/k/ - So in summation, gentlemen. What you have before y - Weapons

Anonymous

10/02/25(Thu)11:45:23 No.64342623

File: bradley.png (896 KB, 1384x593)

Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:45:23 No.64342623 Archived

So in summation, gentlemen. What you have before you, is
>a troop transport that can carry troops safely
>a reconnaissance vehicle that can easily defend itself if it encounters troops
>and a quasi-tank that has enough armor to tank two ATGM hits but has enough ammo to take out a mobik brigade
THIS is what we're building?

Anonymous
10/02/25(Thu)11:47:42 No.64342635

Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:47:42 No.64342635

>>64342623
Breaking news!
M2 Chadley and ChadVehicle-90 keep kicking ass!
REFORMERS ON SUICIDE WATCH!

Anonymous
10/02/25(Thu)11:53:43 No.64342657

Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:53:43 No.64342657

>>64342623
Careful now, you might summon Pierre Sprey!

Anonymous
10/02/25(Thu)11:54:40 No.64342663

Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:54:40 No.64342663

>>64342623
Thank you, chadley

Anonymous
10/02/25(Thu)11:55:26 No.64342666

Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:55:26 No.64342666

Wae thunder taught me the objects would be way better light tanks than the bmp (still no armour though)

Anonymous
10/02/25(Thu)11:55:57 No.64342673

Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:55:57 No.64342673

File: Bradleys having a differe(...).jpg (72 KB, 1024x576)

72 KB JPG

SECOND TO FUCKING NONE

Anonymous
10/02/25(Thu)11:58:07 No.64342681

Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)11:58:07 No.64342681

>>64342666
If your goal is solely anti-tank and the enemies have instant reaction times like in WT, then a good gun is better than an ATGM

Anonymous
10/02/25(Thu)12:10:53 No.64342737

Anonymous 10/02/25(Thu)12:10:53 No.64342737

>>64342623
>>64342635
this is kind of embarrassing.
what causes this mental illness?