[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: MLRS_M270_HIMARS.jpg (118 KB, 1200x630)
118 KB
118 KB JPG
For close in support as and infantryman how does It change beetwen gunships(helis, ac130), A-10 or other jet, Rocket artillery, loitering munitiins, droned like predator, tube artillery, tanks and IFV?
>>
>>64450329
O and also mortars
>>
Good morning saars, that was almost a proper sentence
>>
whatever is available
>>
>>64450329
Gunships and predators (or should I say, bayraktars) only against foes with no AA.
The rest as available.
>>
>>64450329
>>64450338
Motars are company sized support weapons. Everything else is dependent on the threat environment. Gunships and line of sight CAS is dead against anything other than goatfuckers, that leaves the missiles from standoff or wild weasel stand in ranges. PrSM won't be used on it's own but be joined by a package of JASSM and MALD.
>>
>>64450329
Significantly and fundamentally, but no one is going to collect or write your emerging doctrine analysis for you, you titanic third world glowfag.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.