>A Chinese made Cambodian multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) malfunctioned while firing at a Thai position
>>64678440Has any territory been shifted around? Or is this just a shooting war
China Quality.This is why it says "Light Fuse and Get Away" on chink fireworks like this.
>>64678440Is this real or AI? Why is there an entire row of soldiers standing behind a firing rocket launcher?
>>64678478Either AI these people are monumentally retarded even for turdies.
>>64678532>or theseahem
>>64678478Just thirdy things.Doesn't look like AI to me, I see o obvious red flags.
>>64678440Apparently this was AI generated.
>>64678478mindbroken
>>64678440>multipleSuspiciously small cookoff for a fucking grad exploding.Unless that was something like the last tube failing with the rocket still getting out
>>64678478Turdie behavior
>>64678440Apparently this is the fifth one that did exploded or something:>On 24 December 2025, a Chinese-made Type-90B 122 mm exploded and rolled over after multiple automatic fires by the Cambodian Army. This is the fifth multiple-launch rocket system to explode after 18 December 2025.>The root cause of the explosion was overheating of low-quality metal used to manufacture Type 90B 122mm rockets.
>>64678440Looks like the nozzle on one of the rockets ruptured.
>>64678785>The root cause of the explosion was [Chinesium]kek
>>64678785>>64678828If China makes good on their Taiwan invasion then we're going to definitely be needing a separate category tallying incidents and numbers of PLA troops killed by their own equipment.
>>64678785>This is the fifth multiple-launch rocket system to explode after 18 December 2025.Holy fuck. And two Thai VT-4 tank barrels have exploded too. Inedibly implessive chinesium.
>>64678888>Second VT-4That's new
>>64678440this is ai. chinese products have 100% reliability.
>>646784783rd world for a reason
>>64678591that's not a cookoff, that's the inital explosion of a rocket engine in its tube, the cookoff happen later but the video in OP is cut
>>64678440>>64678469>>64678785>>64678888Implessive!
chalk up another one for chink genius
>>64678785>>The root cause of the explosion was overheating of low-quality metalHoly fuck. Chinese quality is going to make Taiwan be a comedy, isn't it
>>64679079Is this like a training exercise? Or do they actually have a hole in their ship?
>>64679155>cctv>that lighting and camera workwhat do you think?
>>64678888Cecked and sieg heil'd.I guess this is why the Chinese have been so shy about exporting weapons in the past.
>>64679155It's a door that won't latch properly. The guy that got bonked in the face is probably dead.
>>64679079Why would their propaganda channel show this footage? Is that sunlight shining through a gap in the hatches' sides?
>>64679079Ayayaya angry to die!!
>>64679079
>>64679320Context? I want to google more info about that. Looks amusing.
>>64679328Prototype of the ZBD/ZTD-05 sinking in 2002.
>>64678440Skavenesque.
>>64679320Taiwan beachhead trailer
>>64679346please please our weapons are much very safe better yes yes
>>64678785>This is the fifth multiple-launch rocket system to explode after 18 December 2025.Now I understand why Russian army always ranker higher than Chinese. Soviet Grads made in 1980s probably are more reliable today than Chinkshit made 3 years ago
>>64679079There was plenty of times when I was in the US Navy as a HT doing this, nothing worked.
Did equipment explode like this in ww2? Or ww1? How often does equipment shit the bed throughout history?
>>64679320Look at the smoke. Is it coal-fired?
>>64678440NO REFUNDS
>>64678440>tourists falling for actual AI sloppa what a board.
>>64679447>Did equipment explode like this in ww2?Yes.>Or ww1?Yes.>How often does equipment shit the bed throughout history?Pretty often.
>>64679518you got to post proof if you're going to make that claim
is there a single fucking country left that can build weapons that dont fall apart? fucking hell
>>64678440Reminds me a while back. Some chink shill was posting images of one their man-portable AT systems. One of the images appeared to be one that was recently used because the tube was showing signs of being heated quite a bit to the point it was glowing red. Worst part was the glow wasn't evenly distributed. Can only assume the sinikar metallurgy was applied to those tunes.
>>64679529Chink cope
>>64679518Was the train station in Serbian that chinks built, AI?
