Do we have countermeasures to ICBMs yet or once they start flying is everyone actually fucked in every corner of the world
>>64395478>we Retarded, baiting thirdies like yourself don't have any ABM. First world countries have THAAD and AEGIS which can both intercept a limited launch from a rogue state like North Korea or make warhead allocation more complicated for a larger nuclear power like China or Russia (for example being forced to allocate 3 warheads instead of 2 on all targets across the board in a MAD scenario)
>>64395478They have to actually work for them to be a threat. Things that are not a threat.>ICBMs that have never been tested succesfully because they keep blowing up at launch>ICBMs that have had their fuel replaced with water>ICBMs that have warheads a decade, if not more, without maintenanceThe DPRK has a larger, more reliable ICBM force than whatever face culture, paper tiger country you're shilling for.
>>64395478ICBMs arent a threat because we have so many fucking ways to shoot them down. Thing is, why risk it? If somehow one gets through, millions die. Russians though have nothing to stop ICBMs.
>>64396094>If somehow one gets through, millions die.And this is bad because...?
>>64396099Statimystically speaking you're going to be one of those millions.
