Assuming US refuse to support Japan / even possibly supplying Intel to China / RussiaAssuming Russia is involved, from intel to possibly actual firepower contribution.Can China decapitate a nuclear development lab, say, size of LANL +- research reactor effectively purely through conventional means within the next five years? I am thinking massive strike via conventional ballistic missiles and standoff strike from bombers?https://www.reddit.com/r/LessCredibleDefence/comments/1psry5t/can_china_achieve_us_vs_iran_like_performance_if/
>>64666137>Assuming US refuse to support Japan / even possibly supplying Intel to China / Russiawhy are contrarians like this?
>>64666137Japan already has the capability to produce a nuclear warhead, the knowhow, materials, and a delivery system. If Japan wants a nuke, China can't stop them.
>>64666137fuck off reddit
>>64666137no lolit would also be national suicide for china.
>>64666137Russia the great "near peer" that never was has proved that the rest of the planet is weaker than America was in the 70s.China is using mortars that would have been laughed at in WW1.
>>64666137gb2reddit>>64666217What the fuck? Do they not believe in baseplates at an institutional level or something?
>>64666217>China is using mortars that would have been laughed at in WW1.Decadent wectoid can't grasp quantum technology incorporated of dialectic and great leader Mao thought. All of grid square is in quantum superposition of "target" and "not target" until shell lands. Amerikkka has no counter.
>>64666232They're the nation most likely to put bayonets on mortars.
>>64666217Holy fucking shit this is like an onion as I rewatch it and realize they don't have any sights or anything to reference where the fuck they're aiming. All my what.Who the fuck in their propaganda department looks and this and thinks>this is perfectly fine>the internet won't ever fucking stare for more than 5 seconds on tiktoks>especially our own domestic shit where some of our spicy internet users are willing to lose social credit>to call out the most blatant shit like this ever as some official wears 10 rolexes on his arm in the background
>>64666247>>64666217Think we can skip the mortar part and just slap bayonets on bundled mortar rounds if they're willing to beat the Norks for fanaticism in the propaganda department.>Why yes comrade the latest W998 round has a bayonet lug on the fuse
>>64666137>Assuming US refuse to support Japan / even possibly supplying Intel to China / Russia
>>64666254That video isn't for us, it's for the normie civvies both domestic and foreign who don't know shit about mortars and actually believes that video. It's the same reason why ISIS was doing flips through burning hoops. It's fucking useless for combat, but clueless civvies thinks it looks "strong", "brave" and is a genuine showcase of power.
>>64666423Their own netizens can get spicy when the retardation is blatant, their agitprop dorks truly are second class to peddle this kind of crap.
>>64666137holy fuck they're advancing
>>64666296Sex with albedo
unless the jap can build a nuke in 45 minutes. As the winners of WWII, China can rightfully (or even is required) nuke the Jap per UN charters.
>>64666296>he doesn't knowIt's the G2 world now, babe. G7 is over.
>>64666181that's what disarmament boomers would like you to believe but it's not 1950s anymore and it's not enough to build a crude 1 ton 50kt uranium warhead then put it on a basic ballistic missile to have a credible deterrent, you need to develop and field several incredibly complex systems based on scarce information and the penalty for getting something wrong is worsening your strategic situation not improving it compared to nonproliferation
>>64666232>Do they not believe in baseplates at an institutional level or something?It's supposed to be marketed as them having "ingenuity" by shaving the mortar down to it's barest components, making it lightweight and seeming implessive because the implication is they can field these "lightweight mortars" en masse
>>64666137Disappointing.
>>64666577The PRC didn't exist in WW2, retard.
>>64666687>it's not enough to build a crude 1 ton 50kt uranium warhead then put it on a basic ballistic missile to have a credible deterrentExcept this is the exact level of deterrent that Norks have maintained to this day without much issue. Japan already has the tech for an ICBM though JAXA and are actively deploying an SRBM/MRBM with a maneuvering warhead on a mobile TEL. Japan has the pieces for an effective deterrent.
>>64666941baste
>>64666232The bongs use 51mm hand mortars quite successfully. I suspect this is a drill for emergency use of mortars against enemies within a couple hundred meters. Basically where the mortar man can see it himself and walk it onto target