>>64679518and a ching chong ping pong to you too Mr Wumao.
>>64679604he just equipped the preorder skin
>>64678460They're fighting over temples which means small victories but ones with massive cultural significance. As usual there's a French hand behind it all.
>>64679833Oh, that's confidence inspiring."China Quality" indeed.
>>64679320>Grand Tour: Taiwan Invasion
>>64679518your 50 cents, bootlicker
>>64679833>urge to poop self intensifies
>>64679833What could have caused this?
>>64678440>slightly less multiple launch rocket system, SLMRS
>>64679911Just a guess?Shitty Manufacturing.
>>64679925>Ho Lee Fook's Rocket Emporium of Fortune
>>64679937>>64679911to be extremely charitable, that is supposed to be a disposable AT launcher.
>>64679911Chinese QC.
>>64679911You can have a weapon that has a 1 in a fuckinsane chance of exploding when fired.ORYou can have a weapon that has a 1 in 10k chance of exploding when fired. It'll be lighter and you'll hit pooh's KPIs all while you embezzle money by overstating claims with your waterlogged product (protip: that's what the ICBM scandal was about for understanding the context of that word).
improper installation, storage, past expiry date rockets, possible damage, etc
>>64679962>to be extremely charitable, that is supposed to be a disposable AT launcher.Maybe, but in the case of something like a M72 LAW, the disposable part is the tube, not the mook holding it.
>>64679991>the disposable part is the tube, not the mook holding itDecadent gweilo capitalist standards
>>64678440Looks like a cracked SRB grain, turns a rocket motor into a pipe bomb. Pretty common with rough handling or long term storage.t. rocketry nerd
>>64680014>Explodes nowhere near launcher>Those insanely fucked up physics with the launcher bed>No secondaries>The niggas in the backLiterally nothing about this looks real, and the internet has been full of AI fakes of this dogshit since day 1 of hostilities.
>>64680032The explosion mostly comes out the back of the tube same as all the successful launches, that's why I think it's a booster failure.As for being AI maybe but I don't see anything that stands out, can you?
>>64678478Hard to say.Seems too stupid to be true but there are no obvious tells that would prove it's AI.
>>64679447Equipment like this did not even exist in WWI.Not even in WWII since katyusha had launch rails not tubes.
>>64680120There was tube launched rocket artillery.
>>64679911Anything from poor design, materials, quality control, etc, to just skimping out on paint
>>64680134Well, fuck me. Did that thing actually see much action anywhere?
>>64680134Not really, just towards the end.My first and only anime girl figure was based on it. Germans had tube launched rocket artillery as well, the nebelwerfer. The panzerwerfer here was used as armored self propelled artillery, of course. The T-34 calliope was just a sherman with rocket artillery welded on, and I think they were intended to mostly fight as tanks, not artillery. They showed up in theater in 44, had the rockets removed before combat, and only had them reattached at the very end of the war.
>>64678785You know, I troll the wumaos pretty aggressively, but this is even worse than I expected. No fucking wonder the chinks have been so afraid of using any of their shit outside of controlled testing environments
>>64678785>it's realOh no no no no, chinkbros on suicide watch
>>64680221It is interesting thirdies seem to enjoy standing next to the rocket launcher, like its not as if huffing uncle mao's hell fart backblast is healthy or you're fulfilling anything more than a liveleak-esque worksafe 'reasons not to do what Dong Bong is doing'
>>64678440It mostly worked.
About what I expected
>>64678440Not even a wumao but it's probably ai generated, it's on a 8x8 chassis while the 90B has a 6x6 one.
>>64680275That's because you should know that its not a 90B and a PHL-81
>>64680275I think it's actually some Grad variant
>>64680298The only 8x8 chassis they use is a Czech mlrs.
>>64679298It almost certainly is a training exercise. If an actual ship was sinking you probably wouldn't have a film crew standing there.
>>64680321Its a PHL-81, they're a Temu BM-21 on a 6x6, usually one of two Chinese cab-over trucks
>>64680329And the truck in OP's vid is a 8x8. M8 it's AI, don't poison the well when there's real footage of chinese gear self destructing.
>>64678440>achually it's an czech mlrs truck!The ccp bots are already coping.
