What do we think about the Sig P211? or you guys are too poor for it?
I am too poor for it.
>>64656824How, one with about 400 rounds through it cost $1800.
>>64656820>Sig P211does it shoot itself like the other one?
>>64657032Ironically is what Sig did to save themselves from the P320 fiasco.
>>64656820SiG makes excellent equipment. Adding all that crap to one is try-hard heresy.
>>64656820A glib facsimile.
>>64656820wow, a 2011, so cool…The action feels nice (To my tasteless ass) the compensator works pretty well as far as I know and the decision to use P320 mags was pretty smart. I like the style too, if it weren’t for those massive front serrations it would look like something out of aaron beck’s art. IIRC the hammer and magazine funnel are MIMed and the guide rod bushing is plastic and has a tendency to break. And it doesn’t have a compless variant for the USPSA nerds it’s somewhat marketed towards. All in all I think it’s an ok gun, i’m sure their margins on the thing are way higher then they aught. But sigs gonna sig, why try to get that last 20% out of a product if you can convince some sucker to overpay for a riced up 2011.
>>64656866I'm an ecologist and make $19/hr
