>Make ABM system that can intercept a handful of warheads at best>US assigns 70 nukes just to knock it outImagine being in a bunker nearby as 70 nukes go offIs this the most cost effective and genius approach to terminal interception outside of stuff that never made it off the drawing board or past testing
can you clarify your question? the thread subject and what you're asking seem to be at odds with one another.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVUtvrCfnJ8
>>64461652The answer is yes, at the time./thread
>>64461652Nah you just get Ukraine to hit it the day before the strike problem solved.
>>64461652I want to visit there
>>64461652Did it blow up or something?
>>64461652very hard targets can be defended with systems like mozyrterminal interception is ineffective by definition, you can't defend spaced apart soft targets that wayspace based systems can do it in midcourse but they are also somewhat easily countered by using independent third stages in missiles
>>64461652If the situation ever gets to that point, you got bigger things to worry about. Like an actual TEOTWAWKI situation.
