[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1744099393662691.png (1.75 MB, 1755x2170)
1.75 MB
1.75 MB PNG
The MOD of Taiwan released a chart detailing each threat from PLA's long range strikes and how to deal with them. How accurate and effective is this chart? Could Ukraine take one notes that could help them against Russian Strikes?
>>
I wouldn't categorize row 1, countermeasure point 2 as "evacuation".
It's more like "dispersal", i.e. don't concentrate all your C3 in a single location.
In any case it's nice to see that the nationalist tradition of warplanning without regard to reality nor enemy capabilities continues unabated 75 years after losing the mainland.
>>
>>64694103
How's the Apache helicopter supposed to deal with ballistic missile and GMLRS strikes?
>>
>>64694129
They're not familiar with the concept of PLAAF existing yet.
The entire document was clearly written as if it's still the 60s and the ROC rules the waves and the skies. Literally zero mention of enemy multirole fighters/non-helicopter based CAS in an anti-air document.
Makes me wonder if this thing was written by one of the PLAN deniers we have on /k/.
>>
>butthurt chinkshill is seething again
lol
>>
I wonder how they're supposed to shoot down ballistic missiles with "machine guns"
>>
>>64694177
PLAAF fast movers are in row 3
>>
>>64694103
Why do ballistic missiles appear in 3 different rows?
>>
It's literally from 2022 chink
>>
>>64694397
'cause China got tons of those and they can be used against different targets for different aims.

In row 1, the aim is to strike fast against the C4 to create as much confusion and delay as possible in Taiwan's coordinated reaction. Basically a case of "We are being attack ! What are the fucking orders ?"

In row 3, it's to target the infrastructure in a fast and brutal way, so that anything docked or on the tarmac is damaged and cannot be deployed, reducing the size of Taiwan's first line of defense.

In row 4, its to provide rapid reaction fire on Taiwan's airfields, artillery and AA batteries that are firing on paratroopers but that the rocket artillery cannot reach or that are too saturated in air defenses to be directly targeted. You just burry them under heavy payload then. It is a bit weird to do that when paratroopers are already there but I guess it's meant to provide direct support against whatever is putting an actual resistance.

Once beach heads have been established, starting row 5, the troops can guide strikes as needed until air defense is silent and PLAAF can just operate in total impunity.

This isn't unrealistic but one could argue the chinks will use the PLAAF aircraft earlier to drop cruise missiles as needed, unless their accuracy is crap without close range laser guidance from the ground.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.