Would Littoral Combat Shits ironically be good for what the Navy's doing right now like capturing Venezuela tankers and bombing phishing botes? Maybe we should bring them back.
>>64667990If you armed them with drones, I think they actually would be able to do blockade-holding duties. But is it worth pulling them from wherever they're currently deployed?
>>64667990>capturing Venezuela tankersthey let a russian shadow fleet tanker though
>>64668020Where are they deployed?
>>64667990Unironically yes. It may conceivably even already have done it (likely not however).>LCS are fitted with Hellfire missiles in vertical launchersHellfire missiles were used at least some of the times to destroy the ships.>LCSs are deployed with Seahawk helicoptersSome variant of Seahawks were used for the insertion in the video from last week.All that aside, it was more likely hellfires from a drone and a Coast Guard variant Jayhawk that we have seen. But it is feasible that LCSs have or at least could be performing these missions as we know at least two are in the general area.
>>64667990It was littorally built for that but you fucked it up, and now it’s over.
>>64668020>If you armed them with dronesFunny you should mention that >>64658887>I think they actually would be able to do blockade-holding dutiesYes, easily. Their speed and low observability would be assests here.>But is it worth pulling them from wherever they're currently deployed?We know some of the Freedom class have been with the force there for the past month. Even more are stationed in northeast Florida, so not that far.>>64668056Russia has nukes. Haven't you ever wondered why the US hasn't done anything to them up to this point?>>64668067Literally all over the world.>>64668646Well played
>>64668658>literally all over the worldWhat a shame, should just chuck them all in the SCS and make the pinoys crew them.
>>64668821That's where the good ones are.
