[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


What exactly do officers do that justifies them getting such higher standards of living than the regular troops? Surely a mechanic or rifleman is more important than some paper pusher.
>>
>>64553173
>What exactly do officers do that justifies them getting such higher standards of living than the regular troops?
They think for the mechanic/rifleman/OP who is too dumb to think for himself.
>>
File: 1760508287806524.png (96 KB, 518x142)
96 KB
96 KB PNG
>>64553173
>Image

Anyway, preferential officer treatment is a holdover from the days of landed lords/knights leading armies of peasants. Plus officers tend to be more highly educated so you want to give them incentives to stay in the military instead of fucking off to civilian life.
>>
>>64553173
This is the only time I would wish to be a natzee

Also, better to have your half-important guys look good instead of like every other shabby jarhead
>>
>>64553173
>paper pusher
idiot
>>
>>64553198
FPBP
>Coomer
kek
>>
>>64553173
I fuckin hate hornyposters I'm just trying to read about cool guns and planes and tanks and shit and now you've got me fantasizing about what it'd be like to be ~13 again and get molested by attractive older women. fuck you.
>>
>>64553173
Tard wrangling is a valuable skill
>>
File: rpk1.png (1.25 MB, 1000x1339)
1.25 MB
1.25 MB PNG
>>64553223
Nobody forced you to get horny. It was by your will that you started thinking about getting molested.
>>
>>64553198
holy fucking based
>>
File: Not persuaded.png (3.8 MB, 2784x2811)
3.8 MB
3.8 MB PNG
>>64553242
Total groomer death
>>
File: antontalk.png (313 KB, 839x573)
313 KB
313 KB PNG
>>64553262
A woman can't groom a man, they can only forcibly love them via manipulation and whatnot
>>
File: 1762710840251.jpg (77 KB, 773x1007)
77 KB
77 KB JPG
>>64553265
The implication of the text here is that the victim isn't a man but instead an autistic teenager
>>
>>64553198
>/OP
Lol got em
>>
Enlisted are retard and fast replace, NCO a little less but not by much. While officers even junior officer are that win wars.
>>
>>64553173
shotafags are subhuman
>>
>>64553214
>image
That really happened, but the tank crew were all male pidors still raping the young boys. This is not considered gay in Russia.
>>
>>64553173
>why does the manager make more money than me?? I do all the work around here!!!
>>
File: kys.gif (999 KB, 500x265)
999 KB
999 KB GIF
>>64553269
FUCK man I don't even know how to save this, but still it's not as bad as the other way around

>>64553291
>S*yBooru
Kill yourself faggot
>>
>>64553173
>some paper pusher
answered your own question there, they need to make administrative and potentially dangerous decisions that involve very expensive things, mens safety, or both combined. Better treatment comes from them needing a clearer mind to make better judgement calls while in high stress scenarios. Granted, good officers in the field will share the same conditions and even try to elevate troopers conditions to their own officer standards to keep troop morale up. Discipline combined with good morale led by competent leaders creates an effective fighting force. >>64553198 put it more succinctly
>>
File: A lesson for M200.jpg (3.6 MB, 4664x7688)
3.6 MB
3.6 MB JPG
>>64553307
>the other way around
You mean the daughteru bullshit?
>>
File: rpkdream.png (206 KB, 509x510)
206 KB
206 KB PNG
>>64553336
I don't know. All I'm saying is that if a woman was forcing herself on me I would be like a guy listening to the police, not resisting.
>>
File: 1759541298590743.gif (783 KB, 400x400)
783 KB
783 KB GIF
that warehouse lady ruined Radovan
>>
File: karadzicwater.webm (559 KB, 1476x1080)
559 KB
559 KB WEBM
I ain't proud of it but I ain't ashamed of it
>>
>>64553347
>not resisting
Yes you did according to your own story about the warehouse woman
>>
>>64553369
>>64553360
wait what's the warehouse lore? I haven't been keeping up.
>>
>>64553428
he got groped by a hot Latina in a warehouse
>>
>>64553173
are you stupid?
>>
>>64553173
want to know what happened to spanish republican militias that had no officers? They died.
>>
>>64553173
Tard wrangle junior enlisted an SD dumber than them
>>
>>64553453
and he didn't hit it? And when you say "hot," hot for a virgin or objectively attractive? Stolen Valor Serb, Prithee respond with haste.
>>
>>64553198
am i retarded or what the hell rank is one chevron and an asterisk?
>>
>>64553627
That is a foreign soldier.
>>
File: Sgt_Sides.jpg (86 KB, 809x1024)
86 KB
86 KB JPG
>>64553627
>what the hell rank is one chevron and an asterisk?
CWP: Corporal Without Portfolio.
>>
>>64553173
Officers are the ones ultimately held accountable for the units goals and conduct. NCOs are basically a combination of enforcer and teacher. The difference between the two is that NCOs are specialists in the tasks of their unit type, and officers are specialists in command tasks specifically. To put it in civilian terms, officers are general managers and regional managers, and NCOs are supervisors and shift leads. Ask yourself if you would eat at a restaurant that did not have a manager and was instead run completely by minimum wage teenagers.
>>
>>64553627
>what the hell rank is one chevron and an asterisk?
Private in the Japanese Ground Self Defense Force
>>
>>64553173
Flatties would be better tankes cause they take up less space
>>
>>64553844
Yeah but cushioning is important when you're being thrown around in a metal box.
>>
>>64553173
Jesus christ those faces are hideous
>>
>>64553269
why do slavs love warhammer so much
>>
>>64553173
you also need to keep in consideration what the enlisted or the officers are likely to make if they stayed or turned civilian.
most enlisted have high school as their highest education level. officers have a bachelors or masters degree.
if you don't offer commensurate pay to what an officer candidate could earn as a civilian then he's not going to enlist.
>>
>>64553866
The artist in question had quite the trajectory, started off drawing polandball style humor comics but with tanks. Now most of his work is fantasy (elves elementals etc.) ladies with gigantic tiddies.
This is the first time Ive seen him mix the tiddies and the tanks.
>>
>>64553882
They hit their mental ceiling at 12 years old.
>>
>>64553173
Turns out it's the officers who decided who gets better standards of living.

