What's the current state of russian military technology.Will it ever be on par with the US military?
>>64527126>lust provoking image>irrevalent time wasting question Bad thread go away
>>64527141>>lust provoking imageWhat are you gay?
>>64527145What do you think?
>>64527126they have got an monopoly and edge in militarized orthodox femboys
>>64527126>What's the current state of russian military technology.Poor.>Will it ever be on par with the US military?It will never be on par with the Soviet military.
>>64527145That's a girl wearing her brother's uniform
>>64527126How do we prevent Russian twinks from getting raped or dying.
>>64527179>>64527126where does one find orthodox femboys?
Being raped
>>64527212lol
>>64527263He was right about Russian equipment being designed for suicide missions.
>>64527199You can't.
>>64527212>russian tech is either meant to last a 100yrsNot really. Zigtech is designed with plentiful zegro slave labour in mind to be available to do the ergonomically cursed maintenance such crude shit needs. That doesn't work these days thanks to russian women winning the Abortion Olympics every year since the wall fell.
>What's the current state of russian military technology.Bad. There's no money, no skills pipeline, a critical shortage of key technologies (that are simply lost to decay and sanctions) and the whole sector is held together by the kinds of financial chicanery that even Hjalmar Schacht would find silly.There are some areas it has a global maintained advantage but it's in niche areas like submarine hull construction and brute-forcing influence operations where there has simply not been the investment by competitors because it doesn't feature in conventional doctrine. >Will it ever be on par with the US military?Here is how you REALLY make /k/ chimp out: The advantage the US has over its adversaries is its alliance network which provides access to cutting edge technology that is not possible on the national level without compromising quality and cost. Neither Russia nor China can compete in a fair contest here because they just don't have access to international supply chains in the same way. >>64527179>Ramzan Kadyrov is my HusbandoI'm bored of the internet sex industry now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5CmL-R_D4U
>>64527126good enough to trigger the comsec mods
>>64527199NATO intervention and the creation of the muscovy nature park/twink paddock.
>>64527199Prevent?
>>64527179Truly, a bez analogov capability of Rodina
>>64528789Zesty asf pidor
>>64527126
>>64529309He's EMERCOM I think. Shoigu's old branch
>>64527179>Kadyrov is my husbandoLmao
>>64529336where is shoigu anyway? been too long since he had a story arc
>>64527126Hello. Probably never.
>>64527126why is russia the enemy again?
>>64527126Sex
>>64528789>>64529336getting >before and after armyvibes from this zesty zizzy
>>64527126RAIDEN! TURN OFF THE GAME CONSOLE
>>64529996Thry seem rather insistent on it I'm afraid
>>64530062hot
>>64527206The usual places you find russians, moscow, petrograd, london
>>64527179>Ramzan Kadyrov is my Husbando Holy shit, abysmal taste even for a vatnik
>>64535112
>the only unpaid shills of russoids are literal faggots and tranniesLOL
>>64529996
>>64529421>skirt/hose/tall bootsname a better combination, i dare you
>>64527126They've been entirely reliant on inheritance from the Soviet Union, so it's declining rapidly.Their budget is stretched too thin to keep up, much less develop new tech. Doubly so now that they're an aggressive nation again. They need to maintain a massive conventional military now, and their competitors do not. They need to maintain an offensive nuclear deterrent, which is incredibly expensive. Also, now that Europe does mutual defense, their historical role as an intervening superseding power between warring European nations is gone, meaning their negotiating power to acquire technology via exchange or joint programs, which is how it's done these days, is diminished.They could become technologically on par with the US military under two conditions.1. The US declines and withdraws from power politics. Unlikely because the US government exists entirely to facilitate large companies, many of whom are in the defense sector. But this wouldn't be "on par" in a desirable way for Russia, which I assume is the spirit of the question.2.Military technology flattens so much that the meaningful tech is achievable for low end powers. This is also unlikely in the near future. The closest you get is a pop-theory that low-end drones and hypersonic missiles are wonder weapons that will make all existing military technology obsolete. But this is a novelty gap rather than a real example. Modern arms races for new tech tend to increase tech gaps.There was a third option for them to gracefully decline from their elevated imperial/soviet status, and essentially piggyback off the progression of a major military power such as the US or China. But Russian leadership peremptorily ended that option by trying to do 18th-19th century foreign policy in the 21st century. NATO will no longer try to transition Russia into a potential partner, and China will not abide a loose-cannon military partner that could subvert their own foreign policy options.TLDRBadNo
>>64535144checks out
>>64529996>why is russia the enemy again?Last time I checked it's actually friend for India
>>64535932>They've been entirely reliant on inheritance from the Soviet Union, so it's declining rapidly.I remember asking in threads back in 2023, when everyone was obsessed with tbak storage numbers, about how many dumb aerial bombs the Russians had in storage. Anons just told me to not think about it, as the stockpiles were so large that there was no way the Russians would run out. Time is a bitch.
