>>64661728Let the piece of shit go.
>>64661777What was wrong with it?
>>64661728Not a serious aircraft
>>64661728Don't worry, now Boeing is in charge of the US 6th gen, the F-47
>>64661788It didn't meet the requirements on time.
>>64661791NOT A SOLDIERS AIRCRAFT
>>64661791But an aircraft nonetheless
>>64661788Aviation has a single golden ruleLooks good, flies good.Safe to say this accomplishes neither.
>>64662913I actually like the way it looks. Unironically.
>>64661728A flying joke.
>>64662927It's got this vibe.
>>64661728=]
>>64662927t.
>>64662959>that wide open tailSlut.
>worse than X-35>didnt meet the requirements, had to ask for lower altitude testing>boeing said it was a 'demonstrator', not the actual design
>>64662927>posts concept art instead of pictures of the actual thingreally makes you think
>>64663048Probably because the actual thing doesn't exist so we just have concept art and a tech demonstrator to look at.
>>64663017The Boomer Cannucks are nothing if not consistent, argumentum ad arrowum. I swear they think that every aircraft in the USAF was supposed to be an interceptor. >>64662489TIGHT TOLERANCES, FOWARD DIRECTED JET EXHAUST, IT'S UNFUCKING RELIABLE, AAAAAAAA!
>>64663077My point is that the concept art is highly flattering compared to what was actually built. I know it would have been refined a lot before production, but still.
>>64662961If you got it, flaunt it.
>>64661728>>64662927I do really like her. It is a very unique looking aircraft, and I love those.
>>64661728slampig dimensions
