>Germany buying 3500 Patria AMVs>Japan buying 810>Sweden buying 300>New orders from the middle-east? (established ties with UAE)>New Forcit TNT factory underway >New Nammo artillery shell factory underway>Forcit defense ramping up land mine and sea mine production>Britain will probably pick Sako to replace their current assault riflesNo I don't want cold war 2.0 to endhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULeDlxa3gyc
>>64202640The Finnish military industrial complex will rise. And soon Finland will be the new Sweden of the North.
>>64202640>No I don't want cold war 2.0 to endIt's still the first one. Putin is literally a Soviet holdout.
>>64202640>cold war 2.0this is more like a new world war. changs are determined to torch taiwan and if they succeed their appetite will only growmeanwhile vatniks in their seething hatred and contempt are determined to set east euro on fire no matter the cost. Finns are too tough and they cant defeat ukranians but definitely will be looking to attack the baltic states as the next theater. as they believe them to be completely defenseless and toothless. Which means they will walk into another three days special military disaster previously middle east was looking spicy with iran but after israel sodomized them on live TV they have been pretty quiet as they lick their wounded egos only things that can change these trajectories is if ukranians manage to ACK monke and the new tzar has his hands full digging his claws into his host. Ending this war bullshit is top priority when the only thing you think about is making as much money as possible. changs will be more hesitant to act in fear of losing face if there is nobody in europe causing trouble to distract
>>64202640> No I don't want cold war 2.0 to endYou forgot the most important part:> white commoner pays for those war spendings
>>64204202yes saar is of very harmful thing to be paying for national security
>>64204202You post in /k/ yet seem to hate guns and military equipment, how curious.
>>64204179Russia will never dare to attack nato directly, tardo.
>>64202640>AMVAnime music videos?
>>64204295https://tubedubber.com/?q=OleZ3m-mRwk:Gd9OhYroLN0:0:100:0:0:1
>>64204234I'm sure, majority of /k/ will play pacifists as soon as real mobilization begins in their countries. Guns are better as hobby or in video games.
>>64204335>as soon as real mobilization begins >>64202640>No I don't want cold war 2.0 to end>cold warWar tourists, >>>/out/
>>64204165>soon Finland will be the new Sweden of the NorthFilled to the top with niggers and Muslims? I sure hope not for their sake
>>64204291russia needs to fight nato before they collapse or their whole national identity will shatter. Loosing a war against Nato makes them the underdog and gives them something to cling to. Loosing a war to Ukraine, a country and people who are portrayed as a worse russia who werent supposed to be more then a stepping stone towards a new "soviet" era could lead to a complete shattering of their national spirit.Its like the US loosing a war against Canada
>>64204335<-My honest reaxn 2 ur poast
>>64204393>Filled to the top with niggers and Muslims?Sweden is about 70% white right now and has reversed its influx of darkies by kicking more out than they get lately.It's not good, but better than one would think from all the shitposts about it.
>>64204393>sandniggers without AKs coming to your countryor>rusniggers with AKs coming to your countryhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
>>64204506Both equally bad for long term success
>>64202640It's not a cold war when russia is pretty active destroying cities...
>>64204538Not every discussion is about Ukraine, buddehIt's pretty irrelevant for the board overall.
>>64204538Don't get ahead of yourself, it's a war between a Western proxy that is receiving pennies worth of aid and an already sickened Chinese proxy that is likely to collapse within the next 10 years. Hardly anywhere close to the political or military scale of a WW3 gone hot.
>>64204548Except that a certain country keeps threatening the three Baltic countries, Poland, Moldova. Threatening and degrading the voting. The're pretty active. And that is ignoring the muh nooks
>>64204506Why not recognise both are bad?
>>64204548Pretty relevant to the op post, since its the triggering event to the new rearmament programs
>>64204560>muh chainaChina keeps selling FPV so Ukraine is rely on them too. Meanwhile they aren't selling weapons.At least be less retarded like the norktard saying this russia is a proxy of North Korea.
>>64204562None of those countries matter lmaoWhere the fuck do you think you are?>>64204565Nah, let him enjoy the cold war and keep your schizo fantasies to yourself.>muh Russia will totally attack NATOsure thing faggot, go talk about it on /pol/
>>64204656>EU countries aren't relevantLmao even>Where the fuck do you think you are?Seething like that, kek.
>>64204665>>EU countries aren't relevantMost aren't.>he said a bad word so he's seething!Oh, hello newfriend.
>>64204656>let him enjoy the cold war and keep your schizo fantasies to yourself.So are you saying the cold war never ended or are you saying he should stop looking at the present?
>>64204670>Most aren't.>What's EDA, what's NATOAh, yeah, you don't want to talk about PUSSIA so you're saying "not relevant". kys retard. The European rearmament was started by russia, if you ignore that and the threatened countries then you just made your stupid thread void.
>>64204685>So are you saying the cold war never ended>>64202640>No I don't want cold war 2.0 to end> cold war 2.0????>>64204698>>What's EDA, what's NATOStopped reading here, see>>muh Russia will totally attack NATOAre you two retards bots?Post guns.
