>So OP americans cannot defeat it with 5.56>Americans needs to wait for fire support >MK12 is 5.56 so still can't hit shit at Name a deadlier weapon, this outperforms those gay ieds btw.
*pulls out my big scary penis that has hair all the way up the shaft* here's your deadly weapon, faggot!!
>>64314858An FN Mag/M240 would be the western equivalent. It isn't as lightweight, but it can sustain fire for an incredibly long time. Basically a BAR flipped upside down with an MG-42 belt feed. Lightened versions exist as well.
>>64315337Thats called an ultimax
>>64314858>Posts an MMG>Tries to brag about how it outshoots infantry rifles in intermediate calibersNo fucking shit, dumbass. The strength of the PKM in Afghanistan was the fact that it was light enough for hajjis to ruck up the side of a mountain and shoot down on troops in ambushes. And you don't need to be accurate if you have enough ammunition to fix & suppress your enemy, at least not if your objective is just to harass them.
>>64316580So you're saying the M7 is super necessary? Thus validating it? Which means the M7 has always been the answer?
>>64314858Fuck yamudda
>>64316902>intentionally positioning your troops downhill of the enemy is desirable and tailoring all your equipment to this specific scenario at the expense of viability in all other conditions is a good idea
>>64314858>30 MOA
>>64314858PKM is actually very good, as far as slavshit dakka goes.NSV was also decent but the new russian-made Kord is a disaster.
>>64316902You won't hit shit if you're downhill from an MG with an equivalent caliber to your infantry carbine, especially at these distances. They'd be fortified and you'd be out in the open no matter what.In the past, and without air support or armor (as you might find yourself in a hot near-peer war), you would have used a mortar, another maneuver element, or overwhelming numbers to defeat this sort of threat, none of which are compatible with the modern Western doctrine of high survivability, speed, and precision. You NEED Switchblade 300s and/or XM25-style counter-defilade programmable grenades for this. This is *true* overmatch, like how you leave enemy tanks to air support and only use your own tanks to kill infantry and destroy entrenchments. You shouldn't give your tanks comically huge and unreliable guns of questionable utility and 150 tons of armor to go up against enemy MBTs, because your tanks shouldn't be dealing with enemy tanks in the first place. This isn't the Cold War.
>>64315337I like the RPK-74M
bf2 sucks
