[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: chariots.jpg (94 KB, 570x382)
94 KB
94 KB JPG
What advantage do Chariots offer over mounted horsemen?
>>
>>64667622
They let you use small horses as draft animals that wouldn't be able to support a man's weight. Also some theorize that it could be a battle taxi, kind of like a proto dragoon force.
>>
The horses don't need to be big enough to carry a man and his gear.
>>
>>64667622
You can put cool scythes on them.
>>
They're the best thing going when you haven't figured out the stirrup yet.
>>
>>64667622
Stirrups weren't a thing when war chariots was used. Mounted soldiers didn't charge shit, except for a very few elite formations like Alexander's cav.
>>
>>64667622
Never heard of mounted horsemen repelling jewish god
>>
Pulling must have been easier for the horse than riding.
>>
>>64667622
Chariots generally co-opt boards on 4chan to support a fake narrative about a war happening overseas so politicans can launder money
>>
>>64667622
Somewhat faster and you've got better footing for fighting.
>>
>>64667779
Not really. Everyone ditched chariots long before the stirrup shows up archeologically. Some theorize it existed and we just haven't found them (perhaps made of leather which rotted away), but it's not in literary or art sources either. Whereas as soon as they show up, they're in art and literature as it's hard not to talk about them when discussing mounted combat.

The "small horse" angle might be correct, although I doubt it. New evidence from skeletons shows Indo-Europeans were riding horses enough to have skeletal deformities associated with frequent horseback riding, long before the introduction of war chariots. (though, carts/wagons were in use).

My personal take is that chariot combat was not particularly different from horseback combat in the ancient world. Roman sources describe Germanic cavalry as being directly accompanied by and assisted by infantry; for every horseman, there would be an infantryman working as a team, tagging alongside them, and if necessary they'd hop on with the rider and escape. Even after the invention and popularization of stirrups in Europe, knights from many nations would often choose to fight on foot, using the horse more for transport than combat.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.