It's an old holdover from when all officers were nobility or gentry simply because they were the only ones that knew how to read a map. Education was expensive so the people who were educated enough to be officers had the money and status to demand better quarters. As time went on, the divide between officers and enlisted became cultural and by now the tradition is so deep that we honestly don't know how to run an army otherwise.
>>
>>64553173
They don't have to justify it : if you don't give good conditions, you'll have a hard time finding good candidates.
Apparently, there ain't much problem to find enough grunts at the currently offered conditions while there seems to be a problem finding enough officers once you pay them less and force them to live like grunts.

This guy gets it : >>64553214
>>
>>64553623
>and he didn't hit it?
no. he's retarded
>And when you say "hot," hot for a virgin or objectively attractive?
he said 8/10
>>
>>64553831
Oh so he wasn't actually closing his eyes, that's just how they are
>>
>>64553882
plz understand slavlands are culturally 10 to 20 years behind thanks to gommunism. This will explain a lot of behavior that might otherwise confuse you.

.t slav
>>
>>64553214
This. Even after we switched to flintlocks most of the officers had to be Gentry at the very least and many nations would let you buy an officer's rank for money.
>>
>>64553277
/ss/ is ultrabased.
>>
>>64553173
Write reports
You might be surprised how near-illiterate the average soldier can be, even in this day and age
It poses manning issues due to the increasingly advanced equipment even grunts need to operate

That being said, these days I believe officers should be promoted from the ranks after doing at least 1 year as private. In today's world it's no longer a waste of service time, and affords valuable ground-up experience and perspective. Of course officer commissions ought to be extended a year to compensate.
>>
File: 1710798690227214.png (6 KB, 228x221)
6 KB
6 KB PNG
>>64553223
>>
File: 1758426631844131.jpg (11 KB, 236x250)
11 KB
11 KB JPG
>>64554429
>You might be surprised how near-illiterate the average soldier can be, even in this day and age
Conscription solves these kind of problems.
Recruit the average citizens from every strata of society, not just bottom-of-the-barrel losers who don't have any better options in life.
>>
>>64554453
Conscription also gives a bunch of other problems like a complete lack of motivation and taking valuable workers away from production. It's really only useful when the nation is at risk.
>>
>>64553173
They take full responsibility of the risk. If the mission goes wrong it's their fault
>>
>>64554453
>Recruit the average citizens from every strata of society, not just bottom-of-the-barrel losers who don't have any better options in life
Losing your middle class professionals and intelligentsia will utterly fuck your nation up even if you eventually win the war
Look at Flodden, Agincourt, WW1
>>
>>64554453
>bottom-of-the-barrel losers who don't have any better options in life
Have historically been the enlisted professional lifers who built empires, anon
You think people were NCOs or the ancient equivalent because they liked the army? They joined and were lifers and got gud at their jobs because the army was the most rewarding career they could realistically get
>>
>>64553882
because for them it's "literally me" meme
>>
File: Wario kek.gif (2.5 MB, 518x347)
2.5 MB
2.5 MB GIF
>>64553173
Talk about /ss/
>>
>>64554272
That's just sad
>>
>>64553173
Managers manage all the things you complain about and take blame put upon their career for your mistakes.
Nobody would do a thing like that getting paid and treated the same.
If you don't like it aim higher or find another career choice.
>>
>>64553223
Have you considered not thinking about your weird fetishes?
>>
File: Yukari smug.png (1.17 MB, 1920x1080)
1.17 MB
1.17 MB PNG
>>64553223
>now you've got me fantasizing about what it'd be like to be ~13 again and get molested by attractive older women.
You got something to tell us anon?
>>
>>64553173
>tfw you weren't born in a weird hentai reality where every adult woman seems to have an uncontrollable desire for shota cock
God I wish I was molested
>>
>>64553262
So what exactly is wrong with grooming? Everyone uses it as an insult these days, but nobody can explain exactly why it's bad.
>>
>>64554857
Retards misuse the term a lot but to be serious here: grooming is wrong because it's someone else's kid being manipulated and molded by another adult, it's very prevalent with professionals in environments that handle children, arguably a very precious resource.
Grooming can happen to adults too but it's not as bad because adults can make choices unless they're low iq or genuinely retarded/sheltered
>>
>>64554857
>nobody can explain exactly why it's bad
you've never had children and to this day lack self-awareness of your teenage years, and it shows

Early teens have the minds of children even if they may have near-adult bodies and develop crushes easily. this is partly hormonal; the flood of growth hormones needed to grow sexually mature organs has a side-effect of making you want to fuck. it's an extremely dangerous time for adolescents who can be easily impressed by that "cool" adult basement dweller NEET who seems to know the answers to everything.

