Vietnam was the most kino conflict ever
sending young european men to die for literally nothing, yes very kino
Nah, it was the cornerstone of american pussyfooting which broken their mind for generations to come. Never allowed the army do actually win the war. Sat in the jungle for no reason. Lost.
>>64650318Not really. It did have the best music tho.
>>64650720>vietnam>european men???
>>64650720>young european menFrom Spain?
>>64650777Chegum trips
Woah
>>64650318>Vietnam was the most kino conflict everYou wouldn't know, you weren't there, man.
>>64650911>France>Not EuropeanAmereimutt education, everyone.
>>64650777>lostCheck out our k/d ratios. Did we "lose"? Yes. Did we lose? Fuck no. We killed millions of those slanty-eyed, communist bastards. Plus, Saigon has McDonald's (not that that is any measure of victory).
>>64650318agree
>>64650777coping cuck, you sent nearly a million troops to Vietnam and still hot-tailed it as soon as the Vietcong and NVA gave it to you. There's no strategy by which you can 'win' the war, all you're describing is how a losing army throws a tantrum and takes it out on civilians after being BTFO on the ground, which America and the so-called "democratic world" has a tendency to do.
Punches USA's face inPunches China's face inPunches Cambodia's face inAll back to back in quick succession. How did they do it?
How do ruzzian shills always manage to reply so fast? Do they spam F5 for new threads?
>>64652195You forgot the French.
>>64652186That's fine thou? Vietnamese are kafir and idol worshippers. If America was White and Islamic it would actually win wars because they wouldn't concern themselves with kafir stuff, my Anglo ancestors massacred demon worshiping indians for Allah
>>64652763That's not impressive. Everyone's beaten the French
>>64651924Yes, the USA LOST the Vietnam War. k/d ratios don't mean jack shit if you still lose the war, just like Afghanistan. Look at the red army in ww2, horrible k/d meat grinder, yet they won the war.Also, boasting about a favorable k/d when you are the best equipped, most developed, most expensive army in the world against rice niggers with flip flops and AKs is just pathetic
>>64651924>>64652186US still lost the war, retards. You had an enemy and you didn't defeat it. You have your ally, who you threw to the wolfs and it got destroyed.
Vietnam was so awesome it made furries cool.
>>64650318That would be>1989 Invasion of Panama>1990-1991 Persian Gulf War>Operation Restore HopeFight me>>64650777>Never allowed the army do actually win the war.This both is and isn't true. Crying about hippies and how the politicians didn't let the military commit enough war crimes to win is and has always been a retarded cope, but there's a small grain of truth to it. The most important measure that the US failed to take, that effectively doomed the whole adventure in Southeast Asia to failure before it even began, was the transition to a war economy and mobilization of the Reserves. And this was the one dirty trick that JFK, LBJ, and Nixon were completely unwilling to resort to.>Secretly bomb the shit out of Laos and Cambodia? Sure, why not?>Indiscriminate mass murder, rape, and torture of Vietnamese civilians? Sounds like a plan.>Spray Southeast Asia with enough defoliants to still be producing mutant kids 50 years later? Fine by me.>Give the CIA their own private air force to smuggle heroin with? Brilliant.>Kill what's left of the Gold Standard? What could go wrong?>Reactivate the War Production Board, deploy the National Guard to bolster troop strength, and ask Congress to declare a state of war? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!>>64651924>Check out our k/d ratios.This has always been a dumb cope, arguably a worse one than "we lost because of hippies/Democrats/not being allowed to commit enough war crimes". Success in war isn't measured in k/d but in the meeting of concrete goals based on measured assessments of what can and cannot be realistically accomplished using military force. This was the crux of why America failed in Vietnam and the War on Terror and why wars with constantly shifting/expanding goals (ex. Nazi Germany in WWII) in general almost always end in failure. The goals were either not set at all or essentially based in fantasy and could not possibly be met with existing limitations.
>>64650318Nah
>>64650335I hear Wagner while viewing this
>>64650777> LostAmerican combat troops leave 1973War ends 1975How can you lose a war that you are not involved in?
>>64652186The VC got destroyed by the Phoenix program and failed at the Tet offensive You are obviously retarded
>>64652195>Backed up by the Chinese and SovietsYou forgot the details kid
>>64654065>American combat troops leave 1973>War ends 1975>How can you lose a war that you are not involved in?
>>64654083Those are NOT combat troops kid
>>64654093>Those are NOT combat troops kidWhat the fuck do you think Marines are for? Spit-shining shoes?
>>64654107They're embassy security kid
>>64650720>sending young european mennahBurgers are not European, they are foreigners, half of them are basically zigger clones these days that want to kill the other half
>>64651686underrated posthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdTeHvVoQhQ
>>64654107>What the fuck do you think Marines are for?I dunno, I thought it was killing commies, since Putin is Trums dear fren but now I assume the marines are for doing push ups nude while Pete Hegseth walks around screaming he's not a fag on a selfie stick and that Europoors suck
