Because european armies don't need to routinely shoot at some random sandniggers half the world away.

>>64618713
>eurodrone
KEK

>>64618726
They don't into force projection.

File: EU regulation.jpg (52 KB, 960x720)

52 KB JPG

drones are too unsafe for euro standards

>>64618785
Can't be too safe with German cabbages!

File: mq-9 reaper2.jpg (3.72 MB, 5400x3039)

3.72 MB JPG

That drone class is for striking the enemies of Democracy from a number of timezones away. These are great if you hate arab weddings and are as bloodthirsty as Obama was. Maybe Merkel saw how much FUN obama was having playing with his toys and wanted to relive her childhood again.

Also, I totally see Merkle with a secret sadistic side fighting the urge to drone while holding to weird RoA that only make sense to her.

File: 1760535255072682.png (670 KB, 716x1036)

670 KB PNG

>>64618808
too sad, they’ve already lost 30 of those drones in Yemen this year alone

>>64618821
+100 Izzat

>>64618785
>pic
>complex things are complex, simple things are simple, think-gooder things be think-gooder
Wow, amazing.

>>64618868
Euro cannot even into greentext properly

>>64618785
>>64618794
>>64618868
https://fullfact.org/online/cabbage-myth/

File: file.png (607 KB, 1280x720)

607 KB PNG

>>64618713
I blame Germany

>start of the program
>decades ago
>US started using reaper to kill target
>Germany be like "noooooo! it must never carry any weapon! you can't kill people by pressing buttons if you aren't near the weapon or something"
>Europe try to reason them out
>years later
>finally accept to have weapon on it
>Germany treat it like a makework program, quality doesn't matter as long as it give german works to do
>decades later
>still no drone
>meanwhile Dassault had 6 countries make the Neuron in 6 month
>and a random company make AAROK in 2 years
>France want out of the project

And then they wonder why Dassault don't want the Bundestag having majority votes on the SCAF.
I bet the AAROK will enter military service before the Eurodrone

thinking about it, it is funny how we were debating the ethics of heavy combat remotely controlled drones barely different from manned aircrafts, then 20 years later everyone is wondering why we don't have our own swarm of hand-sized AI-powered killing robots

>>64618952
>very elaborate disinformation
Not buying it.

File: bayraktar F_2diKyXwAA53uC.jpg (864 KB, 4096x2731)

864 KB JPG

İtalya is going to have these.

>>64618726
>Because european armies don't need to routinely shoot at some random sandniggers half the world away.
Anon...

File: file.png (124 KB, 320x604)

124 KB PNG

>>64618821
oh no
how will the US ever recover

>>64618899 (wasted)

>>64619075
is it confirmed?

>>64619367
When was the last time European armies had to blow up some random wedding 6000 km from their borders?

>>64618713
It’s a GWOT era weapon while Europe is preparing for a conventional war. Bayraktars had a good run in Ukraine for about three months until the Russians realized to deploy some AA. Large Russian drones were dead in the water even earlier than that. Drones like that are a fun concept but not meta right now.

>>64618726
This, the sandniggers are right here and can be shot with rifles

>>64618726
>half the world away.
hmmm

>>64618981
This will not please the wehraboos

>>64618785
it's whose and better
the main relevant text Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 is about 34k words but applies to all vegetables and fruit
if you divide that by the amount of produce explicitly mentioned you get less than150 words per.
but there's also the fairness and competition directive, organic labelling, deforestation free labelling ect.
if you the same words/produce mentioned in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
you'd probably get to about a thousand words

having had to work with both the EU and UK regulatory framework for various farm related stuff. frankly the EU does it a lot better.

>>64622413
Feels like all you need to do is make them cheaper then the AA used to shoot them down. Just a big fat, cardboard target.

>>64618713
Euro countries are too busy being occupied with magic "Russian" drones instead.

>>64622491
Retard. You need a weapon to do it's task.

File: Screenshot_20251211_15004(...).jpg (674 KB, 2340x1080)

674 KB JPG

>>64622491
>make them cheaper then the AA used to shoot them down
That's kinda where the meta settled but then ukies just crowd-funded cheaper AA.

>>64622402
>Sandmonkeys
>Europe
>6000 km away
Anon...

>>64618713
Why twin engine? its a drone ffs

>>64622714
>Why twin engine? its a drone ffs
Why do drones not enjoy the optimisation of trading weight for power or just doing your best on a budget?
There's always constraints or design goals you're not aware of.
Maybe smaller engines were just cheaper or better at the time?
Or they're made by the right company in the right country.

File: gJFMx3qAci3y6SiO2e83I3Rb7(...).jpg (1.13 MB, 3360x2240)

1.13 MB JPG

>I am forgotten (Kızılelma stole the spotlight)

>>64618726
bombing the shit out of Libyan human traffickers is something Europe needs to do, they just aren't bothering

>>64618785
holy lel you schmucks slurp down propaganda like it told you it loves you back.

File: really nigga.jpg (162 KB, 900x590)

162 KB JPG

>>64618821
>obsolete drones from 15 years ago are utilized as expendable assets
>expendable assets are expended
>THE AMERICAN EMPIRE HAS FALLEN, RAGHEADS CAN SHOOT DOWN SLOW MOVING PROP-DRIVEN DRONES WHICH LOITER OVER THIER POSITIONS FOR HOURS

>>64623914
They're not though, everything is duplicated, Twice as much maintenance the one engine equivalent would be PW100 its ridiculously common size. Plus all the supporting components (fuel system etc.).
So its this >Or they're made by the right company in the right country.

>>64622714
German safety autism.
Yes really

>>64624048
>$35 million drone
>expendable

>>64625656
1. 15 years old
2. Stop being poor