>>64184475They care that they keep making money off it. If someone banned Glocks by name, Glock wouldn't continue to try and sell their products because "shall" Glock would just shrug and withdraw from that market.
>>64184487>>64184494Are you saying they should give them away for free. You don't know a single person working there. And what would you want an European company to do about American laws, are you alright buddy? What would you like them to do?
>>64184465That glock already makes their buck with government contracts. Civvie sales aren't shit to them so they have no real financial incentive to support 2a and as a result take anything that isn't the most pro-LEO stance possible in the situation>>64184460That too, it's the politically correct response to the situation. Personally I would've said nothing if I were in their shoes, maybe give an implied thumbs up. But I understand their main market is LEO/MIL, so applauding an act of law enforcement- especially one that includes their product- is the best PR they can get after the chinks made their pistol a MG
Fuck Glock
>>64184503>Are you saying they should give them away for freethat is a whole new sentence. no, I don't want that. I'm saying they don't care about you and this isn't surprising.
>>64184511>Civvie sales aren't shit to themsource? If that was the case they wouldn't waste millions on civ marketing and shipping then?And how would you like them to support it?
>>64184378>makes a plastic piece of shit that jams in over half of the recorded shootings it's involved in>payrolls more gun legislationFuck Glock. Never buying one again and selling the one piece of hot garbage i unfortunately own.
>>64184503>t. Corporate cocksuckerWe're just saying they don't give a fuck about our rights and only sell to us because they see a potential source of revenue and nothing more. If a handgun ban happened tomorrow glock wouldn't spend a penny on any lawyer or advocacy group to get that law changed
>>64184503>>64184522are you shilling? because I already own a glock. I like glock but I understand that as a European company standing up for the 2A isn't something there ever going to do.
I wonder if FaggotTripp or Nigg Stoeger will make vids about this. Or does Glock get a pass?
>>64184450Have some balls and demand donate to candidates that would support legislation for them to sell 18s themselves
>>64184534>>64184530>>64184547>weYou're alone here my guy.And how would you like them to stand up? They're an european company that has nothing to do with American laws. I've asked this 3 times already and you can't seem to answer such a simple question. >because they see a potential source of revenue and nothing moreI thought civ sales didn't matter. Oh you didn't provide the source, then I accept your concession?
>>64184548>They're an european company that has nothing to do with American lawswhat are (YOU) trying to say? because I think I'm saying the same thing.
>>64184548>And how would you like them to stand up?He's never said or implied he wants them to 'stand up'.
>>64184573>>64184565schizo moment
>>64184579think again retard
what are you guys expecting? did you even read this? nowhere does it say "we are changing the design (lol as if glock) to prevent installing switches" its all "grrr we hate illegal machine gun devices too!!" if anything its them going "not my problem lol btw we sue third parties for using our brand name so were helping!" sometimes I forget you guys are teenagers who have never worked in a professional field
>>64184616>>64184450They're openly supporting gun control you faggot.
>>64184548All I'm saying is glock is one of if not the largest handgun manufacturers in the world, easily bringing home way more money than any other pistol maker in the game by a country mile. Meanwhile you don't see them spending a dime advocating for looser laws in their native Austria to sell more pistols to Austrians. If they don't give a shit about domestic civilian sales, what makes you think they'd lose any sleep over losing whatever pittance sales to us nets them?>>64184616Don't get me wrong, it's an expected and completely understandable move on their behalf. Saying anything else would rock the boat which would be bad for them and staying silent would be passing on some excellent free PR. I'm not upset with glock's official position, just stating the reality that the US civilian market is second place in their eyes and they wouldn't take an opportunity to do even the most meager of 2A advocacy even if they had an absolute lay up of a case
>>64184625they're euros. what do you expect?
>>64184436why is everyone ignoring this?I also heard they updated gen 5 to make switches not work but never saw any proof either way.
>>64184679I heard that to, but I also heard it does almost nothing to stop it. but to put it frankly I don't care. it's like the Colt cuck wall, on principle it's bad but it doesn't really matter.
>>64184692im not saying it really matters and im not one of the retards ITT thinking glock would say "oh yeah we are making switches and sending them to the hood". I'm just wondering what the actual change was.
>>64184642What I expect is for anyone that's been giving Sig shit to hold Glock to the same standard for the 2A community. Failure on that tells us that you're all shills and niggers.
>>64184378based Glock supporting more laws to put niggers wit switches in jail forever
>>64184378kek thank God I never bought any of their crap despite the fact that everyone in the online gun community shills Glock relentlessly. I’m unironically gonna buy another HK now.>>64184770It’ll never happen. The Glock fanboys are already coping and denying. They’ve been seething about Sig for the past eight years thinking that spreading memes about the P320 will force the government to redo the XM17 MHS trials. The overwhelming majority of Sig hate comes from Glocktards who thought that their pet handgun deserved to replace the M9 (it’s not enough that FBI HRT and USSOCOM already replaced their 1911s and P226s with G19s). They actually think there was a conspiracy between Big Army and Sig Sauer to rob Glock of the MHS contract despite the fact that Sig won because it offered the government a lower cost per unit than Glock (the same reason Beretta beat Sig back in the 80’s). Glock fanboys are like Hillary voters.
