[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_1877.jpg (189 KB, 746x1000)
189 KB
189 KB JPG
>>
>>64462574
It would be sort of easy.
>>
>Surrender and we will raze Quebec to the ground
>>
>>64462574
When plans were being made it was more even, now US would stomp with only issues being brutal city warfare in ottowa and issues in Quebec . Most of the country would just join the US due to political differences with cities
>>
>>64462574
>Realistically, How Easily Could America’s Military take Canada?
Depends on the politics, unironically. If you take some idealized scenario where America was essentially unified (say like 70-90% popular support behind a president of similar margin) in the need to conquer Canada, and thus willing to tolerate significant cost over a long time period, and Canadians were demoralized because a lot of them thought the US had a point (only way to get that much of the Americans behind it, say somehow a nazi regime came to power over the leafs and launched attacks on the US or some crazy shit)? Then America would of course gigglestomp them. Leaf military is ultra weak since they've always had an invincible adamant shield in the USA and wanted to spend on other stuff instead. They have a huge land border and all their pop and industry concentrated near it. It'd be over practically before it began. No foreign support would be incoming either, US owns both ponds for now. Canada has zero chance in that regard.

But more realistically, to the extent any of this involves any realism, is some highly unpopular American admin going full retard. There is basically zero appetite amongst the US public for such a stupid endeavor, and outright hate towards the idea from a plurality if not majority. And definitely a majority of states actually at the Canadian border. Which means not merely political opposition but endless sabotage and cheerful help in directing weapons over the border into leaf hands etc. Leaf morale and patriotism is a real wildcard and their shitty lib governments have worked hard to disarm them but they certainly have the sort of territory needed for stupid levels of guerilla warfare and insurgency. They wouldn't need to win outright just hold out until the US left which is quite doable.
>>
>>64462636
Though to be clear it's not just these two there are endless variations. A non-retarded US admin might well be able to use enough smart long term planning and geopolitics to get a lot of Canadian support with good use of casus belli and carrots/sticks and thus only need to fight to a limited degree. This is all deep into unknown unknown black swan shit. But doing what we've been doing just promotes patriotism that was rotting away before. Nothing unites people like a shitty bully common enemy. Things like OMG U DID MEAN REAGAN AD I TARIFF U isn't winning hearts & minds lol.
>>
>>64462574
despite most Canadian's beliefs to the contrary, 90% of their population lives within 100 miles of the United States border. They are also generally unarmed.
the other 10% are some bad ass motherfuckers likely responsible for the length of the Geneva checklist. They are absolutely likely to get involved in such a conflict, even if only because it will be something to do. The major question is which side they will be on. Sure they're Canadian, but if the U.S. wins then they get even more of the freedom and liberty they already enjoy by being out in places where whiny cucks don't go. Also, they would get the 2nd amendment. Independent outdoors types love the 2nd amendment.

in answer to OP's question. it'd be exceedingly easy.
>>
>>64462574
Most of Canada is empty, what isn't empty is a piss stream distance from the US, and full of cowardly gay retards who hate themselves almost as much as they hate the US. Everyone not a cuck would take weeks on foot to even arrive. IF THEY WANTED TO.

The real wild card are the immigrants who won't like being redeemed by an occupying force with looser ROE. They might resist in the name of gibs.
>>
File: 1520607390976.jpg (113 KB, 780x520)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
>>64462589
>fpbp

