[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: chain wip tank defense.jpg (550 KB, 5704x1478)
550 KB
550 KB JPG
Here is how tanks can win.

The chain doesn't need to be very thick, just strong enough to support a very high RPM, and also collision against drones.

Even if the chain breaks, the spool can just release more chain.

There should be some dynamic counter weight to keep things balanced.
>>
but how can we make it AI-powered
>>
The heli-tank was proposed in 2023. By me.
Russians patented it some time afterward.
>>
>>64684913
the problem is that such a long chain will start hitting stuff around the tank, forcing you out into the open, where the lack of cover will make you more vulnerable. Sure it will take more drones to kill you but once your location is known it's only a matter of time until one goes through. That, or you get hit by artillery that doesn't care about your chain. Hiding in a treeline without this system would have been better.
>>
>>64684954
There is a spool, just make it shorter if needed.
>>
>>64684954
Except 99% of the footage we have of drones destroying tanks, the tanks were out in the open.
>>
File: 1764540489955399.webm (3.63 MB, 480x854)
3.63 MB
3.63 MB WEBM
>>64684913
Or just mount a radar guided Bushmaster.
You still get a chain.
>>
>>64684995
It should be cheap as fuck to implement something that just rotates a chain spool.

When compared to something that requires radar and a gun.
>>
>drone operator see this
>"well, that's new"
>lowers the drone to ground level
>hits the track
>tank can't move anymore
>>
>>64685034
You're retarded.
>>
File: 1672608101169385.png (226 KB, 419x530)
226 KB
226 KB PNG
>>64684913
You're going to kill more friendly infantry than enemy drones, but honest to god I'm here for it.
>>
>>64684913
The chain should also be electrified to detonate payloads early when it intercepts a projectile.
>>
>>64685389
The chain should also be set on fire for style points.
>>
>>64684913
Drone just comes in from the top defeating your chain lasso of doom
>>
>>64684913
One drone comes in, detonates and destroys the chain
Second drone comes in, no chain to stop it
>>
why does it have to be a chain? just use a huge spool of weed whacker cable
>>
File: NIGGER WHIPPER 5000.jpg (45 KB, 640x360)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
>>64684913
WE ARE SO FUCKING BACK, BOYS. In fact, WE ARE NOW OVER 9000!
>>
>>64686045
It has a spool, the chain can regenerate.
>>
>>64684925
Through the power of Blockchain!
>>
>>64684913
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cb6NS_F5xTE
Why whip around a chain when you can spin a large plate with no gap at all?
>>
there are so many things wrong here I barely even know where to start
>tank flailing its nigger discipliner now fails at being mobile cover for infantry, i.e. its primary role in a combined arms group
>zero top defense against something that can fly, and very precisely at that (see >>64685431 )
>rests on some dogshit pole that has to not only support the retarded contraption but resist it spinning at, per your own words, "very high RPM", plus however fast the "oscillating arm" moves, so at least two different stressors going in two different directions
>device itself is an easy target, no need to target the chain on the first strike like >>64686045 says, just come from above and hit literally any other part, be it the pole, the motor, the arm, the spool... now the tank lost its defense mechanism and we're back to square one for the low low cost of... one extra drone
>severely limited range compared to a bushmaster, a very bad thing for discouraging repeated attempts ("who cares if the first drone missed the tism chain spinner? just send another one, it's not like they can actually do anything about it" vs "shit they spotted us, any other drone that tries again is just gonna get shot down, abort")
and no doubt countless more things I'm forgetting. it doesn't matter how cheap the defense is, it's trying to defend something worth several times more than itself. however much your nigger-rigged system costs, if it fails to defend the several million dollar tank, it still ends up more expensive than properly investing in a good system and its maintenance, even if that system costs several hundred thousand dollars.
>>
Most tanks are used in urban combat so they're practically useless. However they could make a low power AI-guided railgun (1 kilowatt or less) that fires a salvo of magnets at a very rapid rate to shoot down drones trying to approach
>>
This is a really good idea, the top 90 degrees attack could be prevented by adding a spear on the top of the rotating thing.
>>
File: 1766860535913991.jpg (1.24 MB, 5294x3032)
1.24 MB
1.24 MB JPG
I finalized OP's design.
If you add a flamethrower at the top. there will be no blind spots for any drone attack.
>>
>>64688366
impressive, very nice
>>
>>64684913
Ah the "spin katana really fast to reflect bullets" technique, a classic.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.