presented without commentary
>>646838483F Flecktarn has no business being tested here, since it's a dedicated desert/arid terrain camo. They should have at least tested multitarn, as that's meant to be an all-terrain camo
>>64683848It all goes back to 1548 you see when we find the REAL reason the west has prevented us from...I'm sorry this was about what?
Camo literally does not matter, you could have your army dress in grey and it would be fine
>>64683848>multicam tropic>works best in woodlandsThink someone got the wrong design brief.
>>64683960Legit wanna see a return to OD green. Also gonna start calling my down syndrome cousin who's wheelchair bound and barely coherent vegetato from now on.
>>64683848I love how tactical camo companies aren't even fucking trying anymore.
>>64683848I can't describe how angry I am that flecktarn will be replaced.
>>64683848>>64683910I can understand why you are incapable of seeing the multicam section. There is a section labeled multicam but all they put there was a forest.
>>64683848I actually really like multicam tropic, it's just a nicer look for the pattern
>>64683996>Legit wanna see a return to OD green.me too
>>64684414Multitarn isn't multicam.
>>64683848>multicam wins AGAINAs a multicam enjoyer, I enjoy this
>>64683848I tried making some shit out of Concamo about a year ago after being impressed with it in tests like this, turns out the cordura and ripstop shit has been sold out worldwide for years, basically since Ukraine kicked off. Could have bought a ghosthood and cut that up; but thats shits way too lightweight to make clothing or gear out of.
Does camo really matter in the drone age?
>>64684747Obviously. If your enemy has improved observation equipment, then your concealment needs to be better. Hence leaf suits being so popular on both sides even with regular units, full body scrim was never necessary in previous wars, but the demands are higher now.
>>64684389>Flecktarn will be replaced>By Flecktarn in multicam colorsYou germanophile nerds need to stop with the gooning to blonde women, it's messing with your brains.
>>64684747Any actual meaningful fights still involve infantry going where there's enemy infantry and killing them. Camo helps significantly there.
>>64684747that's what people said about thermals and night vision decades ago
>>64684818no they didnt. camo mattered to the extent that they tried to make night vision specific camos like desert night and alpenflage. similarly, thermal camo was played with at least as far back as the 90s, and just wasnt a high priority as until recently only western countries could field thermals on scale.
>>64683848>*tapes a ring of neon color tape around every limb to not get friendly fire'd*finally, perfect camo
>>64684835Doesn't happen outside of wars where bothsides have a lack of standardized gear like in Ukraine.
>>64684831everyone talked about how it was a game changer in iraq 1.0
>>64683960Unironically. If Ukraine has shown us anything its that camouflage and uniforms in general have become to influenced by 'the meta' and can't be differentiated in combat environments, which it turns out is actually pretty important.
