[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: RDT_20251224_081219.webm (1 MB, 720x720)
1 MB
1 MB WEBM
>what's the best way to deal with FPV drones?
>guns? no
>missiles? no
>lasers? no
>other drones? no
>nets? bingo

is it really that easy? if so, what took so fucking long?
>>
>using a net gun with a maximum range shorter than the wounding radius of a guided munition as point defense against that munition.
Yeah nah chief, this ain't it
>>
>>64674254
true, but it's better than catching the drone with your face
>>
None of these have live munitions on them, if you shoot them down, they're FINNA explode.
>>
>>64674249
All ERA should be replaced with a net throwing charge. I'm not sure how to rig 4ft detection though.
However ANY distance from the best point it can explode is better. These should have been ubiquitous boring shit by now.
>>
>the year is 2075
>the whole planet is glistening from a covering of glasfibrer strands and nylon nets
>ironically this covering reflected enough sunlight to halt global warming
>>
>>64674249
next step drones are going to be firing rockets to stay out of range of nets
>>
>>64674249
>pretends that nets are used in isolation for some fucking reason
Shit thread
>>
>>64674249
I now understand why John Titor was in a shotgun unit.
>>
just use a shotgun lol. it's a plastic $5 chink drone.
>>
>>64674249
spread out, make it expensive, dont make a really juicy target
>>
I prefer the meta of not being there in the first place and letting dumb mobiks get slaughtered instead
>>
>>64674310
asian dude w saiga is the best you can do?
>>
>>64674310
>russia is white
>>
>>64674254
As a last line of defense fr infantry it's probably the most effective you're going to get. Outside of training every single grunt to be at competition level with a shotgun.
>>
>>64674268
patently false, my brown friend
>>
Just increase the speed of the FPV drones and make the GWOT fags seethe harder with their outdated tactics.
>>
File: LOKE Sweden anti-drone.mp4 (2.81 MB, 1080x1920)
2.81 MB
2.81 MB MP4
>>64674249
>>
>>64674351
Masterkeys don't seem like that bad of an idea anymore.
>>
>>64674249
Nets have been a drone countermeasure for a while. The problem initially in this war was that the drones mostly dropped ordnance and stayed out of shotgun range, so nets weren't an option. Fpv suicide drones get much closer so shotguns and nets are viable countermeasures; the response to this will be standoff suicide drones. Imagine a drone equipped with a claymore instead of an rpg and its initiated on command instead of contact. This puts the drone out of net range, but probably not out of shotgun range.
>>
>>64674268
Given how these tend to be fused, yes this will be an issue, even shooting a net at it could set it off. Still better than the alternative.
>>
>>64674353
The ideal soldier has an extremely well-determined momentum to ensure his position has an extremely broad distribution density.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.