Which one of these not F-16 is better?
>>64297895long mig
>>64297911kek
>>64297895Better at what?
>>64297895the french dorito
MiG-29 has the twin engine advantage.Beyond that, not much
>>64297895Easy : any military gear coming from western countries (US, UK, France, Sweden and so on) will always be light years ahead of any steaming pile of shit coming from Russia/Soviet Union - in this case the MiG-29>same logic applies for chinkshit gear (or any brown/yellow country)
M2000, the best french fighter ever.>Even if the M53 was a Atar adapted as turbofan, and the Atar itself is based on the BMW 018, it's completely remodeled and using modern materials making it one of the most reliable engines of its time>a real radar>good range and maneuverability Meanwhile the MiG-29 >sick engines based on turboshaft designs that would smoke and have a mediocre durability during the first 20-25 years of existence>overweight and excessive emphasis on T/W limited its range to a mediocre local fighter like the MiG 21>the radar was only good on paper, unreliable and never performed as its specs making it a bad platform for radar homing missiles>absurdly advanced short range missiles/assistance that never could use