The dumb fucks got all their shit one one spot, all along the boarder. It would be the easiest invasion ever. Too bad it didn't work out for the early day for the untrained colonial militia. But. They fucked up.
>>
>>64462574
Lols imagine if they both have a secret plan to invade, do it at the same time and just wind up trading places.
>>
Not going to happen as two organized states. Most realistically, it would be Canada getting dragged in to an ongoing US 2nd civil war.
>>
>>64462574
A couple days of strategic bombing could permanently annihilate their ability to act as a state, ruin the economy, the military ect. That's easy. Actually policing that huge area would be harder, but not as hard as occupying a country accustomed to violence.
The question is what are you after, because occupations can just kind of go on forever without feasible goals.
>>
There is a higher chance of new Civil war than US attacking Canada. Kinda pointless to even think about it. Its like how easily can Germany annex Czech and the answer is same as WW2 couple of hundred delusional people dying. The military assembly around near the boarder would be enough.
>>
>>64462574
idk i think we could fuck shit up if needed but there's little chance any government would commit to killing nearly 40 million native Canadian hindus
>>
>>64462589
A 3 day special military operation, if you will
>>
>>64462779
if there's a civil war i want all canadians to know they must seal the border asap
nothing personnel but if were chimping out remember that half of us see you as americans in denial which means you're also a valid target when we're killing americans
>>
File: the_day_of.jpg (344 KB, 1300x956)
344 KB
344 KB JPG
>>64462574
the can*dian menace is yet to find a counter to this 3000 year old technology
pray that they do not, for it is all that keeps their imperialist dreams from reality
>>
remember how cringe it was to see all those self-hating canadians in cangen being like 'pls annex us america!'
>>
>>64462887
yeah almost as cringe as the fags thinking amerifats wouldn't sign up to blow up canucks for cash money if the political class decided that was something they ought to do
>>
>>64462574
Considering the fact that the vast majority of Canadians live within 100 miles of the US border I'd say it would be pretty easy. America has no problem invading a place and beating the shit out of the enemy military. It's the actual holding of that territory that they don't do well and that's more to do with our engagement rules being too soft on "insurgents".
>>
with or without Chinese helps?
>>
>>64462574
Largest resistance would come from the Chinese soldiers posted here. The caf can't deploy more then 300 infantry and their already in Latvia. The jeet hoards will flee immediately.
>>
>>64462901
Canadians are far to cowardly do form any insurgency theyll just cry on reddit.
>leaf infantry vet.
>>
>>64463004
I know this retarded autistic leaf with a colonostomy bag who got so buckbrocken by Trump joking about invading he bought an SKS to "fight the yanks" because Trump is a strongman dictator and its just like when Putin began amassing to invade Ukraine.

I do believe he will have it confiscated soon, because lmao Canada.
>>
god i hate canadians
>>
>>64462574
we have 6 arrows pointing to them, they only have 3 pointing at us so usa wins
>>
>>64462574
>US invades Canada in general northward push
>Millions of Indians leave and their economy tanks in a week as every major business screeches to a halt
>Quebecois like all Frenchmen surrender and flee to France
>Turned away because they aren’t Muslims kek
>Rural Canadians welcome their liberators with open arms
>Ottawa bombed for like a day
>Ottawa surrenders
>Ottawa bombed for like 1000 more days just fucking because
>Crown Royal factory burned to the ground
>Laughs in Tkachuk
>>
The population thing has already been brought up but also our entire country is serviced East to West basically by a single road. Taking out the trans Canada highway would wreck the country. A protracted war would result in similar guerilla tactics used in previous US conflicts but Canada is in an interesting state currently with a fairly large portion of the population being absolutely sick of the Canadian federal government and their mismanagement.
>>
>>64462574
Canada would have to really go out of their way to piss off the US enough to cause a land invasion. Our hat has been good to us and we aim to be good to them, even if we bicker. If Canada suddenly issued a public declaration of war against the US we'd probably sit on our asses doing nothing and wait for Canada's next move trying to find context. It's just not something either side would consider without a huge change in world dynamics.

War Plan Red only exists because the US drafted plans for war against a huge number of nations, even one considering civil war back in the 1930s. War plan Red was like 10 pages long if that. War Plan Black (Germany) and Orange (Japan) were 100X longer and infinitely more detailed. Canada had their own plans to invade the US, which was called Defense Scheme 1, which mostly just involved blowing up roads and bridges in the hope of throwing the US off balance long enough for reinforcements from Britain to show up. It was later scrapped as impractical.

I read all this in Uncle John's Bathroom Reader. I didn't even have to look it up. Take that GPT fucks.
>>
>>64462592
Quebec is the only "real" Canada and it always has been
>>
>>64463192
For me, it's Labrador
>>
>>64462574
The vast majority of Canadians who actually own and train with firearms would not support the Carney regime that's trying to steal their property and would be quite happy with annexation as long as they got US citizenships. So, pretty fucking easily because there'd be no guerrilla resistance or anything.

