[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Bouncy.png (973 KB, 983x564)
973 KB
973 KB PNG
All the time, I hear "it's really difficult to invade islands using weapons." But Japan invaded like every island in the Pacific except Hawaii and Australia, and obviously succeeded just fine, and the US later did the same to Italy. Why was this the case?
>>
No resistance at the beach
>>
>>64656095
>Why was this the case?
A massive overwhelming difference in power.
>>
>>64656095
Due to the treaty the Japanese didn't have to worry too much about defenses with few exceptions. As for Italy see>>64656117
>>
>>64656095
>really difficult to invade islands using weapons
Even more difficult to invade without weapons
>>
>>64656095
It turns out it's much easier to invade islands before they've had literally years of fortifications built on them.
>>
>>64656095
Depends who is on the island

>A bunch of tribals with spears while you have a modern military
>trivial

>People with the ability to actually sink a ship
>Significantly harder
>>
Japan struck fast against undefended or otherwise poorly defended colonial outposts using light infantry.

But this wasn't easy and they still ended up with mass starvation due to bad logistics. People just underestimate Japan in WW2 when they clearly had a huge 'tism buff that allowed them to execute complex plans so long as there's no variables at work.

>US later did the same to Italy

The Italians were done with Mussolini with the fall of North Africa and the south in particular was never all that loyal to what was a regime centred around Milan.
>>
>>64656095
the role of the navy is virtually left out of all these discussions

Japan dedicated their main battle fleet to invading lightly-garrisoned and virtually unfortified colonial backwaters with minimal naval and air force presence.

besides, the Allies didn't do that "fighting to the last man" shit. you might argue that this resulted in fewer Japanese casualties, but it also means that 150,000 Allied personnel could be repatriated after WW2 who would otherwise be KIA. And don't forget that this number could have been at least 110,000 more if the Japs weren't brutal murdering bastards



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.