what's the tactical advantage of heavily armored IFVs when drones can simply spawncamp at the exit door?
so right zister, we should just use open topped golf carts and motorcycles cause they're going to die anyway. a brilliant tactical transition by russia that is unrelated to the empty bmp storage sites
>>64656350You couldn’t pay me enough to fight in this war
>>64656362you joke but motorcycles are unironically more survivable against FPVs>6 guys in an APCone drone kills them all>six guys on bikesa single drone can only kill one. there's also a (small but above zero) chance that they notice the drone and shoot it down
>>64656372motorcycles turn near misses into a guarantee that youre getting peppered by fragmentation. you're also much more likely to die from small arms fire and you have no organic fire support to suppress them. yes, it is the sensible choice if you want to send meat waves who you don't care about to take one trench at a time. the tactical equivalent of throwing shit at the wall until something sticks.
I'm sure there are numerous best practices to prevent exactly this sorta thing
>>64656387the extra bulk of APCs turns near misses into direct hits. but against artillery you are right though
>>64656350Modern warfare is so fucking gay.
Imagine being the driver, hitting the door open button, and two seconds later you just hear an explosion and a bunch of splattering meat from the back.
>Dispersed>Immune to fragmentation and small arms fire>Even if he gets Dismembered will survive anyway>Can shoot down drones, doesnt need to suppress the enemy when his weapon will just explode them first hit
>>64656350Are these ukies getting splatter? Mods, please remove
Well the first guy probably absorbed most of the blast.
>>64656429Ukraine is like the imperium of man from 40k if you think about it. Their leader even has a golden throne!
