>Semi auto reproduction
>>64481616Better than not being able to get anything.Also depends on what it is. Not a huge loss to not have the full auto function on a battle rifle for instance.
>>64481626>Better than not being able to get anything.No, it's not. It's shitty cope, and buying it only wastes money you could instead be saving to buy the real deal. And that's assuming that it works, which is a big assumption to make. An awful lot of the time these legal-workaround repros are about as reliable as a 1970's Citroen.
Unless it's a belt-fed I really don't care.
>>64481616Form>Functionyou poors wouldn't get it
>>64481639It's a little different if you are talking about an open bolt SMG or LMG converted to closed bolt as opposed to something like an AK/AR/FAL. A semi auto AK is fine.A closed bolt BREN for instance is pretty dumb but that's why they aren't very common. Most people recognize that and not many people are willing to buy one. They exist purely for the tiny handful of people who would put up with every issue that a closed bolt semi auto version would entail, in addition to the exorbitant cost because that's just what they want. It doesn't have to make sense.
>>64481616>"reproduction">look inside>its worse in every way, even the materials used, while being way more expensive
>>64481652If you really had money you would be able to buy a real machine gun my guy
>>64481759akcshually full-auto isn't that useful and my repro is just as good and I do have machine guns but they're on loan and you're just jealous because poor
>>64481616>Full auto abortion
>>64481778That's like owning a Bugatti Veyron that's limited to 120mph because you're never actually going to go at 250mph
>"reproduction">look inside>it's not about sex
>>64481616thats my fg42