>>64185287IT WAS GASTON'S TURN
>>64184460They're also trying to get ahead of the issue because a bunch of cities and gun control groups are lining up lawsuits claiming their pistols are too easy to convert into machineguns. Glock tried to get one suit dismissed in Minnesota but that was rejected earlier this month and it's going forward.
>>64184378>We don't have shit to do with people ordering illegal glizzy switches from wish.com. If it makes you feel better we support you passing state laws to make already Federally illegal machineguns double illegal.Literally what else is a company supposed to say? Glocks have gotten a lot of heat from people as the modern gangster gun, so yeah they are going to point out all the illegal mods are from China and that they operate above board.
>>64184378That letter is Perfection®
>>64184454This is unfortunately true for the vast majority of major arms manufacturers now. Especially with the "legal liability" angle some anti-gun activists are pushing. Want to treat em like cigarette companies.Really what we need is legislation protecting gun companies from indirect liability in civilian crimes, and you'll probably see the situation turn around. As it stands, however, every gun in a civilian's hands is considered a potential legal disaster - and yes I must emphasize how fucking stupid this is.
>>64184616>>64184642dudes point is valid. its just glock supporting existing laws on books. did you happen to notice the language used though???>MCD, machine-gun conversion devicesnowhere did it mention>Forced Reset Triggers
>>64185725Fuark glawk
>>64184378>austrian firm selling all around the world>muh US 2nd amend'mont why What the fuck are you talking about ?
>>64186487siggers ITT are grasping at anything they can hold against Glock
>>64184534>2A isn't something there ever going to do.Zoomer retard, before the federal AWB went into effect Glock focused US production on cranking out as many full capacity magazines as humanly possible so they could be grandfathered in. This is around the same time American companies like S&W and Ruger were actively cooperating with antigunners in hopes of landing federal contracts. Hillary Hole? Bill Ruger? Fucking newfags
>>64186493>>64186487>Glockniggs excusing anti-gun behavior. You're worse than the war tourists.
>>64184436>>64184679>>64184692>>64184695all they did was add a little plastic nub on the back of the frame that gets in the way of the sear trip. all you have to do is cut the plastic nub off.
>>64187886forgot to add that the nub helps a little bit with preventing debris from getting into the gun. I don't know why it wasn't there before for that reason, I don't know of glock selling factory switches. I think it was just cheaper to manufacture the frames without it
>>64184537>t. Salty Sigger
>64188499>supports anti-gun companies
>glock sistersMore like cock sisters, horse cock that is.
>>64184770People don't hate sig because they are anti-gun, it's because they make at best guns with middling QC and at worst guns that maim you. And they gaslight you into believing otherwise.
>>64188641This. I'd rather buy products from serious gun manufacturers like Sig, Beretta, and H&K rather than give my money to a company that's been coasting by resting on their laurels with the market share they captured 30 years ago so they can employ antigun lawyers and people who jerk off horses all day. Glock predictably went to shit after their founder and namesake died just like Kalashnikov did in Russia.
>>64185205No gun accessory should be illegal nigger/pigger
>>64184770Sig nothing. You just know half of these people were screeching about Hillary holes and Springfield armory being traitors.
>Nigg Stoeger licking Glocks bootsWhat a fucking surprise.
>>64185701>Really what we need is legislation protecting gun companies from indirect liability in civilian crimesThe Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act has been on the books for 20 years.
>>64185706That legislation already exists, and US anti-gunner seethe about it regularly. Despite all it really doing is explicitly pointing out the same protections for other product liability also apply to guns, it gets framed as if gun companies have extra double protection since anti-gunners furiously wish to sue gun companies out of existence.
>>64189048He's a loser, and nobody would give his half-witted opinions any time if he couldn't shoot
>>64184378Fuck yamudda
>>64188756>serious gun manufacturers like Beretta, and H&Kftfy
ok but what does this legislation actually do
>>64189983Who cares, we're being outraged here
>>64190194I mean for all we know this legislation could just be them covering their own ass removing liability for the nig-o-matics, has anyone actually read what it does?does it actually affect anyone in any negative way at all?
>>64190505From what I gather, there's no actual state-level ban on machineguns in Oklahoma since they're illegal at the Federal level.But Federal courts are refusing to prosecute nogs getting busted with MGs. So it looks like Oklahoma is passing their own state-level law allowing state and local prosecutors can throw the book at them.
>glock gets major contracts>suddenly starts shilling for the governmentYep, the Glock COA is getting even bigger LEO/Mil contracts in the next coming years.
>>64189983Makes switches doubly illegal.
>>64185706>>64189136>furiously wish to sue gun companies out of existenceRemember though we won a big 9-0 victory in the Mexico case earlier this year.yes the billion $$$$$$$ Lawfare campaigns continue in myriad re-spawns but that set a strong precedent.
>>64184386>Even if they're the best handguns
