[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: FatCockM79.png (299 KB, 494x455)
299 KB
299 KB PNG
>supposed to be replaced by the M203 and M320
>kek. nuthin personal faggots
>>
>>64407042
There are probably still M72 LAWs kicking around somewhere in the US military too.
>>
>>64407689
there are
>>
>>64407689
Funny you say that, USMC boughgt brand new M72s less than a decade ago, promarily because of their lighter weight than the AT4.
>>
>>64407718
>>64407689
Whats even the point of the AT4, its overpowered for basic anti structure, anti vehicle tasks, and too heavy and big to be carried around to use any time but underpowered against actual armor and seriously hardened fortifications.
>>
Cigars aren't that great.
>>
>>64408067
I swear I've seen videos of AT4s being used to destroy IFVs in Ukraine.
>>
>>64408067
multiple types of warheads, but its obsolete at this point on account of new iterations
>>
>>64408067
>Whats even the point of the AT4
a straight forward replacement of the M72 in the squad AT role

> its overpowered for basic anti structure
thats a lie

> and too heavy and big to be carried around to use any time
you can carry one around just fine, and its still lighter than a full sized CG

>but underpowered against actual armor
more penetration is always better
even if it cant pen the frontal armor of a tank, the greater pen over the M72 still gives it a wider range of angles where the enemy side armor is vulnerable
and the greater post-pen effect makes the most of your single shot
>>
>>64408067
>too heavy and big to be carried around to use any time

Lol. You've never seen how much shit a PFC can carry lmao. You just sling it on your back or strap to your ruck. Yeah it's heavy, but fuck you
>>
>>64407042
Simpler is best
*this is a KNIFE*
>>
File: 1737325215833730.jpg (50 KB, 506x794)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>64408067
>too heavy and big to be carried around to use any time but underpowered against actual armor and seriously hardened fortifications.

We've seen a guy yell for more 50cal ammo in the heat of battle, who was handed an AT4, and he didn't complain.
>>
>>64408069
it's about looking cool, frodo, not enjoyment
>>
>>64411380
>very well, we shall fire the trebuchet!
>>
>>64407042
Eheheh, toob.
>>
>>64408067
in addition to more penetration and greater lethality AT4 has both better velocity and better accuracy than M72, which translate into more effective range.

anti-structure variants of the AT4 are still top of the line alongside CG rounds and are more advanced than the M72 ones.

besides that for reduced backblast variants the weight difference narrows down significantly so the primary difference becomes the size and cost.
>>
>>64408067
wrong
>>
File: Crenshaw Phantom Pain.jpg (171 KB, 675x900)
171 KB
171 KB JPG
>>64407042
>he initially got memed on as a real life Big Boss
>turns out he's just a neocon faggot
Man, Crenshaw was a disappointment.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.