[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1756491447209780.png (378 KB, 709x708)
378 KB
378 KB PNG
>SAM-500 got droned
>>
File: Bantz.jpg (73 KB, 602x709)
73 KB
73 KB JPG
>>64188759
Proofs?
>>
>>64188794
This. We are talking about the counter-nuclear capabilities. Noone can be that retarded and incompetent.
>>
Bait
>>
Land war, not needed.
>>
A S-500 Radar got droned a month or so ago.
>>
S-500's are meant to intercept ICBMs. Russia would consider and attack on one to be an attack on their nuclear deterrent.
>>
>>64189051
plot twist, they don't have a working nuclear deterrent
>>
>S-500
Where was this? There was a video of an S-400's 91N6 radar getting droned in Crimea yesterday, but an S-500 would be news.
>>
>>64189051
Like all those Tu-95s that got BTFO?
>>
>>64189051
My brown friend, S-500 were hit before already
>>
>>64189071
Not part of the triad. Tu-160's (which were on the same airfield) were specifically left.
>>
File: IMG_6604.jpg (198 KB, 1290x1437)
198 KB
198 KB JPG
>waiting for OP to deliver
>>
>>64189098
Check the 'log tomorow
>>
>>64189051
Well it’s a good thing they didn’t do shit last time one of them got blown up. More empty threats from puccia.
>>
File: Muh NOO-ACK!.png (879 KB, 575x1024)
879 KB
879 KB PNG
>>64189051
Okay, and? Pic relevant.
>>
I want to believe…
>>
But it was droned like on August 5th or something, no?
>>
>>64189549
Yeah one got taken out before, maybe OP is a glowie though and another got hit
>>
>>64189098
Not going to happen, there's only 1 S-500 in existence and I doubt Russia has deployed it
>>
>>64189084
I still think the ukies should have hit one, just to emphasise the point they were making with that
Russians are not known for their grasp of subtlety
>>
There was a successful drone hit, with footage, on an S400 in Crimea a couple of days ago.
https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-hits-radar-system-crimea/

I've not heard about any claimed hits on an S500. OP didn't provide any location either to help us find reports on it as he is a retarded frogposter troglodyte. We all could make threads and say >Shelemov's favourite dildo got droned with some shitty cartoon as well.
>>
>>64189084
What are they going to do even if Ukraine targets TU-160s or S-500s? Glass Kyiv?
>>
>>64191040
Probably what they'll do is they'll drone some old men walking their dogs or send a cruise missile into a maternity hospital, then pay some brownoid scum to gloat and false flag about it on here.
>>
>>64191040
they'll probably start targeting EU assets in Ukraine
>>
>>64192347
Did... Did you not hear about the Russian strike on the EU building in Kyiv?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.