(Obviously I'm ignoring the actual invasion process because Canada's military is a joke. This is not a serious country, in general.)
>>
>>64462574
We should have found out in 1917.
>>
File: Canadas Superweapon.jpg (436 KB, 2000x1333)
436 KB
436 KB JPG
>>64462574
How do you propose to deal with pic related?
>>
>>64463292
Pray to the Wawa shrine
>>
>>64463065
finally a real general
>>
>>64463292
Legalize pate.
>>
>>64463292
not a significant concern
we have been ignoring them for years successfully. all they've done is shit in some ponds and bite a mulatto or hundred
>>
>>64462592
Nah, that's only gonna make them angrier. If anyone gets to raze Quebec to the ground, it's damn well gonna be the rest of Canada and nobody else!
>>
>>64463292
honestly, i'd just leave, there's no winning here, the australians have tried and failed to curb the perfidious avian-saxon to their eternal shame and i have no desire to join in with them
>>
>>64462636
>the sort of territory needed for stupid levels of guerilla warfare and insurgency
No. There is a reason why such a large percentage of Canadians live on their southern border. It's simply too inhospitable for too much of the year, which has a bunch of knock-on effects as well because it also means there is little reason for enemy forces to be in remote and sparsely populated areas while at the same time when they do have a reason to be there it becomes very noticeable when things start happening out of the ordinary. A Canadian insurgency would be an urban/suburban insurgency which are very different.
>>
>>64463065
Yes, but their three arrows are at least twice the size of our six arrows. Gentlemen, I have come to an worrisome conclusion, against the Canadian menace we are faced with an arrow size gap that if not corrected immediately will put us on a permanent backfoot in all future map colorblock based warfare.
>>
>>64463292
All Geese are inherently American and would side with the US against the proxy-French.
>>
>>64462574
The IJN can be heard furiously masterbating across the Pacific (maybe the Anglo Jap alliance returns and they get a free hand in China) as the British Empire fights the US for some reason
>>
>>64463391
The worst case scenario is that they form an alliance with the Emus and start the Poultry Liberation Army.
>>
>>64463341
I think you mean foie gras, mon ami
>>
>>64462574
They'd get bogged down in the maple syrup swamps, assaulted by Canada gooses, then probably eaten by the packs of rabid meese. The weed is also fierce, so a few hundred gorrillion casualties to chronic.

Overall, pretty fugg'n ugly. They should stay home and guard Fortress Orange from the ANTIFAs.
>>
>>64463103
Important to note that 'not a fan of the current admin' doesn't always translate to 'wants someone else to forcibly replace their government and make them a puppet.
Russia made that mistake going into Ukraine, they thought that low popularity would translate less rally-round-the-flag effect.
>>
>>64462574
Realistically?
Because of our military position it would almost all be politics with some light border skirmishes.
Realistically - mil fight?
It'd be Iraq 1991 pt.2

>>64462592
The best possible outcome. Blonde mountain french women for everyone.
>>
>>64463292
Just kill humans, don't disturb their nesting sites, and pray whatever god you believe in that they won't be taking an issue with you. If they do, a quick bullet to the head will spare you the torment
>>
>>64463292
I was traumatized by those fuckers as a child and learned how to handle them in my early 20's, you just have to show dominance, yoink them around by the neck or bitch slap them hard. they will piss off
>>
>>64463391
>the perfidious avian-saxon
All cry fowl and let loose the swans of war!
>>
>>64462574
>military
Rapid defeat of leaf military and surrender of leaf government.
>economically
Santioned by the planet, all former allies side with China.
>>
File: Oregoncountry.png (1.25 MB, 1000x1019)
1.25 MB
1.25 MB PNG
>>64463192
The only parts of Canada that aren't "real" Canada are those that rightfully belong to Greater Oregon, the same as how all of America is "real America" apart from what is rightfully Greater Oregon clay.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.