Is there any reason this wouldn't work?
>>64205536wouldn't fit
>>64205536Pistol blanks are unlikely to have enough power to fire a rifle grenade more than a dozen feet
>>64205536The PG-7 weights ~2 kg like that vs 1 kg of a normal pistolThat means the pistol's recoil velocity is the double of the muzzle velocity of the grenade, for a range of 10m that means being smaked by a pistol moving at 20 m/s (72 km/h, and in monkey units 45 mph, 79 yrd/s, 236 fps, 2834 inches per sec, 1074 miles per day ). TL;DR you'll lose that hand
>>64205558Solution - press the back of the handgun against the ground and use it like a mortar, similarly to how rifle grenades are sometimes fired.Yes, this will not do good things to the rear of the firearm and may in fact break it on the first firing attempt, but there is a solution to this - simply carry a bunch of disposable handgun mortars. Yes, throwing away a pistol every time you shoot an RPG will get expensive, but have you tried not being poor. As a bonus, you can pre-load the handguns with RPG warheads and quickly rapid fire them as fast as you can pull out handgun-mortars and press them against the ground.
what if sturmpistole but retarded
>>64205558>for a range of 10m that means being smaked by a pistol moving at 20 m/sWell, you have the right idea in general, but...A: it seems you just jump from 10m range to 10m/s for the grenade (which is then doubled for the gun) with no real reason or justification.B: recoil won't instantly accelerate the gun up to the maximum theoretical speed. The guy holding on to it will start de-accelerating it before it gets that far, meaning the gun will actually never hit that speed.
>>64205695Stock should probably be flipped but nice shoop
>>64205640A. The range for a parabolic trajectory with initial angle 45ยบ (simplification valid for low velocity), the optimal for max range, is Speed^2 / g.10^2 / 9.8 = 10.2 mYou can deduct that formula in less than 1 minute.>B: recoil won't instantly accelerate the gun up to the maximum theoretical speed.It'll do just that but the hand, then arm, shoulder and torso will decelerate it gradually. But not before damaging the fingers, wrist, etc.>>64205608That is better but a pistol shape without stock makes its complicated without adding some plate or something.
>>64205717>deductdeduce*
>>64205536I guess you could do it with a semi but it's much cooler with a revolver.The bigger question is, why are you unfamilar with the classics?
>>64205539It's OP, of course it'll fit. The real question is if he's not too loose.
