If you want extreme coversion, extreme stealth, extreme secrecy, look no further than the delisle.Suited for only the quietest operators, wearing only the blackest clothing and the most muffled shoes, the Delisle is the perfect weapon for comitting massacres in crowded public venues without anyone noticing before it's too late.You could walk into a mall with this thing and start shooting people in the head and killing them and no one would even care because everyone's too busy looking at their smartphones talking about having sex and sucking cocks or whatever.The ultimate stealthmaster carbine, for those who want to turn crowded public venues into bloodbaths but very quietly and discreetly.
how would you know? you've never even seen one irl. you've probably never even fired a suppressed gun.
>>64442763Because the delisle was designed by qualified mechanical engineers with consultation from professional ninjas, the people who built that thing know how to make a weapon quiet, unlike any modern trash, where you can still hear the weapon cycling if it somehow manages to resuce the decibel level of the supersonic round breaking the sound barrier.Older engineers were better than new engineers, now that people have to rely on the internet for everything, they've lost their natural engineering intuition, and that has removed the ability to create silent firearms.
It's so quiet, the report has been described as "like a moist shart, filtered through two pairs of filthy sweatpants."
>advertising a thing you don't sell, or own, or even played around with yourselfdork.
>>64442778>unlike any modern trashQ fix, for one. same dead silent profile but with an even more devastating effect on target due to the twist rate. it's just fucking expensive is all. also the round drops like a rock at distance.
>>64442756OP has mental health issues
>>64443021This is true. The fast twist rate increases the rotational velocidensity by a quantum shift factor of 2.4.
Fag OP watched something on Jewtoob/Instagfag and now has a new personality.
>>64443026Sounds more like some jeet bot to me.
>>64442778>professional ninjashow many ninjas were there in 1940's Britain?
Being annoying on /k/ won't change the fact that he molested you in your asshole, OP.
why do de lisle threads trigger /k/ so much?Personally I think it's cuz glowniggers hate the idea of civilians having access to an ultra quiet firearm that's quieter than airsoft
>>64443846It's Fuddlore: The Gun. There are many, many firearms on the market much quieter and with much better performance than a rattletrap .45 ACP bolt gun fitted with a trash can suppressor designed 80 fucking years ago, but smoothbrains who have never touched a suppressed firearm in their lives continue to repeat a bullshit 85 dB figure originating from an article printed in the 80s quoting an unspecified report from the 40s like it's the unshakable gospel truth.
>>64443930yeah I'm not reading your seething reply
>>64442756I thought 45 apc was a suppressor's disappointment
>>64443930Yeah someone posted that article once and it stated an unsuppressed Sten was 120 decibels or something like that. The measuring equipment they used back then was trash.
>>64443271Plenty, secret MI6 agents who were trained to be like ninjas, so they might as well be ninjas.
>welrod but biggerI mean yeah, who wouldn't want one
>>64442756>>64442778The measuring standards and equipment they had back then were abysmal. I've heard a reproduction DeLisle with an original baffle stack and one with a modern baffle stack. Not only is the modern stack quite a bit quieter, but any 9mm with a locked breech is SIGNIFICANTLY quieter still.You're a moron and a noguns/nocans/noshoots and so is anyone else who thinks the DeLisle is some whisper quiet thing. It's literally louder than a fucking autoloading pistol because they didn't know dick about baffles back then.inb4 some true dickless brainlet brings up 80 decibels (LOL)
>>64442778What you are claiming is just plain silly. Engineers who are now designing suppressors are better trained than their equivalent in 1940's, we now have better understanding of theory what is needed to make good suppressor, have better materials and much better tools being able to run simulations of designs on computers before even making a first prototype. In addition design capabilities are not limited to what was available (had to be based on Lee-Enfield rifle) and are not under pressure of war to stay with-in strict time-limit for development project.Let me guess. You used De Lisle in a computer game and that got you here simping for the design? De Lisle carbine is a classic and apparently was good design for its time, but for the same size and weight modern engineering could do better and there now are suppressors that are at least equally effective for .45 ACP, but also more durable, smaller & lighter.
Thanks but no, I'm sticking to suppressed Mosin.
>>64443846I hate this gay pseudo-authority know nothing retard>>64443965>>64443930>durr, this ruler is old so it’s garbage>when they invented the decibel they weren’t able to measure it because my cellphone didn’t exist What were the test conditions, you dumb fucks? Sound intensity from a point source (pretty much a gun barrel) decreases as the square of the distance from that source. Putting the microphone just an inch or so further away will give you completely different results. Measuring the sound difference between different guns using a standardized test procedure in lab conditions is something nobody does so results can really only be usable comparatively, i.e. comparing one gun immediately after another in the same setup and not comparing numerical results from two different assholes on different days in different locations. But even then nobody seems to give a shit for controlling variables like placement of the decibel meter so you get ignorant people just placing a decibel meter on a table and blasting away from different positions with the loud bit of the gun different distances away from the meter and thinking their numerical results have any meaning.
>>64442756Wait, where do you put the bayonet?
>>64443953>what is physics?That’s retarded. Using a suppressor is like the main reason to use 45acp now. Like if you like pic related rifle because it’s some magic fucking stealth sniper rifle then you don’t know how physics works. It’s a subsonic bullet that weighs 278 grains, 45acp travels the same speed with a 230 grain bullet because we are loading these things to be right below the speed of sound. That makes 45acp 82% as powerful as 9x39, but 9x39 is only 25% as powerful as 5.56 shot from a carbine length M4. People don’t understand how much powerful bullets depend on speed to be powerful. They’ll shoot subsonic 50bmg and expect it to do 50bmg things, but they’re retarded because subsonic 50bmg has the same muzzle energy as black powder 45-70 shot from a Trapdoor Springfield.>>64443930>this was designed a long time ago so there is no way it works because scientists back then were complete retards and just lied about how good it was
>>64443930You are a malding faggot, and you just proved that anon correct with your confidently incorrect, shit-eating attitude
>>64444608>People don’t understand how much powerful bullets depend on speed to be powerfulWould you be able to compensate for the loss in speed with something (retarded) like a subsonic 30mm round?
>>64444628
>>64443930>>64443965Article link or at least printed edition name?
>>64444643Just plugged the numbers into an online muzzle energy calculator>50mm projectile weight (assuming solid shot): 24694 grains>Subsonic velocity: 1000 fps>Muzzle Energy: 54827 ft-lbsFor comparison the upper reaches of .50 BMG muzzle energy is about 15000 ft-lbsClearly modern special forces need specially built, integrally suppressed, subsonic 50mm rifles.
>>64444769
>>64444775
>>64442778>an still hear the weapon cycling>this is somehow relavent to a BOLT ACTION delisle
>>64442778its literally a bubba tier conversionworks well but nothing impressive engineering wise
>>64442778i dont know what kind of rocket science you think went into the de lisle but its just a chopped up lee enfield with a big suppressor
>>64444644http://www.valkyriearms.com/images/delisle.pdf
>>64443846>not dressed up as No.62 Commando>le serious stare into the cameraNo style. No soul. No humility. Utterly unacceptable.
>>64444574>But even then nobody seems to give a shit for controlling variables like placement of the decibel meterMIL-STD 1474 has been the standard for measuring firearm sound levels for a long time. It has very precise requirements for sound pressure sensors and other equipment and how they are located. It's what anyone with a shred of professionalism follows.
