HOLY SHIT
>>64411949>Newsweek>weird ass eggshell whiteBrown, yadda yadda
>>64411949
>>64411949russia is number 2?
>>64411958Second place is the US Navy
The millennium of BAHARAPATHAINDIA is here, suprootpowah
>>64411979Third place is the Air National Guard
>>64411949SAAAAAR WE SUPERPOOPER 2025
>>64411958They may not have info from countries like France because they would rather keep its capabilities secret. Unfortunately this will lead to a poor perception of their militaries and poor recruitment rates.
>>64411949>gookmoot will never grow a spine and rangeban you dalit cuntsWorst timeline
>>64411949This man cannot be serious with how the paks just beat Indias ass.
>>64411949As expected following new IQ ranking unveiled
>>64412114Air National Guard is part of the USAF.Putting it in it's own category is retarded.
>>64411949>we have aces and Stealth Planes saaar
>>64412291in the originale map dome by jeets Russia(their new master) has an iq of 105.irl they have 76.
>>64412291>poland 67those jeets lol
>>64412158>poor recruitment rates.the only thing that influences recruitment rates are size of salaries
>>64412291Imagine being down in those 55's, you could get up each morning it'd be all shiny and new>Then you'd forget how to start a fire and probably drink motor oil or something
>>64411949KEK, it's real. The author isn't even Indian but likely Iranian.https://www.newsweek.com/india-overtakes-china-in-world-air-force-ranking-10882624They released this even after the Paks humbled superpower 2025 India with Chinkshit?
>>64412291>>64412305Russia and China tend to score high on IQ tests because these studies are often conducted in urban areas. In Russia, only a few major cities are typically included, and in China, the government may influence which data gets published. This can lead to inflated scores that don’t fully represent the national average.There’s another metric called the Intellectual Competitiveness Index (ICI), which evaluates how effectively a country converts its cognitive potential into education, innovation, and economic output. While Russia and China have high IQ scores, their ICI ratings are more modest.Think of IQ as the horsepower of an engine, and ICI as the quality of the engine’s design, maintenance, and transmission. High horsepower doesn’t guarantee performance if the rest of the system isn’t optimized.https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-iq-by-country
The author just cites WDMMA, which seems like a global firepower -tier clownshow, take a look for yourself.https://www.wdmma.org/ranking.php
>>64412291What the fuck is the colour and shade for on this map?
>>64411949Impoosive
>>64412364>which seems like a global firepower -tier clownshowIt literally is.>Part of a network of sites that includes GlobalFirepower.com, MilitaryFactory.com, WDMMW.org, and Warpower:US
>>64412350>Russia and China tend to score high on IQ tests because...They've both got a long and well established culture of systematic lying to save face, and lying to make themselves look better than they really are.
>>64412408It is also because in the West the tests are done in rural areas, not just urban, lowering the average. If this was also done in Russia and China they would be at the bottom of the list.
>>64411949Good morning saar.
>>64412426>Occupation: Jeet Beater>Job Satisfaction: Off the charts
>>64411949I'm so sick of reading crap posted by retards from the third world and BRICS on this fucking site about how they are not irrelevent braggart failed civilisations buyt le mighty m ilitary parade power. Its got beyond tedious. The main thing the Chinese and Indian states share is a history of military inepitude and a pattern of ridiculous adulation of dictators in Moscow that appeal to their inability to have any morality.
>>64412291>Argentina>8.3.1
>>64412291I personally always believe statistsics compiled by the chinese communist party especially the ones about record harvests while they had famines or how super clever they are. Really makes you think about the scrutiny provided by multi party contested elections, freedom of expression, critical press and how they produce more valaid data and better weapons systems. Chinks and poos are what they are, a reminder of how civilisation exists only in the northern hemisphere and the threat to mankinds future the global south gibbering idiot plague represents.
>>64412426That's theIindian way, inane cruel and tiring. The European way is just throw a couple of hand grenade in and power wash it out and turn it into a productive railway ticket office. The Chinese way is to starve them until them memorise gibberish written by Chairman mao.
>>64411957>>64411958>>64412134>>64412303>>64412335Who's number 2,3,4 then?
>>64412291>Poland 67I can confirm that, nobody here knows how to tie shoelaces, we all use duct tape instead
>>64412557>In 1973 Mao initiated a new 5 year plan, the "Three trees - five peoples policy" (Chinese: 三棵树五族政策; Pinyin: Sān kē shù wǔ zú zhèngcè) which sought to standardize the environmental landscape of the entire nation so that each of the five major ethnic groups of China could feel a common sense of identity and appreciation of nature. The trees were selected for their history, aesthetics and the personal tastes of the Chinese leadership. The three trees chosen were:>1: The China Fir (Chinese:杉木, Pinyin: Shānmù)2: The Plum Blossom (Chinese: 李子树, Pinyin: Lǐzǐ shù)3: The Dawn Redwood tree (Chinese: 水杉, Pinyin: Shuǐshān)>These three trees together were called the "peoples trees" (Chinese:人的树, Pinyin: Rén de shù). A fourth tree was proposed by Wuhan party secretary Kang Di-Lung, the Katsura Tree. Initially party leadership was in agreeance with it however the tree of Japanese origin was considered a symbol of Japanese and capitalist imperialism by Mao. Di-Lung was imprisoned and subjected to public criticism by members of the Red Guard. He was then sentenced to 3 years of hard labor planting trees in the deserts of inner Monglia for anti-Chinese arborism.>The government rapidly began to employ peoples work brigades to uproot and burn old growth forests of other types of trees for replacement by the three "people's trees". By 1973 nineteen thousand acres of old growth forest in China had been burned or felled to make way for the new forests of the peoples trees. >Student unions and the Red Guard were tasked with finding and burning depictions of other trees. Literature such as "Marxist-Leninist approach to forestry" and "Mao's fifteen essays on socialist arborist thought" became mandated reading in all educational centers in China. Books that extolled the values of trees other than the "people's trees" were destroyed. Especially hated were Bonsai, seen as icons of Imperial Japan.
