[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1746154226087300.jpg (75 KB, 784x906)
75 KB
75 KB JPG
>A Chinese J-8II fighter being loaded onto an American C-5 transport on January 1989.
>The fighter was sent to the US for upgrades, which included the AN/APG-66 radar.
>>
>pictured man buys condom for bull preparing to fuck his wife
Very inspiring, world solidarity everyone!
>>
Implessive
>>
>>64412666
Why are americans always fantasizing about being cucked?
>>
Didn't they cancel this upgrade project due to the Tiananmen Square incident?
>>
>>64414180
In part, but cost was a reason, a modern engine alone was more expensive than the original aircraft (already obsolete) and after the Gulf they prioritized 4th gen programs.
>The US did offer multiple options of engines to China but the only thing they would be able to localize (a requirement) was a modernized J52 and they didn't want yet another turbojet.
>>
Wait till you learn about Lockeheed teaching the Chinese to fly there cargo planes
>>
Funnily enough this wasn't the last time that a Chinese aircraft got inside an American.
>>
>>64414512
while we're on that subject. Imagine being a Chinese kid working in a sweatshop that makes Dildos and vibrators. Knowing your handywork is gonna go inside an American woman
>>
>>64412635
Why exactly?
>>
>>64412841
Americans?
>>
>>64414200
??????
>>
>>64415133
nta, it's probably upgrades for an ally like Pakistan or smth
>>
>>64415133
>Peace Pearl

>The 1986 "Peace Pearl" program with the United States included upgrading 50-55 J-8 IIs with US avionics, Martin-Baker ejection seats, and possible US engines for US$502 million. Two aircraft were flown to the US for prototyping, and work was underway by the time of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre.[18] Peace Pearl was cancelled by China in 1990; the US had permitted it to continue despite the post-Tiananmen Western arms embargo.[19] Afterwards, China bought the Sukhoi Su-27 from the Soviet Union in 1991; the first were delivered in 1992.[20]
>>
>>64416811
The Mutts love building up their enemies, they did it for the USSR, China and with the way they're propping up India we'll have a Jeet problem in the future
>>
>>64416821
jeet problem is impossible they're simply too incompetent even when given functional equipment they can't use it
>>
>>64417148
we thought the same thing about the Chinks tbf
>>
>>64417651
The difference that the China is a high-IQ collectivist face culture while the India is a low-IQ collectivist at the family level and individualist at the societal level face culture. The Chinks were able to succeed to an extent because they can make passable copies and work towards a societal vision. Jeets on the other hand have created a society where the most stinky brownoids think that they are royalty and that hard work is below them, anything that isn't personally enriching them or their family is worthless, and scamming is righteous. They are both bad, with shitty bug behavior, but the bug behaviors that would be considered lowly and for the weak in China are the things that the jeets regard as aristocratic.
>>
>>64416811
I believe that one of these J-8s was used in the Have Phoenix program. All I know is that at least two types were used as part of this program sometime in the late 1980s or after.
>>
>>64418456
>China
>high IQ
Pick one.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.