>>64204723Imagine kvetching like that.>russia will never attack Estonia because of NATOWake up, we aren't in 2024, it turns out that Germans understand that they can't rely on transatlantic help. >inb4 it should be like thatkeep digging
>>64204745>transatlanticNATO utterly outmatches Russia militarily even with transatlantic contributions limited to Canada.
>>64204745No guns posted, opinion discarded.See >>63603106 and go to >>>/pol/
>>64204757Impressive, but it's easy to talk when bombs aren't killing your people and destroying your cities. Maybe you think European countries have a lot of territory and population to lose while some ships have to move tanks, if they are sent, sometimes pEaCe is more important.is that hard to understand?
>>64204538If you had told a soviet leader that in the 21st century they would waste their entire military stockpile to conquer ~20% of Ukraine their head would explode.It's not exactly what people had on their bingo cards when they thought about the cold war going hot.>>64204548>stop caring about the war pls :(Get out.
>>64204775>He doesn't know the thread is about Politics because his education was subpar."Cold War was a period of global geopolitical rivalry between the United States (US) and the Soviet Union (USSR)"The very concept of CW is about politics.
>>64204723The belief the cold war ended in the 90s is the commonly accepted one. If it is true or not is another matter. The ussr shattered, russia is a broken mirror of what it was, yearning for the days that most of the republics gleefully left behind. Cold war 2.0, whether accurate or not, is an acknowledgment of that shattering.Russia says it wants the baltics, why would anyone not prepare for it?
>>64204785Care all you want, but talk about it on your containment board, tourist.>>64204792Anon, the thread is about an innocent man's joy of the success of the finnish arms industry. We have 9 lines about that, including a video, and one mentioning the cold war in a cheeky way.You're so poltard poisoned you literally think everybody is as obsessed with this shit as you are.>>64204794Great question, ChatGPT, go ask it on /pol/.
>>64204812European rearmament =/= cold warIs that hard to understand?it seems you need a dictionary to communicate effectively.
>>64204819Powerful autism on display here.
>>64204819Who do you think you're responding to?
>>64204812>doesnt care>replies to 3 postshmmm
>>64204895I don't care about the topic they try to inject here, I care that it's being injected on /k/ instead of staying on /pol/.You literally can't even allude to the conflict lightly without people like you sperging out about it.
>>64204889to Anonymous>>64204900The topic was injected by the OP
>>64204900Is rearmament not weapons related? Is the trigger for said rearmament also not weapons related?
Any news on ARVE?
>>64204907>The topic was injected by the OPNah.>>64204910>Is rearmament not weapons related?Sure.> Is the trigger for said rearmament also not weapons related?No. See >>63603106If you want to talk about politics, go to /pol/. If you want to actually talk about the weapons involved, you can do it here. How is that difficult for your to understand?Anon brought up several weapon systems. If you wanna talk about the war, talk about how they interact with the weapon systems of the enemy. Don't talk about the political background that has no bearing on those weapon systems.E.g. >the T34 was good design in 1941, hampered by Russian retardation>/k/ topics include the specifics of the tank, how it was used, which weaknesses it had and how those weaknesses came about>/pol/ topics include a debate about the moral turpitude of communism compared to your political system of choiceCan you bring up that communism is evil? Sure. Should you make a thread called "COMMUNISM IS EVIL" on /k/?No. Should you enter a thread about soviet Russia and keep posting about communism is evil instead of talking about guns and war?No.Should you enter any WWII thread that slightly touches on the soviets to spam about soviets being evil?No.Do you understand the difference now?This is a board for weapons and warfare. Not politics. Rules were loosened when the war started because talk about it wasn't really preventable with all the tourists coming here. Then it was confined to a general. Then the general was also removed and put back on /pol/ where belongs. The whole point of all of that was to return to the slightly more civilized and on-topic /k/ we knew and loved.Now it's still humming in the background, sure and I don't mind people bringing it up or mentioning it, but you have to realize that your kind is explicitly not welcome here and the sticky exists for a reason. It's because this is /k/ and not /pol/.I tried treating you like a human being, let's see if it helped.
>>64204210In an ideal pacifist utopia where everyone would see that wars are a negative-sum-game in the big picture we wouldn't need that and spend on R&D instead. Nuclear-electric propulsion spaceships to Jupiter moons or some other cool shit.But we don't live in this world, so yeah, defense spending it is.
>>64204964>Nah."No I don't want cold war 2.0 to end"Sure buddy.
>>64204991Yes, anon. Bringing up why it's happening in a cheeky way doesn't transform the topic entirely into the offtopic reason.Mentioning the MIC while discussing jet developments doesn't mean you should sperg out about lobbying in the thread.
>>64204961I was honestly very sure that Latvia was going to get it as their wheeled howitzer of choice (since there's already deep cooperation with Patria), but they went for the Archer instead.
>>64205019The problem with the ARVE is probably the integration of the 155 K 98 gun into it, since the gun has had technical issues in the past
>>64204402Do it, nook nook it.
Shhh... Shut it down!
>>64204335