>>64412630United States Navy, United States Marine Corps, United States Army.
>>64412688>The newly cleared areas were named "people's forests" in December of 1973. People's Liberation Army work brigades begin the arduous process of replanting these woodlands with the new "people's trees". Problems begin to arise by summer of 1974. Due to mass burning of forests, ecosystems begin to see rapid changes. Small scale desertification begin in areas that had previously been lush and green. Seeds from the people's trees were often not native to the regions they were being planted in and failed to take, yet they absorbed much of the nutrient resources before failing. The government begin to direct increasingly great amounts of water and fertilizer to the "people's forests" yet few thrived. Soon farming communities on the periphery of the peoples forests begin to see desertification. Crop yields begin to dwindle dramatically. Farmers requesting water and fertilizer be directed towards them were termed class traitors and punished by the Red Guard. >Soon outright famine begin to spread from towns adjacent to the forests to entire counties as mass desertification took hold. Mao Zedong claimed that crops and land had been poisoned by foreign powers or that deep set layers of poison had been laid under crop lands by the Japanese Imperial army. Because of this, many became afraid to eat food grown in areas that the Japanese had formerly occupied, even in areas where crops were not being affected to desertification. The United States and Soviet Union both offered food aid, yet the Chinese government turned it down stating that there was no problem.
>>64412718Wait, let me guess. The chinks put all this time and effort into these forests to the point of causing famines and desertification. I bet the next step is a massive blight due to the monoculture, yes?
>>64412557>especially the ones about record harvests while they had faminesThat actually isn't as outlandish as it sounds, the Soviets had better harvests compared to the Russian Empire (but due to modernizing their farming methods, not collectivization).Their famines were generally more due to their absolute dogshit logistics and organization, not failed harvests.
>>64412796> Their famines were generally more due to their absolute dogshit logistics and organizationDon’t forget the farmers lying about their harvests and the government taking their percentage of the inflated number.
>>64411949>third most powerful Airforce in the worldI'm pretty sure the third most powerful Airforce in the world is the United States Marine Corps.
>>64412520When people say the nazis are retarded they really weren't kidding
>>64412291>highest IQs>still live in raw sewageRight.
>>64412947You wouldn't understand.
>>64411979Navy is third, USMC is second.
>>64412992No it's not.
>>64412291I never would have guessed the real life Wakanda is actually Bolivia.
>>64412688>the "Three trees - five peoples policy"I know different countries/cultures have different conventions. I know that translations often sound clunky or awkward to non-native speakers. I'm sure we've do similar things ourselves. But that doesn't change the fact that I find everything about China and Chinese history irritating and tedious and one of the worst parts is the use of numbers in slogans and terminology (the "Four Olds", the "Hundred Flowers Campaign"). It's twice as bad when they use pairs of numbers (the "Two Bombs, One Satellite" programs). It's ten times worse when the nouns are synonymous ("the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors"). As far as I'm concerned, Chinese culture sucks three dicks and seven cocks>P.S. every Chinese historical figure has like twelve different names over the course of their life (and death). Birth names, milk names, student names, courtesy names, art names, revolutionary names, era names, regnal names, temple names, posthumous names, to saying nothing of epithets, nicknames, nom de guerres, and descriptive titles. Fuck you, I'm not going to waste my time learning any of those and I'm making a jerkoff motion whenever I come across names like "Supremely Mysterious and Primordial Emperor".
>>64412978>Sea Lebensraum and aura projecting
>>64413110George Bush Sr. tried to do a "Thousand Points of Light" campaign, and I'm 99% sure it died because of the dumbass name.
>>64412433>Job Satisfaction: Off the chartsWith the amount of beatings he has to do I think he would get fed up very quickly.
>>64412688>the "Three trees - five peoples policy">>64412718Did you just post your fanfic? I have no doubt the Chinese would do something this retarded but I can't find a single source to back this up.
>>64413110>"Supremely Mysterious and Primordial Emperor"It got worse.
>>64412416>admitting that liberals are smarter than conservativesWhy would you do this?
>>64413271Amateur shit. >Idi Amin's official title while in office as President of Uganda was 'His Excellency, President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Idi Amin Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas and Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular'. He also claimed to be the uncrowned King of Scotland.
>>64412350>There’s another metric called the Intellectual Competitiveness Index (ICI), which evaluates how effectively a country converts its cognitive potential into education, innovation, and economic output. While Russia and China have high IQ scores, their ICI ratings are more modest.Russia is indeed modest (Rank 36, Score 54.31), but China is still extremely high (Rank 2 and Score 77.86), according to the 2024 Intellectual Capital Ranking: https://solability.com/the-global-sustainable-competitiveness-index/intellectual-capital
>>64412433Yeah but think of all the poo you’d fling everywhere. Is that worth it?
>>64413331Yeah no fucking shit. Open up any random research paper from a respected journal like Nature, and you will see a long list of chink names. The idea that the chinese don't have a high IQ is pure cope.
>>64413159And you owe China accuracy then? Because they are unfailingly obliging to your views?
>>64413356*Asian Americans
>>64413312>Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in GeneralI kneel.
>>64412291Bolivia are secretly running the world
>>64413374The fuck kinda ESL is this shit?
>>64412364All these power rankings is basically Yugioh tcg but for militaria. Great for chuuni 13 year olds but not something adults should take seriously.
