we need to add more bigger external fuel tanks to this thing
>>64198464dont be antisemitic anon
>>64198469is it really a fighter plane if you dont need full blast afterburner + 20km of runway to take off?it needs MORE FUEL TANKS
>>64198464Futa Israeli jets
>>64198464NoBut we need to add tanks that make the shape more female and therefore sexier
>>64198464Here you go bro now yeet WSO and and some more fuel
>>64198464Okay, now hear me out.. What if.. we make a fuel tank in the shape of an airplane?
>>64202323how about some on top of the wing too and more/bigger conformal tanks
>>64202358they even made a fuel tank with a jet engine and wings
>>64202373AHThey beat me to it!
>>64202406wait until they add weapons and a cockpit to it
>>64202364Best i can do bro she can't take it anymore
>>64202456damn thats goodthose elevators will take like 2 minutes to turn and allow the plane to lift with fuel attached to them. those big con formals are beaufitul imagine the range.this thing can take off in tel aviv and strike beijing
>>64202422Sounds very Russian, honestly.I was gonna say Japanese but then I remembered they don't have any balls anymore
>>64198464>more biggerESL
>>64198464Yemen and lran is very far away
>>64202792F16 should be able to take off in tel aviv, drop bombs on caracas and go back home without aerial refueling dependence.
> that much extra drag and weight for no lift just make a biplane fr fr
>>64198464None of the USAF F-16's have CFT's installed, but the newer D models have the big spine
>>64198464I know a US pilot that was hired to deliver those
>>64198464>add more biggerjeetsrael isn't sending its best
>>64198464Have it tow a drop tank-glider
>>64203137
>>64202456damn negro, any photoshop tips this looks legit
>>64202799What did Venezuela do?
>>64198464We've already got these hideous Conformal Fuel Tanks. Anymore and you won't have any capacity left for weapons.> more biggerOof, English fail.
>>64202456kek
>>64202456there are two more hardpoints on wings, add more fuel tanks
>>64205934Like this?>>64203890There is nothing to it you just select and copy
>>64206056please put a jerrycan in the cockpit you know the red ones for gardening equipment
>>64206056Yes, this is way better. Can we move the hardpoints closer, so that it has 8 tanks on wings, instead of 6?
>>64206149Looks scuffed but it works>>64206242Not sure if it’s going to end up looking goofy, but i can try
>>64206319>Looks scuffed but it worksmagnificent anon thanks
>>64206242This looks unhinged
>>64206415Damn...
try mounting them on top of the wing
>>64206442Can’t, I’d need a different asset.
Conformal tank the conformal tanks
>>64198464No Pierce. Jet is fine as is. Go watch Airbus Beluga porn.
>>64206524vgh...
>>64206415
mein sides
>>64206713lmao great minds think alike
>>64206713Radar delete for extra fuel is a nice touch
>>64206319this looks perfect>>64206415this looks like you're joking, what's next fuel tanks for the fuel tanks?
>>64206415double the fuel tanks on "rear wings"
>>64198464In all seriousness, why do they do this? Doesn't the iaf have kc-135s?
>>64207867lots of loiter time over the target is essential for hunting enemies it takes time to spot them, also missions get updated/redirected in real time all the time you cant plan a strike 3h ahead of time by the time you arrive the target isnt there but 10 others might be detected so you need maximum flexibility to change plans on the fly
>>64206675Fuck I'm rock hard now, dont stop
>>64207900Also it looks really fucking sexy
>>64207959I can appreciate the curves(love handles)
>>64207867If all you are doing with the plane is strike missions then the kinematic penalties are unimportant and this gives the plane the ability to bomb without an entire refueling plane involved. It just enhances the plane for the cost of plumbing and tanks, why not?
They could of just made it a little bigger like this.
>>64198464if rumors are true they not only added external drop tanks to the f35 but also conformal fuel tanks extending the rank to insane levels, considering the f35 already has a massive range relative to the previous 1 engine jet.
>>64206773I reckon this baby can bomb the Moon and go back with fuel to spare.
>>64213725honestly they need to drop the kerosene meme and just make the next gen of fighters run on U235
>>64213735Could nuclear jet propulsion be viable for drones, since you don't have a crew that needs radiation shielding?
>>64198464How much does it lose in supersonic performance with these fuel tanks?
>>64215096wrong board, nu/pol/ is down the hall and to the left.
>>64215096Ya gotta go back
