> force drones and cruise missiles to gain altitude so they can easily be spotted by radar and flakpic semirelneed it or keep it?
yeah
There isn't really a point to trying to make walls that high because the effort required to bypass it by drones and cruise missiles would be minimal whereas the effort required to build said wall would be pretty huge in comparison.
>>64324062I think even something as flimsy as chain-link could destroy or throw a cruise missile off course
>>64324082And all it takes is a couple of degrees and an extra X seconds or minutes of flight time to bypass all obstacles made large enough to be relevant. Most of the cruise missiles that you'd use in long range strikes also have enough just pure physical mass that basic netting or whatever on a refinery or whatever target we are talking about just won't cut it because the missile will just go through it and detonate. This is like the whole cope cages on T-72's against Javelins thing again. Sure the cope cages may do something against drones but more or less nothing against a big boy missile. You are more likely to achieve something with EW than netting or chains or similar.
>>64324094they can avoid the wall but when they climb over the high wall they enter the radar horizon and cant hide
picrel
>>64324348this is facts no cap unc
