Was the SCAR series of rifles overrated?
>>64415632Properly rated but overpriced. If they ran at $2k instead of $3+ im sure theyd sell enough to be a nice niche like bullpups
>>64415632Unproperly rated and overpriced.
>>64415632Maybe underrated. Scars seem to be decent rifles in spite of the price and scar owners are generally happy with them, but there has been a constant weirdly personal hate campaign for the last 15 years.
>>64415632>Will never have a FN F2000fugg
>>64415715https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1132598666
>>64415729What did I just say
>>64415734Make some money by selling your ass
>>64415736Shalom
Could've been great if they bothered to iterate on it.
>>64415736You offering $3250 for an ass blast?
>>64415749too rich for my blood, but maybe he could start an onlyfans
>>64415746>if they bothered to iterate on it.Thats the point of this. They've made a new SCAR for the British army contract bid, and whether its successful in that trial or not, that will be the infantry rifle in their product line from now on.
>>64415632it would have been a good gun if they hadn't tried to sell a rifle made of extruded aluminum and injection molded polymer for four thousand dollars. the barrels were nice on them, sure, but they should have been $2k rifles at most.
