militaries with a gorilla warfare origin or mindset, are they effective? yugoslavia, current china, albania, they have a history of gorilla warfare and kinda originate from that gorilla warfare.how deep does that gorilla go in their military thinking? it's one tihng to have a plan if one gets occupied but doesnt eveyr militray do that? is state mandated gorilla strategy a good idea given how not so often gorillas free their countries in history?
Look at Cuba. Batista was one of the most brutal, oppressive dictators in modern history who allowed the people of his country to die of basic needs not being met. GUERILLA warfare requires a replacement of all government functions by the rebel factions. Schools, hospitals, access to clean drinking water. Basic needs that can be organized and met are a thousand times more effective in creating an army than money. As long as the Guerillas can provide a legitimate countergovernment, then people will join and support them.
>>64436854But Im talkin about gorilla warfare. OP pic related.
bu,p
>>64436841Bangladesh and Vietnam have a history of Gorilla warfare and I'd say they've got the best ground troops pound for pound in their regions
>>64436841Guerrila warfare could easily bring down the usgovernment if done properly.A small group could cripple every major metro area by firing cables over electricity pylons and using hunting rifles to perforate the oil-reservoirs low down on major electrical transformers, the ones that take 2yrs to replace and there are no spares for, that use oil for cooling the internal copper coils that otherwise melt and are irreparable.Bringing the usa to its knees in a week would be easy for any armed group of no more that 50 capable men on the move with a half-decent plan.
>>64437688You're gonna go to jail now, having demonstrated you know that
>>64437688Low iq take. Reading this post has made me lose a little more faith in humanity. The fact that you are this stupid is both appalling but also very embarrassing.
>>64437710Your usa is amusing.You exist only to amuse me, usa.
>>64437688>50>a weekUSA is far too big for 50 to be enough, and has too much institutional momentum a week to be long enough. however, several groups of ~50 in multiple locations could inflict significant damage, and if targeting the proper pain points, induce severe economic hardships, and severe political changes. i don't believe you could induce a collapse that easily, but the disruption would likely cause other governments around the world to face similar problems due to the sheer quantity of food exported from the US normally. you could induce a collapse of staple foods in russia, india, most of south america, and parts of africa with the right dedicated campaign.
>>64437710If your usa is so weak and fragile that it be brought down with a simple cheap plan that can be described in a couple of lines, it deserves to fall.You live on a knife-edge already.Why be surprised when you fall on your own blade?
>>64437786How many saudis with $1 box cutters were needed to twat the laughable usa into a new dark age in 2001?
>>64437688>things FBI agents say to their grooming victimsIt's amazing your ilk are still using this line in 2025. Cops and gamer dads would stop this terrorism before it started, if any would-be terrorist retard was able to slip their FBI leash that is.
>>64437836>Cops and gamer dads would stop this terrorism before it started,50 men, 50 states.Your peasants would still be trying to figure out why the lights went out three weeks after the war was over, buddy.Even simple storms take out entire states with ease in your backward usa.>the usa is built on the principle of 'JUST-ENOUGH-AND-NO-MORE' and without reserve capacity for anything it is always teetering on collapsePushing the usa out of balance is laughably easy.You're not living in a well run country, bud.
>>64437810>to twatah, you are very wect i see>how manyactually quite a few, even if only a handful had to die to complete it. bin laden coordinated and ran a very sophisticated operation against a larger adversary and exploited some very vulnerable attack surfaces, previously unconsidered. however, this attack primarily served to empower and centralize the already existing government, allowing it to direct military power at will under the guise of safety. there were no follow up attacks committed by the same group, and bin laden's primary indicator of success and objective was to solidify his position as the foremost leader of a possible islamic caliphate, something that was fairly successful up until around 2008 when his own faction began looking elsewhere due to a lack of progress on that goal.
>>64437888You talk like a glowing nigger.I like you. You're funny.Are you a dirty jew?
>>64437852Take a coffee break, Timmy. This board deserves better agents.
>>64437895and you're trying desperately to ignore the smell wafting in from outside. seeing as you're not actually interested in how to fight and win an insurgency and instead just jerking off about how it totally could be done by you and your cousins, i already know what your wall outlets look like. pick up a couple of books, actual, real books, in english, crack them open on the subject, and examine the subject much more deeply. or go back to your containment.
>>64437916>you're not actually interested in how to fight and win an insurgencyI'm not.You're right.Because this isn't a description of an 'insurgency'. You are way behind the curve, grandpa.The successful 9/11 attack on the usa was successful because of the damage the usa then did to itself subsequent to the single attack.Such an attack on the electrical infrasctructure of the usa would likely have a similar successgul outcome as the usa hurts itself after the event.It's NOT an insurgency... and that's why you fails every time. You cannot imagine simply inflicting hurt so you amputate some part of yourself in self-revenge.That's the beauty of dealing with the usa. You have an enormous capacity for self-harm.It's rather pretty.
>>64437786>you could induce a collapse of staple foods in russia, india, most of south america, and parts of africa with the right dedicated campaign.but why
bump
bump2
>>64437688Its not worth it.All that would be accomplished is a lot of innocent people would die.