Prepubescents usually don't even know what sex is. (I myself learned the mechanics early but didn't really think about it in a relationship sense until later. To my single-digit-age brain, it was a strange mechanical process. I literally didn't think about it at all for the next 4 years.) At that age, paedos usually tell kids it's "just a game". Monkey see monkey do, and children at that age are barely more than monkeys.
>>
>>64554908
So it's a case of "bad when you do it, good when we do it"?

>>64554936
You wrote a lot but said very little. What's your point?
>>
>>64554969
No.
Children are not equal to adults.
Children are subservient to their parents, and ultimately their father.
Every parent has every right to raise their kids according to their values.
>But what about abuse
Of course lines are drawn when it comes to genuine acts of abuse.
>>
>>64554857
>what exactly is wrong
Fuck around and find out

>>64554969
The inherent wrongness of grooming a child / teenager into a physical relationship is obvious to anyone who isn't a cho mo or predator
>>
>>64554857
It's bad because it's manipulation and usually when manipulation is necessary to reach ends, it means the ends are very hard to justify. Underhanded tactics and deception are necessary to reach the ends.

How grooming differs from just manipulation is that the victims are children who look to adults for guidance. Children don't know any better, and you're at such advantage you can convince them of anything.

But in the context of child like adults, its the same thing. We just don't call it that because there's an assumption that adult people are capable of handling the world. As it turns out you don't need to be a retard to get groomed as an adult.

Assume you have a kid who's teacher is grooming them to fuck them. Now or later in life. That's a very obvious example of grooming. But it does happen in other formats and contexts, such as ideological. And it does happen to adults, we just call it manipulating, gas lighting, etc. Some famous examples of adult grooming is 4chan/X spammers grooming adults over time into doing things and more importantly thinking the way they want, which later influences their life. For example /pol/ trying to make everyone on 4chan a nazi. Another example is this discord group which tried to convince gays and traps become trans, and get sex change ops. And a final example is government funded groups(ie. israel) trying to force depression and anxiety on white extremist groups on 4chan by spamming stuff like BBC porn.
>>
File: Helem cackle kek.png (55 KB, 277x317)
55 KB
55 KB PNG
>>64555002
>/pol/ trying to make everyone on 4chan a nazi.
Didn't need /pol/ for that one kek
>>
>>64555018
>>64555002
>As it turns out you don't need to be a retard to get groomed as an adult.
>>
>>64554969
>What's your point?
attempting to fuck or date kids or even teens is illegal because they are too stupid to tell the difference between playing Pokemon or sucking dick
>>
>>64554990
100% agreed. Which is the point exactly, "grooming" is fine and accepted when it's the parents or the government doing it. Yet somehow still "grooming" is bad? Make it make sense.

>>64555002
Right, that's the exact point I'm making. Good job picking up on it. "Grooming" is absolutely accepted, but only when the anointed groups do it. When children are taught to salute the starred flag (whether it be the one with 50 of them or the one with a single six-pronged star), it's seen as something completely normal.

>>64555101
You're the only one talking about making children suck dick. I'm talking about grooming.
>>
>>64553173
>great bodies but comical big eyes
artist ruins his own art
>>
>>64555134
This retard doesn't get it, he's the same type that thinks 16 year olds should vote
>>
>>64555134
>ackshually I meant something else when I used that term
literally go fuck yourself
>>
>>64555145
Are you intentionally missing the point or just retarded?
>>
File: file.png (126 KB, 1167x809)
126 KB
126 KB PNG
>>64555158
Do you not know that words have definitions?
>>
File: 400 guns in my trunk.png (70 KB, 630x524)
70 KB
70 KB PNG
>>64555166
Words definitions also change over time, and with context. And "grooming" in the context of what was purportedly said doesn't mean that definition and has more connotations of sexual grooming.
But you knew this and you're being a pedantic cunt because you're a narcissistic midwit and these kind of semantic games bullshit are how you try to convince yourself you're smarter than other people.
>>
>>64555438
Nah I just want to fuck kids.
>>
>>64553198
OP obliterated in one post
>>
File: Shorsey.jpg (58 KB, 1200x627)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
>>64553198
Top notch post.
>>
>>64553173
In most militaries, the majority of grunts are snotty nosed 18-25 year olds. Do you really want to let them be in charge of anything? Officers have to go through a longer course and require at least a diploma/degree in most countries, to eliminate illiterate dumbfucks.
>>
>>64555587
give your balls a tug

so gay
>>
>>64553901
He should learn how to make faces that don't look revolting.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.