>>64687217i like the idea of firing an explosive device the size of an airborne bomb from a tank.for when you have no air superiority but need smth to be bombed.
>>64687312>>64687312its a bomb they chose not to avoid
I'm gonna bergepanther my Sturmtiger
>>64687217one of my ex gfs told me onceits not the lengthits the diameter
>>64687217Sturmtiger
>>64687312Its probably quite fun until you're one of the poor fucks that has to try and ram something the size of a waterheater in the breach in the confines of a tank
Is its armament more effective than other towed artillery, or close air support, against fortified targets?
>>64687319Probably out of laziness
>>64687217>ww2>shitty footage>cameraman always misses the money shot>shitty jumpcutswar... war never changes
>>64687369relax, its a german car, made for max. comfiness.the heavy lifting inside and outside the tank is done with a crane.
>>64690308any AFV with its own onboard crane for loading main armament is to be feared
>>64689764>effectiveDefine your effects.
>>64692443Deleting Poles
>>64692443(You) read the post replied to.how is the 38 cm shell more effective than other large towed artillery, or 500 kg aerial bomb
>>64687217>building a heavy breakthrough assault tank for busting bunkers during the part of the war where you're on the backfoot and you're the ones getting your bunkers bustedGerman autism at its finest
